| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wooden nickels
Joined: 23 May 2010
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:03 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Troglodyte wrote: |
| hogwonguy1979 wrote: |
here is a good article that pretty much refutes the drivel apologists like ontheway have been saying for years that being an independent contractor is legal
http://www.koreaobserver.com/english-teachers-duped-by-employers-in-korea-27140
apparently according to kimmig it is illegal to employ an e2 visa holder as an independent contractor is illegal it just sounds like they dont have the manpower to enforce it |
The Seoul High Court ruled on the CDI case back in November. The decision was that the teachers were clearly employees and not independent contractors. CDI was forced to make some huge compensation payments to each of the teachers (over 40 million Won to some of them). |
I've have been saying this for years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hogwonguy1979
Joined: 22 Dec 2003
Location: the racoon den
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wooden nickels wrote: |
| Troglodyte wrote: |
| hogwonguy1979 wrote: |
here is a good article that pretty much refutes the drivel apologists like ontheway have been saying for years that being an independent contractor is legal
http://www.koreaobserver.com/english-teachers-duped-by-employers-in-korea-27140
apparently according to kimmig it is illegal to employ an e2 visa holder as an independent contractor is illegal it just sounds like they dont have the manpower to enforce it |
The Seoul High Court ruled on the CDI case back in November. The decision was that the teachers were clearly employees and not independent contractors. CDI was forced to make some huge compensation payments to each of the teachers (over 40 million Won to some of them). |
I've have been saying this for years. |
so have I and that goes back to the Bill Kapoun case in 2008, its people like ontheway who keeps insisting (apologizing??) that IC status on an E2 visa was legal |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Troglodyte
Joined: 06 Dec 2009
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hogwonguy1979 wrote: |
| wooden nickels wrote: |
| Troglodyte wrote: |
| hogwonguy1979 wrote: |
here is a good article that pretty much refutes the drivel apologists like ontheway have been saying for years that being an independent contractor is legal
http://www.koreaobserver.com/english-teachers-duped-by-employers-in-korea-27140
apparently according to kimmig it is illegal to employ an e2 visa holder as an independent contractor is illegal it just sounds like they dont have the manpower to enforce it |
The Seoul High Court ruled on the CDI case back in November. The decision was that the teachers were clearly employees and not independent contractors. CDI was forced to make some huge compensation payments to each of the teachers (over 40 million Won to some of them). |
I've have been saying this for years. |
so have I and that goes back to the Bill Kapoun case in 2008, its people like ontheway who keeps insisting (apologizing??) that IC status on an E2 visa was legal |
I'm surprised that Ontheway hasn't yet posted to say that he wants to see official, translated court transcripts accompanied by an explanation from the judge before we can consider this relevant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wildbore
Joined: 17 Jun 2009
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
A labor advocate for foreign teachers advised that expats in Dirk’s position take a copy of their contract into the appropriate government department with a statement of the E-2 conditions and regulations.
“In the past that was enough to get them registered and on their way, with a bill sent to the employer with a small fine,” the labor advocate said. |
Where can one go about finding the "statement of E-2 conditions and regulations"
Nice article, but not helpful if the documents that can help get your registered for your entitlements aren't readily accessible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Good Will Riker
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Location: South Korea
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sethtes wrote: |
| Good Will Riker wrote: |
| sethtes wrote: |
| Good Will Riker wrote: |
3.) Also, what do we call an Independent Contractor in the Korean language? Please provide what it is called in "한국어," so that my employer and I are on the same page here, so that we can report it properly.
|
그러니까 thats the same information im tryna get |
Please be polite next time, even though there are plenty of openly rude individuals online and in South Korea. ~
Independent Contractor = 개인사업자 ~
For further inquiry in regards to this matter, PM ttompatz about it. ~
He has all of the answers as long as your questions are clearly and consisely addressed to him. ~
AND PLEASE BE POLITE NEXT TIME, TONTO. (With your level of impatience and overall rudeness, you may as well be from South Carolina?) ~
DO THAT PLENTY OF TIMES, AND YOU'LL GET FURTHER IN LIFE. ~ |
My impoliteness was directed at others who had already not answered my question (despite coming back to post additional comments in the debate) when I did ask politely, friend. Sometimes you have to talk loud to get information out of people who are arguing. Thank you for keeping track of an old post and coming back to it when you found the answer to your(our) question
also I take insults to either carolina srsly  |
I understand where you are coming from, man. ~
Let's all learn to get along here.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
