|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
arjuna
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:16 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| bacasper wrote: |
| arjuna wrote: |
How could there have been any remains? The report on the remains of the passengers was fake. |
Got a link? |
My deduction. I don't know of one that confirms it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| arjuna wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| arjuna wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| It is impossible for someone [1] to have commandeered Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, [2] dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours. Agreed? |
1. That is very simple. It could also have been done in other ways. |
Such as? |
The flight never existed, most probably.
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| Quote: |
| 2. This was not necessary, and it was not done. |
So you agree with me that the human remains found at the site were actually the passengers/victims of the hijacking and crash...? |
How could there have been any remains? The report on the remains of the passengers was fake. |
Right.  That's like saying the 911 terrorist attack never happened because the World Trade Center never really existed, it was just a conspiracy by the government to make millions of people believe it existed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
deleted by MOS
Last edited by Manner of Speaking on Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bacasper
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
What, there is only one alternative???
And if it is possible it must be true???
Like I said, I'd be very interested to know if anyone else follows this logic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arjuna
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| And since it was physically impossible, the alternative - that Flight 77 really was hijacked by Al-Quaeda terrorists - must be true. Primarily because it is physically possible to hijack a plane, and fly it into the Pentagon. |
I hope you are not expecting me to continue this "discussion."
In any case, congratulations on your conclusions. I don't know what else to say at this late hour... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bacasper
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It is not even worth it anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
duplicate post
Last edited by Manner of Speaking on Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manner of Speaking
Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bacasper wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
Why did I respond to your question?
Because you said you don't understand the logic in the discussion. |
Let's read carefully now. What is asked was if anyone else followed your logic here. Doesn't look good for you so far.
But since you are going to insist on explaining it anyway, knock yourself out. Let's say it is impossible. So what? |
Okay. If it was physically impossible for someone to have commandeered Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours, then there must be some other explanation for the events that took place at the Pentagon.
Is it physically impossible for a group of men to hijack a plane? No.
Then, if it is physically possible for a terrorist group to hijack one plane, is it possible for them to have hijacked all four? Yes.
Then, if it was physically impossible for the attack on the Pentagon to have been a hoax cooked up by the government, then how could a "controlled demolition of the World Trade Center towers" - a much more difficult task, be possible? The latter is more difficult than the former.
If one was physically impossible, then the other was even more physically impossible.
So, because the government conspiracy hypothesis is physically impossible - both the Pentagon attack and the WTC attack - something else must have happened, something that was physically possible. And there is no evidence that anything else physically possible happened other than the Al-Quaeda hijackings.
So the 911 government conspiracy hypothesis - and every iteration of it - is false.
Thank you for answering my question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
