|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
So how does this Peruvian-turned-Jew sit with the whole "Israel is racist" epitheth????
Koreans and Germans treat those with Korean or German blood differently than those that are lacking in said "blood".
The previous slur against Israel was that Israel had the audacity to be like Germany and Korea (ie, accepting as citiznes only those that are of the same genetic/blood group). Now it has been proven that Judaism is bigger than blood and now that leads to a new slur. What's stopping a Palestinian from embracing Judaism and gaining Israeli citizenship??? nothing. Except of course if that Muslim is a resident of Saudi Arabia or Iran, for whom such a choice equals death.
Of course, the audacity of Israel admitting Jewish converts from the other side of the world is more egregious than the death penalty that applies to Muslims who choose another faith. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Butterfly
Joined: 02 Mar 2003 Location: Kuwait
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please approach the counter arguments to your original point. Please. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
What....are you my debate coach??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Butterfly,
why not answer my questions?
Does the fact that ANY human being, if they convert to Judaism, has the right to Israeli citizenship qualify Israel as a "racist, apartheid state" as leftist loonies tend to label it????
How many ancient countries (as opposed to newer, post-tribal societies like US/Canada et al) have such a mechanism to citizenship and inclusion? Look at Korea and Japan. It would be impossible for a bunch of Ecuadorian Indians to convert to Korean/Japanese and be welcomed as citizens. Not so for Israel.
So this makes Israel racist????? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Carry the analogy further....
Any Christian would be welcomed as a citizen of Italy.....Sweden....Armenia.....Australia......Mexico.......
or.... any Muslim could be a citizen of Saudi Arabia (not happening).....or Malaysia (200,000 muslims being deported as we speak)
millions of Christians have killed millions of fellow Christians....
and millions of Muslims have killed millions of fellow Muslims........
but the United Nations singles out Israel for a reprimand.
Fucking crazy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
sundubuman wrote: |
Butterfly,
why not answer my questions?
Does the fact that ANY human being, if they convert to Judaism, has the right to Israeli citizenship qualify Israel as a "racist, apartheid state" as leftist loonies tend to label it????
How many ancient countries (as opposed to newer, post-tribal societies like US/Canada et al) have such a mechanism to citizenship and inclusion? Look at Korea and Japan. It would be impossible for a bunch of Ecuadorian Indians to convert to Korean/Japanese and be welcomed as citizens. Not so for Israel.
So this makes Israel racist????? |
Israel is less than 60 years old. How many Jews were living there 200 years ago? Anyways the problem isn't so much giving citizenship - Israel can give citizenship to whomever it wants; the problem is 3.5 million subjects of Israel who are non-citizens. This is what makes Israel an apartheid state. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Butterfly
Joined: 02 Mar 2003 Location: Kuwait
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
sundubuman wrote: |
Butterfly,
why not answer my questions?
Does the fact that ANY human being, if they convert to Judaism, has the right to Israeli citizenship qualify Israel as a "racist, apartheid state" as leftist loonies tend to label it????
How many ancient countries (as opposed to newer, post-tribal societies like US/Canada et al) have such a mechanism to citizenship and inclusion? Look at Korea and Japan. It would be impossible for a bunch of Ecuadorian Indians to convert to Korean/Japanese and be welcomed as citizens. Not so for Israel.
So this makes Israel racist????? |
I never said that Israel was racist, I was merely pointing out that you had not dealt with counter arguments to the original point that you made, that descendendants of citizens who had originally lived in the land which is now Israel, had no connection with that land now, and have thus, no right of return.
Others, made the very valid point, that, yes, you may be right, but they certainly have a greater claim on the right to live there, than Peruvian converts, converted some suspect, with the explicit intention of filling Israel with as many non-arabs as possible, as quickly as possible. As colonists throughout the ages have done.
I think it was a very valid point, and one you have not addressed, you have preferred to pipe up with the usual 'loony left' jibes.
You have ants in your pants darling. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are they subjects of Israel , or just another nation that Israel is at war with? I would say the latter. Which makes them occupied while a war is taking place. As I said why should they not also declare that if Israel withdraws to very near 1967 borders that they will not attack? Israel should go back to very near 1967 borders , at the same time the Palestinian side ought to declare that if Israel does then the war is over. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Israel is less than 60 years old. How many Jews were living there 200 years ago? Anyways the problem isn't so much giving citizenship - Israel can give citizenship to whomever it wants; the problem is 3.5 million subjects of Israel who are non-citizens. This is what makes Israel an apartheid state. |
Quote: |
Are they subjects of Israel , or just another nation that Israel is at war with? I would say the latter. Which makes them occupied while a war is taking place. |
I have to go with the latter opinion on this one. Especially since the 'non-citizens' have their own governmental apparatus. Does the governmental apparatus have limited control? Yes. Has the governmental apparatus had ties to terrorist actions against Israel? Yes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
The 67 borders???? between Israel and Jordan???
Remember folks, there was no country of "Palestine", and the lands in question are "disputed"
Frankly, I have no idea why Israel would be willing to allow a Hamas/Fatah state in the mountains 17 km from Ben-Gurion Airport. Hopefully, it never will.
22 failed (okay maybe a few are doing all right, Qatar?) Arab states are enough. When the Arabs begin treating the Palestinians as well as Israel (yep, over a million have citizenship), Britain, and the US and Canada have, then there will be peace. Because then they will be welcomed as brothers and won't feel they have to cling to the Israeli economy.
Israel, will be able, secure in the knowledge that their babies and grandmothers won't be blown up, to finally chill out and write symphonies and novels instead of defending itself against savage murderers. One can only hope. But the Arab record of giving Arab refugees from other countries citizenship is pretty sad. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
That sounds like it would be a good idea but it's not all that easy. If my Korean neighbours were noisy I might have to go in there and keep things quiet for a while, but as long as they promise to stop banging on the walls I would prefer to go back to my place, and who cares if they forget to water the plants or feed the cat.
I think Joo has the right idea here. Let's also not forget that Palestinians and Israelis are genetic and linguistic cousins.
Good states - Bahrain, Qatar, UAE. Kuwait.
Doing all right states - Egypt, maybe Tunisia.
I've been working extra hard to make sure the Arabic Wikipedia doesn't catch up with ours. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
mithridates wrote: |
Good states - Bahrain, Qatar, UAE. Kuwait.
Doing all right states - Egypt, maybe Tunisia.
|
I'd say Morocco as well. It's more much more open politically than Tunisia and slightly more so than Egypt. I believe it as also signed a free trade agreement with the USA, but I don't know if Congress has passed it yet.
Also, Morocco has an envoy in Israel, or at least did until the least intifada. It used to host secret meetings between the Israelis and Palestinians as well.
2nd richest person in Morocco (king being #1)? A jew. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
INteresting that someone mentioned the million-plus Palestinians who have Israeli citizenship. How many of them have been suicide bombers? Only a couple. The other 3.5 million are subjects pure and simple. Israel's plan is to wall them into bantustans, and it's little wonder (though still aprehensible) that many of them resort to the violence they do. By it's apartheid vision Israel is simply ensuring that they will always have Palestinians wanting to kill them, while bringing on the hatred of the rest of the ME, hypocrits though most of the other nations are.
As I've said before, the easiest way for the US to safeguard itself against future Islamist terrorists would be to cut off funding to Israel until it withdrew to it's 1967 borders. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Summer Wine wrote:
[b][u]...(I have been drinking, so wait until I am sober and I will discuss this properly....
Quite frankly, it's hard to tell the difference. Lost tribes? Are you out of your mind? Or just drunk?_________________
I apologise, I had not read your article properly, though I had been questioning as to whether the Iraeli thought that they were a lost tribe as in the case of the converting tribe in India.
I am interested in your comment that you find my topics a little difficult. Is that all of them or just the few you disagree with. I have written some that you do not reply to at all. Is that because you really hate them and find them not worthy of discussion or what? Just Curious.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
R. S. Refugee

Joined: 29 Sep 2004 Location: Shangra La, ROK
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Summer Wine wrote: |
Summer Wine wrote:
[b][u]...(I have been drinking, so wait until I am sober and I will discuss this properly....
Quite frankly, it's hard to tell the difference. Lost tribes? Are you out of your mind? Or just drunk?_________________
I apologise, I had not read your article properly, though I had been questioning as to whether the Iraeli thought that they were a lost tribe as in the case of the converting tribe in India.
I am interested in your comment that you find my topics a little difficult. Is that all of them or just the few you disagree with. I have written some that you do not reply to at all. Is that because you really hate them and find them not worthy of discussion or what? Just Curious.  |
No, I don't ignore or not reply to anything for any predictable reason at all really. The truth is that I have very little time these days and it's a real hit or miss thing if I get involved in any discussion. Mostly what I do is post other people's words -- commentaries -- that represent ideas that I would like to promote or hear discussed.
However, I would suggest learning a little better how to use the quote functions. By using the Preview function, you can check to see if you've got the quotes marked correctly before you post.
My quote should have looked like this:
R.S. Refugee wrote: |
Quite frankly, it's hard to tell the difference. Lost tribes? Are you out of your mind? Or just drunk? |
I might not have noticed that it was a statement of mine that you were asking for feedback about without that marker though the red type did help call attention to it.
Cheers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|