| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Can you demonstrate that I am wrong?
Can you demonstrate that you ARE seriously interested in considering other people's viewpoints? Other than those of people who already agree with you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
Can you demonstrate that I am wrong?
Can you demonstrate that you ARE seriously interested in considering other people's viewpoints? Other than those of people who already agree with you? |
I do not need to demonstrate that you are wrong. When are you going to get it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| regicide wrote: |
He could do that by letting this thing rest. But he has made the decision not to do that.
MOS-- Prove the SBT is true or admit that it is false or stand down.
I do not have to prove a thing. You have to prove that the SBT is true.
We ( have been) waiting for your decision. Now either pony up or shut up. |
Why should I answer this question, or any other question that you offer, if you can't demonstrate that you're willing to seriously and honestly consider my answer?
So far, the faster anybody answers your question(s), the faster you can dismiss them without consideration. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| regicide wrote: |
He could do that by letting this thing rest. But he has made the decision not to do that.
MOS-- Prove the SBT is true or admit that it is false or stand down.
I do not have to prove a thing. You have to prove that the SBT is true.
We ( have been) waiting for your decision. Now either pony up or shut up. |
Why should I answer this question, or any other question that you offer, if you can't demonstrate that you're willing to seriously and honestly consider my answer?
So far, the faster anybody answers your question(s), the faster you can dismiss them without consideration. |
Absolute nonsense - - double talk. Your posts have no merit - - you are ignored. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| regicide wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
Can you demonstrate that I am wrong?
Can you demonstrate that you ARE seriously interested in considering other people's viewpoints? Other than those of people who already agree with you? |
I do not need to demonstrate that you are wrong. When are you going to get it? |
I see.
So basically you are saying that you don't need to demonstrate that you're seriously interested in considering other people's viewpoints.
Basically you are saying that you're not interested in other people's viewpoints. At all.
You're saying, basically, "I'm going to start a thread called, 'New Evidence Suggests Second Shooter Killed RFK', and I don't give a shit how anybody responds."
Last edited by Manner of Speaking on Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So you're admitting that Gopher and I are right, aren't you?
Last edited by Manner of Speaking on Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Have I misunderstood what you just said? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anybody who is reading this, have I misunderstood what regicide just said? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You've gone quiet. Is there something wrong? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Looks like he's gone for the day. Oh well... * poof * |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| Looks like he's gone for the day. Oh well... * poof * |
Good grief...
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| regicide wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
Can you demonstrate that I am wrong?
Can you demonstrate that you ARE seriously interested in considering other people's viewpoints? Other than those of people who already agree with you? |
I do not need to demonstrate that you are wrong. When are you going to get it? |
I see.
So basically you are saying that you don't need to demonstrate that you're seriously interested in considering other people's viewpoints.
Basically you are saying that you're not interested in other people's viewpoints. At all.
You're saying, basically, "I'm going to start a thread called, 'New Evidence Suggests Second Shooter Killed RFK', and I don't give a shit how anybody responds." |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| So you're admitting that Gopher and I are right, aren't you? |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| Have I misunderstood what you just said? |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| Anybody who is reading this, have I misunderstood what regicide just said? |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| You've gone quiet. Is there something wrong? |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| Looks like he's gone for the day. Oh well... * poof * |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u56m2m3eH0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| regicide wrote: |
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u56m2m3eH0 |
Ah, there you are. You disappeared so suddenly this morning, I wondered what happened.
Thanks for the link to the Youtube video. But I'm not sure what you are trying to say here, as the topic of the thread - your thread - is the RFK assasination, not the JFK one.
So should we get back to our earlier discussion now?
| First, I wrote: |
Can you demonstrate that I am wrong?
Can you demonstrate that you ARE seriously interested in considering other people's viewpoints? Other than those of people who already agree with you? |
| ...and then you wrote: |
| I do not need to demonstrate that you are wrong. When are you going to get it? |
| ...and then I wrote: |
I see.
So basically you are saying that you don't need to demonstrate that you're seriously interested in considering other people's viewpoints.
Basically you are saying that you're not interested in other people's viewpoints. At all.
You're saying, basically, "I'm going to start a thread called, 'New Evidence Suggests Second Shooter Killed RFK', and I don't give a shit how anybody responds." |
I think that's where we left off.
Are you, in fact, saying that Gopher and I are right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think you and Gopher are the same person; or at least equally disturbed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bacasper
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| regicide wrote: |
| I think you and Gopher are the same person; or at least equally disturbed. |
I thought Gopher was Ya-ta Boy. On my other thread, I asked Ya-ta a question, but Gopher responded! Neither has yet answered the critical question however as is usual. They just like to criticize and hurl epithets, but offer no explanations of their own.
MOS: What part of
did you not understand? Or do you just enjoy beating a dead horse? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Regicide has been beating a horse that has been dead for, oh, nigh on 45 years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
