|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
shifty
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
PBR streetgang 21, I really admire yr intellect and I agree with everything you say. But I think you're wasting yr time with this lot, who aren't really up to it and are not worthy of yr efforts.
Long may you live!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PBRstreetgang21

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Location: Orlando, FL--- serving as man's paean to medocrity since 1971!
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok Itaewonguy I think we are going on two streams of thought here, on the one had we have weather religion is god or bad, and on the other we have the existence of God.
I think on the former, I am going to call it quits. The fact of the matter is I feel I have presented a fairly adequate case to show why religion has been a malignant force. To say nothing of what basic history text books teach and to say nothing of the fact that a great many religious leaders even attest to the atrocities of religion. If you cannot accept that even among religious people, the true totalitarian aspects of religion are in no way in dispute I cannot continue this. Especially condering I have yet to hear you respond to the question, what moral act can a religious person than a non-religious person cannot person, and its corallary, what evil act can a religious person perform than a non religous could not. Im sorry but that question pretty much makes my case.
Now to the latter: You insist that SCIENCE is creating scenarios. Science is not creating ANYTHING. Science is merely analyzing the available facts to explain the origins of our existence. Science is not in the business of proving or disproving God, its in the business of explaining how things work, and it explains a great deal of how our universe and humans work. It has reached the point however where it says the universe works, if there is a God if there is not a God science makes no answer, it presumes nothing, it is HUMBLE on the matter. All science says, there is no reason why one should suppose there is a God. We live in a capricious and chaotic universe. Billions of stars and galaxies are being destroyed as we speak, our sun is a ticking time bomb waiting to explode and annhilate us all, our planet which is the only one that can support life, because most of the other rocks in our solar system are to hot or too cold or too poisonous to do so, is still cooling and settling and wreaking havoc on the creatures that live here. 98% of all species ever having existed have been extinct and passed on. We are lcuky we even made it to where we are, considering not just the chaos of our planet but considering that scientists have pretty much determined that humans have existed for somewhere between 200-100,000 years for most of which time we were killing eachother, dying of disease, die from simple tooth injuries and animals. Falls would kill us, and if you made it 25-30 you were lucky. We exist on a very sharp precipice and if we are not careful we can easily push or be pushed by natural occurance off of it. These are the facts. Incontravertable. Now science says, this is this. Someone else now comes along and says, "No this isnt chaos, this isnt destruction, this is perfect and someone made it!" I mean to believe that the arbitrary and cruel universe was designed this way implies either a very stupid, or very malicious creator. Thats if you assume one exists, and why should you; on what basis? But not only people insist that this was the handiwork of a higher being (which to do so you really have you work cut out for you) they insist they know what this being wants of us. They no what sexual positions he likes us to use, what he likes us to eat, what body parts are ok to touch, what language is permissable to use, how we should treat those of different colors, etc etc. To believe that this was designed this way is a massive leap, but to go from that to "we know his thought process?" I cannot think of anything more perposterous, malignant, or MADE UP than that. Its hucksterism, and yet you are insisting that SCIENCE is making scenarios? Seriously?
Science does explain and proves quite well how we came to exist, how we came to talk, and walk, and breathe, and all that jazz. There are unanswered questions, but not as many as you think, and the ones that have been answered--- have nothing to with a God.
Im glad we can agree it needs to stay out of public life though and we do recognize individuals rights to believe and practice as they see fit. I would heed your suggestion to write to my congressman, except there is one problem--- my congressman thinks that teaching creationism is Gods will, and Gods will is more important than the US Constitution to him. This is the problem. Religion cannot keep itself out of the public square. It never does, and it never will. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I actually do like the Dalai Lama. However, there are many great spiritual authors out there. The Dalai Lama seems like a decent person. I don't have a bad impression of him. I can't say I've really have been very interested in his books. I took some good ideas from them, however. I did like Yogananda's book "Autobiography of a Yogi". It was an interesting read. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PBRstreetgang21 wrote: |
The fact of the matter is I feel I have presented a fairly adequate case to show why religion has been a malignant force.
|
I disagree and so do the BILLIONS of people who attend a mosque or a church daily and pray! So do the people whose daily routine is to attend church light candles and pray for others! You are speaking of corrupt governments in the past who used the name of GOD as an excuse to kill
I am talking about ordinary citizens who harm no one hang a crucifix in their living room and give thanks at supper time!
| Quote: |
what moral act can a religious person than a non-religious person cannot person, and its corallary, what evil act can a religious person perform than a non religous could not. I�m sorry but that question pretty much makes my case.
|
Jesus Christ dude! That has no importance what so ever!
But to answer it, how about this!
A religious person can pray for god�s forgiveness with true heart!
A non religious man cannot!
A religious person answers to a higher source and is more inclined to be a better person for belief in after death consequences...
A non religious man doesn�t worry about that
An Atheist can kill someone and not fear consequences
A religious man does... (Of course we have exceptions to the rule) please don�t focus on a few religious extremists ok...
| Quote: |
| Now to the latter: You insist that SCIENCE is creating scenarios. Science is not creating ANYTHING. Science is merely analyzing the available facts to explain the origins of our existence. |
Yes and the facts are missing substantial pieces of the puzzle so they fill them in with probabilities and possibly theories. Sorry you can�t deny this!
If you do then you are blinded! We are talking about the million dollar question here not all science ok! Don�t get confused..
| Quote: |
| Science is not in the business of proving or disproving God |
That�s what theists and atheists do
| Quote: |
| These are the facts. Incontravertable. Now science says, this is this. Someone else now comes along and says, "No this isnt chaos, this isnt destruction, this is perfect and someone made it!" I mean to believe that the arbitrary and cruel universe was designed this way implies either a very stupid, or very malicious creator. Thats if you assume one exists, and why should you; on what basis? But not only people insist that this was the handiwork of a higher being (which to do so you really have you work cut out for you) they insist they know what this being wants of us. They no what sexual positions he likes us to use, what he likes us to eat, what body parts are ok to touch, what language is permissable to use, how we should treat those of different colors, etc etc. To believe that this was designed this way is a massive leap, but to go from that to "we know his thought process?" I cannot think of anything more perposterous, malignant, or MADE UP than that. Its hucksterism, and yet you are insisting that SCIENCE is making scenarios? Seriously? |
Again you go way too far!
Everything that has happened due to our own evolution is arguable our own creation! But let�s go to the root of it all! The spark which started it all
If god did create this place! He didn�t create your sexual preference or your preferred color! Those can be random! (MAYBE we can�t be sure now can we, maybe we are all programmed robots) but anyway..
The argument is not why god lets children die in Africa or why god keeps disease here. That many creationist and Deists believe that billions of years ago God created the universe he provided the ingredients for life to begin and perhaps that same god is fueling our universe with the ingredients it needs to grow! We will never know of course because it�s such an impossible equation to fathom we can�t even comprehend the root of it
Humans disbelieve god because our little brains cannot figure out the possibilities of his existence. Hey maybe there is no god, I don�t care!
But the arguments between Atheists and Theists are still fair!
| Quote: |
| Science does explain and proves quite well how we came to exist, how we came to talk, and walk, and breathe, and all that jazz. |
Ummm no it doesn�t! Seriously it doesn�t! It has an assumption!
That�s all it has... just like oh god did it... scientists say stuff like well
You see there was this monkey! And then there was another monkey bla blar blar we have this bone! We have theory based on fossil evidence means it�s very likely that WELL YES! We can see where we came from but can we really know how its possible consciousness is here! NO! Science is still working on that! I am there for I am!
| Quote: |
There are unanswered questions, but not as many as you think, and the ones that have been answered--- have nothing to with a God.
|
Nothing to do with god because those questions were not about god!
| Quote: |
| would heed your suggestion to write to my congressman, except there is one problem--- my congressman thinks that teaching creationism is Gods will, and Gods will is more important than the US Constitution to him. This is the problem |
How can so many well educated people in the world! Geniuses, PHDS, you name it world leaders spent their lives in the library and studying in high school, read every book! All be so blinded and believe in such a thing as god? Can you answer me this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Hale

Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Location: the Straight Talk Express
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Christopher Hitchens wrote: |
| In exactly the same way as a medieval princeling, the Dalai Lama makes the claim not just that Tibet should be independent of Chinese hegemony but that he himself is a hereditary king appointed by Heaven itself. Dissenting sects within his faith are persecuted; his one-man rule is absolute; he makes absurd pronouncements about sex and diet and, when on his trips to Hollywood fundraisers, anoints major donors like Steven Segal and Richard Gere as holy and of high enlightenment. I will admit that the "Dalai" (supreme) Lama is a man of some charm and presence, as I will admit that the present queen of England is a person of more integrity than most of her predecessors, but this does not invalidate the critique of hereditary monarchy. The first foreign visitors to Tibet were downright appalled at the feudal domination and hideous punishments that kept the population in permanent serfdom to a parasitic monastic elite. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adios4ca
Joined: 09 Sep 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="itaewonguy"]
| adios4ca wrote: |
| Quote: |
| thank god for those who didn't believe in you. without those folks, we will still think that sun circles around the earth, and snakes can talk. |
Ohhh the arrogance of man!! Gotta love it!
So you think all the questions have been answered huh!
We are so far from the ideas it�s impossible to comprehend it!
You need to ask yourself some serious questions! and stop quoting Hitchens! |
No I thnink the fundamental difference between you and me is:
I believe science should and would provide answers to all the questions.
I admit nowadays schience could not yet.
But scientists are working on that.
You believe there is a god to provide answers to all the questions.
And you rest on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adios4ca
Joined: 09 Sep 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| itaewonguy wrote: |
I am not the one who needs convincing! Why don�t you write a letter to your congressmen! I mean you present a good argument no reason they shouldn�t believe you. I mean they are educated people right?
The evidence is over whelming how can they not see it? |
wrong! wrong assumption!
someone is educated, does not mean he or she has the capability to think independently.
independent thinking capability, gets nothing to do with his or her degree.
i have seen Ph.D in physics falling for cults - one of my female classmates. she is smart, maybe, on her physics, but utterly stupid, in my opinion, on anything else.
and unfortunately, those congressmen are not exactly the type of intellectuals i would expect. not to say all their actions are twisted by their political motivations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| adios4ca wrote: |
[
I believe science should and would provide answers to all the questions.
I admit nowadays schience could not yet.
But scientists are working on that.
You believe there is a god to provide answers to all the questions.
And you rest on it. |
NO I dont! IM arguing that its a possibility! big difference..
hey I am all for science! I am an Agnostic , after all I want answers!
christianity are waiting for gods second coming! science is working everyday every minute to prove otherwise!
science hasnt yet proven it but IM hoping they do.. until then the idea of god is still a strong probability.
hey BTW I am a huge fan of old movies, I usually watch one a night..
I came across this classic movie called
Elmer Gantry
its with Burt Lancaster and its about selling christianity across the states
burt plays a fast talking christian salesmen.. interesting movie funny that the subject was about religion, I didnt know it I just like old movies. but anyway well worth the watch not just for burts great acting but just to see how simple Americans were dealing with christianity and Athiesm
you can find it at isohunt..
I recommend it to all people interested in seeing how religion is sold especially in the 40's and 50's |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Justin Hale wrote: |
| Christopher Hitchens wrote: |
| In exactly the same way as a medieval princeling, the Dalai Lama makes the claim not just that Tibet should be independent of Chinese hegemony but that he himself is a hereditary king appointed by Heaven itself. Dissenting sects within his faith are persecuted; his one-man rule is absolute; he makes absurd pronouncements about sex and diet and, when on his trips to Hollywood fundraisers, anoints major donors like Steven Segal and Richard Gere as holy and of high enlightenment. I will admit that the "Dalai" (supreme) Lama is a man of some charm and presence, as I will admit that the present queen of England is a person of more integrity than most of her predecessors, but this does not invalidate the critique of hereditary monarchy. The first foreign visitors to Tibet were downright appalled at the feudal domination and hideous punishments that kept the population in permanent serfdom to a parasitic monastic elite. |
|
Consider the source. Christopher Hitchens is an antitheist, so it's no surprise that he writes so scathingly about a religious leader. If you read the passage again, you'll notice that he grudgingly praises the Dalai Lama but goes on a rant against an alternate universe, Dalai-Lama-that-could-have-been, instead of the one that is.
| Alexander Linklater wrote: |
| And there is an undertow of violence in his [Hitchens'] arguments, an inability to empathise. He is, for example, incurious about what religious belief feels like, or what meaning it has for millions of people ... |
And he seems to be no angel himself.
| Alexander Cockburn wrote: |
| What a truly disgusting sack of s**t Hitchens is [� a] guy who called Sid Blumenthal one of his best friends and then tried to have him thrown into prison for perjury; a guy who waited [until] his friend Edward Said was on his death bed before attacking him in the Atlantic Monthly; a guy who knows perfectly well the role Israel plays in US policy but who does not scruple to flail Cindy Sheehan as a LaRouchie and Anti-Semite because, maybe, she dared mention the word Israel. |
PBRstreetgang21:
I think you're too hard on religion. Splitting the atom can be used to generate heat and electricity, or to vaporize a city. Religion can motivate people to commit inquisitions or terrorist attacks, or to help disaster victims.
| Quote: |
| [W]hat moral act can a religious person than a non-religious person cannot person, and its corallary, what evil act can a religious person perform than a non religous could not[?] I'm sorry but that question pretty much makes my case. |
That works the other way, too. You acknowledge that religious people do good deeds, and thus, that religion cannot be such a malevolent force that it extinguishes good in people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PBRstreetgang21

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Location: Orlando, FL--- serving as man's paean to medocrity since 1971!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Itaewonguy:
Please present me with argument that has some basis in the reality in which live, using firm evidence to suppose the existence of God. You have only given me only mental suppositions. Thats all I have ever heard. Thats why I quit the debates on nature of trinity, put my Liturgy of the Hours on the shelf, took my last communion, lit my last candle, and realized try as I might I could never go to seminary after graduation and be a priest like I had always dreamed (but I could teach english in Korea!). There is nothing prove the existence of God other than the purest of conjecture.
There are many intelligent people in this world who do belive in God and are religious. But the higher a persons intelligence, and the more qualified they are, the more degrees they have, the more likely you are to find that they are very nebulous in their piety. "Well I dont think Moses REALLY parted the Red Sea...." "Jesus didnt REALLY bring Lazarus back..." etc, ect.
You get so much "well I think what they were REALLY trying to say"
Life of Brian: "Blessed are the peacemakers!"
| Quote: |
Man: I think it was, "Blessed are the cheesemakers"!
Gregory's wife: What's so special about the cheesemakers?
Gregory: Well, obviously it's not meant to be taken literally. It refers to any manufacturers of dairy products. |
The higher you go in the education department the less likely you are to believe in organized religion and the less likely the supporters of organized religion are actually going to believe what there religions says to begin with. I dont think its a coincidence that most Nobel prize winners in the sciences are athiests at far greater numbers than exist in a place like Nigeria. Where people are killed for changing their religion.
Which ties into the behavior standpoint. I do aknowledge that religious people do both good and bad things, however my point is that no rleigion does anything moral that you couldnt do if you were an athiest. Itaewonguy said a relgious person can pray for their own forgiveness. Thats a fallacy for several reasons.
1. As an athiest I can pray to Buddha or hell I can pray to Winston Churchill to forgive my sins. I dont need a God.
2. Supposing there is a God, all the major religions in THEIR OWN HOLY BOOKS. Talk of a God who kills and orders the rape of women and children for being of a different tribe. Thats not extremism when its coming from the foundational texts. When God told moses to slay the children of the Amalekites and save the virgin girls for rape in the book or Numbers thats not "using religious extremists to denegrate the rest" THATS THE BOOK THAT IS THE FOUNDATION.
It is Jesus, and St. Paul who speak of eternal torment for people not based on their moral righteousness but based on the acceptence of a historical event. A event pray tell that supposedly indicts me in a horrific way for murder I did not ask for and if did would have refused.
A God that tells Muhammed to slay those who do not believe, and punish adulterous women with stoning. Who approved Muhammeds marriage to a 7yr old girl.
Asking anyone of these characters is tantamount to asking Charles Manson for forgiveness. If you haved sinned against another, why a third party is doing the forgiving is beyond me. But if you are going to pray to a 3rd party the likes of which seems this deranged and violent you may as well go for one you know exists.
3. This to me is the real proof where praying to God for forgivness actually constitutes an immoral act. The fact is you sinned againts THAT person, and therefor you must get forgivness from him. To get it from GOD means to say that whether that person forgives you or not is secondary, which ties into the education argument I made earlier.
It was mentioned earlier that religious people can behave better because they have a reward/punishment system and someone to accountable to.
This is wrong.
This is so wrong I thought I was going to have seizure when I read it.
Lets take one of the most religious societies in the world, and the society I know the best, mine, the USA.
In the US, time and time again, studies have show that the places that ae the most religious have the highest rates of theft, teen pregnancy, abortion, violent crime, and are the least education. They also give the least amount of money to charity (although this has more to do with fact that the poorer a person is the more likely they are to be religious than those with money, and by proxy those with more money are better educated and those with less education are poor--- VERY STRANGE INDEED).
The places giving the most amount of money, the places far better educated, the places with less crime, less tenn pregnancy, less abortion, are all places that wait for it-- HAVE THE LEAST AMOUNT OF RELIGIOUS PARTCIPATION!
Look at the wealthiest, most education countries in the world, with cleanest systems of government, and the highest qualities of life, are all SECULAR countries with dwindling church numbers, and who are generally not inclined to religion. They are also the most charitable countries in the world as well. Do people like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet and George Soros give gobs of money and say "We did it for Jesus, Krishna, Muhammad, "insert invisible man here"". Atheists often do the right thing because its moral! I find it a tad demeaning to think that our ancestors in the desert needed moses to hammered out "dont kill, dont lie, dont steal" for us to know its wrong. We have plenty of great moral teachings that are sans religion-- just look at Spinoza! The UN and Doctors without Borders to more humanitarian work that just about any religion on the earth with a lot less money to boot-- and both are secular
Human solidarity can take you a long way in this world. I dont kill that ajumma who is driving me up the wall on the subway A) because I dont want someone to kill me when Im being annoying and B) we ve agreed as a community we cant do that shit hence laws.
Now lets look at the most religious countries, Im sure we can see how religion is making them behave-- Saudia Arabia, Afghanastan, Iran, Nigeria, Brazil, Mexico, Pakistan, Serbia, oh I can go on. Countries that commite a variety of crimes, from stoning people because of their sexual orientation, mistreating their women, abusing their children, teaching them to hate and kill others for their cultural differences, and so on and so forth.
No the problem with the hell thing is no matter who you are its never YOU that are going, its someone else. Of course where do you ascertain this moral superioty--- your religion. So now its ok to kill others, to be cheap, to molest kids, to support ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, or the burning of trains fill of muslims in Bombay, stone Gay boys to death, or scrape away the gentials of your little girl, or force a woman to be burned to death on her husbands funeral pyre just because he died and for no other reason. Because YOUR not going to hell, THEY ARE, and therefore YOU have a moral superioty and a right to inflict gods will on others. After all look what God has commanded the faithful to do
Athieism doesnt kill people for changing religious beliefs
Athieism doesnt scrape away the genitals of little girls
Atheism doesnt beat little boys to death because they like other little boys
Atheism doesnt burn windows to death because their husbands died
Atheiesm doesnt suicide bomb
and I can keep the list up.
These are crimes of religion.
Yet for all the good that religious people have done they havent done anything that athiests couldnt, havent, and dont do.
Yet they have done a lot, and still do a lot of bad things in this world that only they could ever have conceived.
indulge me the pleasure of quoting a better man than I once more, Nobel prize winning physicist Steven Weinberg:
| Quote: |
| "Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." |
Only with religion could that bitch Mother Teresa convince half the world to support her while she took hundreds of millions of dollars from brutal dictators who stole it from the poor, and that she then used to open more convents insteas of hospitals so she could preach that AIDS was bad but condoms where more evil, and watch as thousands died in her "Care" (if thats what you could call it) of curable illness that she CHOSE not to give them medical care even though she had the money because she thought their poverty was "beautiful". Hell and the best part was it turned out-- SHE DIDNT EVEN BELIEVE IN GOD.
Socrates didnt religion, and neither did Lincoln or Jefferson, and neither did Spinoza or Einstein, or a whole host of great moral people in this world. Neither does anythone else. But just like no one stops me from smoking I wont stop you from believeing-- just get the hell away from the school, and the government, and the sidewalk, and my hungover sunday mornings. Keep it your bedroom, under your pillow, next to the tooth you have in waiting for the fairy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Hale

Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Location: the Straight Talk Express
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
The quote I used was from God is not great; how religion poisons everything, so yeah, I know.
| Troll Bait wrote: |
| If you read the passage again, you'll notice that he grudgingly praises the Dalai Lama but goes on a rant against an alternate universe, Dalai-Lama-that-could-have-been, instead of the one that is. |
What evidence is available that supports this claim?
| troll Bait wrote: |
| Alexander Linklater wrote: |
| And there is an undertow of violence in his [Hitchens'] arguments, an inability to empathise. He is, for example, incurious about what religious belief feels like, or what meaning it has for millions of people ... |
And he seems to be no angel himself.
| Alexander Cockburn wrote: |
| What a truly disgusting sack of s**t Hitchens is [� a] guy who called Sid Blumenthal one of his best friends and then tried to have him thrown into prison for perjury; a guy who waited [until] his friend Edward Said was on his death bed before attacking him in the Atlantic Monthly; a guy who knows perfectly well the role Israel plays in US policy but who does not scruple to flail Cindy Sheehan as a LaRouchie and Anti-Semite because, maybe, she dared mention the word Israel. |
|
ad hominem |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|