Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Do you believe in the existence of a Soul?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Qinella



Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:39 am    Post subject: Re: re: Reply with quote

seoulunitarian wrote:
Qinella wrote:
The basic question I have with souls relates to population. If the population of humans on the earth is constantly increasing, where do these souls come from? Is there a celestial storage bin that deals out souls when the birth rate exceeds the death rate?

If you believe evolution and common descent, the problem compounds, because we're talking about everything starting from archae or somesuch. Do unicellular, non-nucleic organisms have souls, too? What exactly is life?

These questions are impossible to answer, and thus it is impossible to answer them for humans, as well.


My answer is that the earth is not the only populated planet in the multiverse, and souls may choose to reincarnate on various planets within the multiverse.

Peace


Okay that's fine, but it still does not answer the question of evolution, or more broadly, universe expansion. The universe, as far as we know, is constantly expanding. There must have been a point when there was no living soul, no life as we know it. Where were the souls at that time?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Material science can't understand creation of life... Evolution theory does not explain consciousness... Vedic spiritual science provides intelligent answers for those who are open to at least the possibility of supernatural causation.

The unmanifest material nature, pradhana, is impregnated with the seeds of life by the glance of Vishnu.

The universes initially expand as they are breathed out of MahaVishnu's body, but at a certain point (during his inhalation...) they begin to contract...

The time-scale of each universe is set to Brahma's lifespan of 100 of his years (each of his days is four billion, three hundred million earth years...)

At the end of Brahma's life, there is a total devastation, and all the universal energy - including the individual souls that are still in the material world - are wound back up into the body of MahaVishnu in a suspended, dormant, unmanifest state once again - until it is time for a new creation after another 100 of Brahma's years (and another empowered person plays the role of Brahma...)
http://www.answers.com/topic/hindu-cosmology

Pradhana (a concept shared/copied by Buddhism) is described as follows in the quintessential Vedic literature, Srimad Bhagavatam:

Pradhana - "In the unmanifest stage of material nature, called pradhana, there is no expression of words, no mind and no manifestation of the subtle elements beginning from the mahat, nor are there the modes of goodness, passion and ignorance. There is no life air or intelligence, nor any senses or demigods. There is no definite arrangement of planetary systems, nor are there present the different stages of consciousness - sleep, wakefulness and deep sleep. There is no ether, water, earth, air, fire or sun. The situation is just like that of complete sleep, or of voidness. Indeed, it is indescribable. Authorities in spiritual science explain, however, that since pradhana is the original substance, it is the actual basis of material creation." (SB 12.4.20-21)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
seoulunitarian



Joined: 06 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Troll_Bait wrote:
captain kirk wrote:
I heard from Big Buddhists (TM) that there are five kinds of bodies that make up a human (and other 'sentient beings' such as other animals besides humans). We humans and other beings are composite creations of these five bodies.
[ ...]


http://buddhism.about.com/cs/meditation/a/Aggregates.htm

Quote:
No Permanent Self

During his enlightenment experience, the Buddha could see no evidence for this. What he did perceive, however, was that the 'I', self, or individual personality consisted of five 'aggregates' (khandhas), namely: material form, feeling, perception, mental formations, and consciousness. None of these, according to the Buddha, either alone or as a group, constitute what might be termed a permanent self.

The Buddha is not arguing that, on a day to day level, there are not individuals with different qualities; what he is saying is that all are subject to change. In the case of material form this is easy to see. Physically, the 42 year old is not the same as the 12 year old. The way we perceive things, feeling, thoughts, even our awareness of being alive, are all subject to change. Life is a process of continual change and movement.


http://www.bartleby.com/65/bu/Buddhism.html

Quote:
Experience is analyzed into five aggregates (skandhas). The first, form (rupa), refers to material existence; the following four, sensations (vedana), perceptions (samjna), psychic constructs (samskara), and consciousness (vijnana), refer to psychological processes. The central Buddhist teaching of non-self (anatman) asserts that in the five aggregates no independently existent, immutable self, or soul, can be found. All phenomena arise in interrelation and in dependence on causes and conditions, and thus are subject to inevitable decay and cessation.


seoulunitarian wrote:
Qinella wrote:

The basic question I have with souls relates to population. If the population of humans on the earth is constantly increasing, where do these souls come from? Is there a celestial storage bin that deals out souls when the birth rate exceeds the death rate?

If you believe evolution and common descent, the problem compounds, because we're talking about everything starting from archae or somesuch. Do unicellular, non-nucleic organisms have souls, too? What exactly is life?

These questions are impossible to answer, and thus it is impossible to answer them for humans, as well.


My answer is that the earth is not the only populated planet in the multiverse, and souls may choose to reincarnate on various planets within the multiverse.


So as the earth's population is increasing, that means that populations elsewhere are decreasing?


Or that the Universal Spirit is continuing to manifest in more forms.

Peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoulunitarian



Joined: 06 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:21 am    Post subject: Re: re: Reply with quote

Qinella wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
Qinella wrote:
The basic question I have with souls relates to population. If the population of humans on the earth is constantly increasing, where do these souls come from? Is there a celestial storage bin that deals out souls when the birth rate exceeds the death rate?

If you believe evolution and common descent, the problem compounds, because we're talking about everything starting from archae or somesuch. Do unicellular, non-nucleic organisms have souls, too? What exactly is life?

These questions are impossible to answer, and thus it is impossible to answer them for humans, as well.


My answer is that the earth is not the only populated planet in the multiverse, and souls may choose to reincarnate on various planets within the multiverse.

Peace


Okay that's fine, but it still does not answer the question of evolution, or more broadly, universe expansion. The universe, as far as we know, is constantly expanding. There must have been a point when there was no living soul, no life as we know it. Where were the souls at that time?


Within the Universal Spirit, as they are even now, and as everything has always been and always will be.

Peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoulunitarian



Joined: 06 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:26 am    Post subject: elaboration Reply with quote

Everything that exists does so within the confines of the Universal Spirit. The Universal Spirit is ALL that exists, and everything is part of that Spirit. Nothing exists outside the Universal Spirit.

The physical multiverse is simply the expression of the mind of the Spirit (in order to believe this, you would have to believe that mind is not dependent on chemical reactions within the brain). You, I, and the household cat are expressions/souls of the Universal Spirit. Sometimes there are more expressions and sometimes fewer (as when some souls are drawn back into reunion with the Spirit).

The Spirit expands and contracts eternally, so the singularity from which our specific universe began is simply the beginning of Spirit manifestation in our 3D reality. The Spirit manifests in other universes as well. Though it appears that the universe will expand indefinitely, it will actually contract (some physicists still believe this), and the process of Spirit manifestation will begin again. It is an endless cycle.

Peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Absolute Truth may be realized in three features: as impersonal, all-pervading formless spirit (Brahman), as the localized supersoul or "Supreme Soul" present in everyone's heart (Paramatma), and as the ultimate personal feature (Bhagavan or Krishna).

The following is from a Srimad Bhagavatam purport written by foremost devotional Vedic scholar Bhaktivedanta Swami:

The Supreme Being's manifest form is explained in the Vedas as sat-cit-ananda vigraha, "an embodiment (vigraha) of absolute eternity (sat), absolute cognizance (cit), and absolute bliss (ananda)." Impersonal Brahman realization is the realization of His sat (being) feature. Paramatma realization is the realization of cit (eternal knowledge). But realization of the Personality of Godhead, Krsna, is realization of all the transcendental features: sat, cit and ananda (being, knowledge, bliss) in complete vigraha (form).


The Absolute Personality may also be understood as the perfect person who has manifold energies, out of which the internal, external and marginal energies are primary. The spiritual world is the manifestation of the Lord's internal potency. By expanding his internal energies, He manifests as so many personalities, and exchanges or accepts transcendental loving service from them in the spiritual world. The material world is the manifestation of His external potency. The living entities are manifestations of His marginal potency, and by their own choice they can live in either the transcendental or material worlds...

http://www.harekrsna.com/philosophy/truth/truth.htm





[/url]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Grimalkin



Joined: 22 May 2005

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

seoulunitarian where do your ideas on the soul come from and how confident are you in them?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
otis



Joined: 02 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm a big believer is the soul.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoulunitarian



Joined: 06 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:55 pm    Post subject: re: Reply with quote

Grimalkin wrote:
seoulunitarian where do your ideas on the soul come from and how confident are you in them?


They come mostly from my extraterrestrial guide, and I'm fairly confident in them.

Peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Soul" is a metaphor for some unknown.

I think it is incorrect to think of the soul in the terms we would for ego. Personal identity and soul are not the same. The personal identity at best is like a shadow of the soul.

We can think of the ego in terms of space and time. The soul is said to be eternal. Therefore, since all discursive thought requires the categories of space and time, and since the eternal has nothing to do with time, we cannot properly think about soul.

Therfore, there is a danger in the question. It is insufficient. To answer the question, the question must be left behind--paradoxically.

No answer which the question can possibly yield is sufficient. To be satisfied with any answer to the question of "is there as soul" would be to mistake the finger pointing at the moon with the moon.

Any ideas, therefore, must be negated and the mind silenced. Otherwise, we confuse ideas with reality, which is illusion.

Only direct experience of reality will do. Otherwise we're left only with questions, or worse: answers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grimalkin



Joined: 22 May 2005

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:52 am    Post subject: Re: re: Reply with quote

seoulunitarian wrote:
Grimalkin wrote:
seoulunitarian where do your ideas on the soul come from and how confident are you in them?


They come mostly from my extraterrestrial guide, and I'm fairly confident in them.

Peace



mmm....what kind of response do you usually get from people when you mention your extraterrestrial guide?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Grimalkin



Joined: 22 May 2005

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Only direct experience of reality will do.



Do you mean thro' some form of buddhist meditation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
seoulunitarian



Joined: 06 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:11 am    Post subject: Re: re: Reply with quote

Grimalkin wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
Grimalkin wrote:
seoulunitarian where do your ideas on the soul come from and how confident are you in them?


They come mostly from my extraterrestrial guide, and I'm fairly confident in them.

Peace



mmm....what kind of response do you usually get from people when you mention your extraterrestrial guide?


Surprisingly enough, it's usually either neutral or positive (at least to my face^^).

Peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Buddha's appearance and mission were accurately predicted in the Vedic literature Srimad-Bhagavatam. Part of his mission was to bewilder atheists and trick them into following an empowered incarnation of God - himself. Technically, the voidist philosophy he propagated is atheistic because he denied the authority of the Vedas. However, that was justified at the time by the widespread misuse of Vedic rituals dealing with animal sacrifices. Out of compassion for the suffering of poor animals, he created a philosophy based on ahingsa (nonviolence...)

Because of Buddha's "silence" about many metaphysical topics (such as creation...) many interpretations of his philosophy were formed, especially after his disappearance. Essential similarities between the teachings of Buddha and the Vedas are nicely discussed in this article:
http://www.stephen-knapp.com/buddhism_and_its_vedic_connections.htm

In India, Buddhism was eventually defeated philosophically - and Vedic authority restored - by Shankar acharya (an incarnation of Lord Shiva...) However, his impersonalist philosophy, considering nondifferentiated Brahman to be the highest truth, was very similar to the concept of nirvana...

Vaishnava acharyas (exemplary spiritual teachers) Ramanuja, Madhva and Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabu established the personalist understanding that the highest realization of the absolute truth is the Supreme Person (Bhagavan or Krishna...)

Since I - as a seeker of ultimate truth - have not found any philosophy superior to what Krishna speaks in Bhagavad-gita, I accept what He states about the soul to be authoritative, re-spoken by the original source of the Vedas and all incarnations - which I think ultimately trumps silence (and science...)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grimalkin wrote:
Quote:
Only direct experience of reality will do.



Do you mean thro' some form of buddhist meditation.


Through meditation, yes, so long as we do not become attached to a method. That is getting stuck at the level of ego and idea again.

I have been exploring entertaining no beliefs. (I hear the objections already. But in perfect silence, it's possible.)

Belief and faith are different. Belief is always in an idea. This is not necessarily so with faith. Indeed, it takes faith to move into that vast emptiness. Belief is a disturbance, a blasting war trumpet, in the silence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International