Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Time Magazine on South Korea's English Teachers HIV/AIDS
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sojusucks



Joined: 31 May 2008

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remember, too, that Time Magazine is a widely-read magazine. There's no ignoring the situation, now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NYC_Gal 2.0



Joined: 10 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:18 am    Post subject: Re: Time Magazine on South Korea's English Teachers HIV/AIDS Reply with quote

stevieg4ever wrote:
In fact how can anyone speak for most people.


I speak for most people when I say that clean drinking water is the business.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Junior



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Location: the eye

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sojusucks wrote:
Remember, too, that Time Magazine is a widely-read magazine. There's no ignoring the situation, now.


I don't know...
They ignored the genocide in Rwanda and Darfur. Widespread honor killings and abuses of women in Palestine/Gaza. Political killings in Zimbabwe. Human rights abuses in eritrea, saudi arabia, north korea and yemen.

So I somehow doubt the world community is going to be up in arms at HIV tests in Korea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NYC_Gal 2.0



Joined: 10 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jvalmer wrote:
geldedgoat wrote:
E-2s are those who have not proven their Korean ethnicity.

E-2's are for foreign language instructors, nothing to do with ethnicity. If you happen to be an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, then you'll get an E-2. If you're not an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, you'll get an E-2. Again, ethnicity has nothing to do with getting an E-2.

geldedgoat wrote:
F-4s are those who have. F-2s are those who have proven they're 'Korean enough' by marrying an ethnic Korean. Clearly ethnicity has a lot to do with it.

I wasn't arguing about these class of visas, you are right some of the F-class visas are based on ethnicity, but it has nothing to do with the the E-2 visa.

You claimed the E-2 is based on ethnicity, it simply isn't.


Very few ethnic Koreans would want an E2. E2 isn't based on ethnicity, but why would an ethnic Korean want a lesser visa when one that IS based on ethnicity (and is much better) is easily attainable?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Junior wrote:
sojusucks wrote:
Remember, too, that Time Magazine is a widely-read magazine. There's no ignoring the situation, now.


I don't know...
They ignored the genocide in Rwanda and Darfur. Widespread honor killings and abuses of women in Palestine/Gaza. Political killings in Zimbabwe. Human rights abuses in eritrea, saudi arabia, north korea and yemen.

So I somehow doubt the world community is going to be up in arms at HIV tests in Korea.



Indeed. The egocentricity here is astounding. NO ONE CARES (other than yourself and your family). Heck even teachers here don't care. Times are tough all over. People will worry about themselves first and their friends second. Some unrelated teacher having to take HIV tests on the other side of the world is not even on the radar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
geldedgoat wrote:
E-2s are those who have not proven their Korean ethnicity.

E-2's are for foreign language instructors, nothing to do with ethnicity. If you happen to be an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, then you'll get an E-2. If you're not an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, you'll get an E-2. Again, ethnicity has nothing to do with getting an E-2.

geldedgoat wrote:
F-4s are those who have. F-2s are those who have proven they're 'Korean enough' by marrying an ethnic Korean. Clearly ethnicity has a lot to do with it.

I wasn't arguing about these class of visas, you are right some of the F-class visas are based on ethnicity, but it has nothing to do with the the E-2 visa.

You claimed the E-2 is based on ethnicity, it simply isn't.


Very few ethnic Koreans would want an E2. E2 isn't based on ethnicity, but why would an ethnic Korean want a lesser visa when one that IS based on ethnicity (and is much better) is easily attainable?


It's not that easily attainable, particularly for adoptees. Think the E-2 visa process is difficult? Double it and add in a language barrier on top with no recruiter there to take you step by step.

It was a minor miracle I got mine, thankfully my parents are very meticulous record keepers and I had a bunch of paperwork left over from an adoptee records check I did. Many ethnic Koreans facing that extra set of paperwork just go "well I'm only here for a year, I'll just do the E-2 and get this over with".

EDIT- It would also have been nice if the author had bothered to interview any ethnic Korean English Teachers to see if in fact they had ever been tested for HIV/AIDs before she wrote the statement "though ethnic Koreans are exempted, regardless of where they are born or raised. "

That was terrible journalism, worthy of the Korea Times, and once again typical of American reporting of issues in other countries.


Last edited by Steelrails on Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:03 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mosley



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gee, NSTs(esp. E2s) aren't treated as badly as Darfur refugees(an apples and ... er... automatic transmissions comparison if there ever was one)so said NSTs in South Korea should shut up & bend over?

How DO apologists sleep at night?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NYC_Gal 2.0



Joined: 10 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steelrails wrote:
NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
geldedgoat wrote:
E-2s are those who have not proven their Korean ethnicity.

E-2's are for foreign language instructors, nothing to do with ethnicity. If you happen to be an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, then you'll get an E-2. If you're not an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, you'll get an E-2. Again, ethnicity has nothing to do with getting an E-2.

geldedgoat wrote:
F-4s are those who have. F-2s are those who have proven they're 'Korean enough' by marrying an ethnic Korean. Clearly ethnicity has a lot to do with it.

I wasn't arguing about these class of visas, you are right some of the F-class visas are based on ethnicity, but it has nothing to do with the the E-2 visa.

You claimed the E-2 is based on ethnicity, it simply isn't.


Very few ethnic Koreans would want an E2. E2 isn't based on ethnicity, but why would an ethnic Korean want a lesser visa when one that IS based on ethnicity (and is much better) is easily attainable?


It's not that easily attainable, particularly for adoptees. Think the E-2 visa process is difficult? Double it and add in a language barrier on top with no recruiter there to take you step by step.

It was a minor miracle I got mine, thankfully my parents are very meticulous record keepers and I had a bunch of paperwork left over from an adoptee records check I did. Many ethnic Koreans facing that extra set of paperwork just go "well I'm only here for a year, I'll just do the E-2 and get this over with".


So, they'd have to do a records check. Is that so difficult? You still get a much better visa. Even if it's costly, most people would prefer that to the E2, if the option were viable.

As for keeping paperwork from an adoption, that's on par with keeping one's original birth certificate. I don't see this as extraordinary. We have my little brother's documents locked up with ours. <<shrugs>>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jvalmer



Joined: 06 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote:
Steelrails wrote:
NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
geldedgoat wrote:
E-2s are those who have not proven their Korean ethnicity.

E-2's are for foreign language instructors, nothing to do with ethnicity. If you happen to be an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, then you'll get an E-2. If you're not an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, you'll get an E-2. Again, ethnicity has nothing to do with getting an E-2.
geldedgoat wrote:
F-4s are those who have. F-2s are those who have proven they're 'Korean enough' by marrying an ethnic Korean. Clearly ethnicity has a lot to do with it.

I wasn't arguing about these class of visas, you are right some of the F-class visas are based on ethnicity, but it has nothing to do with the the E-2 visa.

You claimed the E-2 is based on ethnicity, it simply isn't.

Very few ethnic Koreans would want an E2. E2 isn't based on ethnicity, but why would an ethnic Korean want a lesser visa when one that IS based on ethnicity (and is much better) is easily attainable?

It's not that easily attainable, particularly for adoptees. Think the E-2 visa process is difficult? Double it and add in a language barrier on top with no recruiter there to take you step by step.

It was a minor miracle I got mine, thankfully my parents are very meticulous record keepers and I had a bunch of paperwork left over from an adoptee records check I did. Many ethnic Koreans facing that extra set of paperwork just go "well I'm only here for a year, I'll just do the E-2 and get this over with".

So, they'd have to do a records check. Is that so difficult? You still get a much better visa. Even if it's costly, most people would prefer that to the E2, if the option were viable.

As for keeping paperwork from an adoption, that's on par with keeping one's original birth certificate. I don't see this as extraordinary. We have my little brother's documents locked up with ours. <<shrugs>>

Don't forget the possibility of military service if a male is unsure of his status in Korea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
geldedgoat



Joined: 05 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote:
E2 isn't based on ethnicity [...]


Well, no, as explained on the previous page.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NYC_Gal 2.0



Joined: 10 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

geldedgoat wrote:
NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote:
E2 isn't based on ethnicity [...]


Well, no, as explained on the previous page.


My response was to jvalmer. With you, there was no issue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote:
Steelrails wrote:
NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
geldedgoat wrote:
E-2s are those who have not proven their Korean ethnicity.

E-2's are for foreign language instructors, nothing to do with ethnicity. If you happen to be an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, then you'll get an E-2. If you're not an ethnic Korean and meet the requirements to get an E-2, you'll get an E-2. Again, ethnicity has nothing to do with getting an E-2.

geldedgoat wrote:
F-4s are those who have. F-2s are those who have proven they're 'Korean enough' by marrying an ethnic Korean. Clearly ethnicity has a lot to do with it.

I wasn't arguing about these class of visas, you are right some of the F-class visas are based on ethnicity, but it has nothing to do with the the E-2 visa.

You claimed the E-2 is based on ethnicity, it simply isn't.


Very few ethnic Koreans would want an E2. E2 isn't based on ethnicity, but why would an ethnic Korean want a lesser visa when one that IS based on ethnicity (and is much better) is easily attainable?


It's not that easily attainable, particularly for adoptees. Think the E-2 visa process is difficult? Double it and add in a language barrier on top with no recruiter there to take you step by step.

It was a minor miracle I got mine, thankfully my parents are very meticulous record keepers and I had a bunch of paperwork left over from an adoptee records check I did. Many ethnic Koreans facing that extra set of paperwork just go "well I'm only here for a year, I'll just do the E-2 and get this over with".


So, they'd have to do a records check. Is that so difficult? You still get a much better visa. Even if it's costly, most people would prefer that to the E2, if the option were viable.

As for keeping paperwork from an adoption, that's on par with keeping one's original birth certificate. I don't see this as extraordinary. We have my little brother's documents locked up with ours. <<shrugs>>


Many Korean adoptees are missing their family registry papers. Given the spotty nature of records of the Korean baby export boom era and the desire of adoptive parents to create a new life for their child, these things tend to not be kept track of too closely. I showed up with the documents required for an F-4 and it still took an extra week because they had to contact my adoption agency and check with Korea whether or not my documents were genuine. I could have gotten that E-2 right then and there and been on the plane a week earlier.

Anecdotally, of the ethnic-Korean teachers I have met here, half of been on F-4s, half have been on E-2s. And since all of them have either taught at public schools or been part of the TaLK program, they all had to do drug tests and HIV tests, not that I agree with how things are done, just that plenty of Koreans are here on E-2s.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sojusucks



Joined: 31 May 2008

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mosley wrote:
Gee, NSTs(esp. E2s) aren't treated as badly as Darfur refugees(an apples and ... er... automatic transmissions comparison if there ever was one)so said NSTs in South Korea should shut up & bend over?

How DO apologists sleep at night?



Alone, evidently. Laughing

If you don't think people around the world read Time Magazine then what do you think they read?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
geldedgoat



Joined: 05 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steelrails wrote:
[...] plenty of Koreans are here on E-2s.


Only if they haven't (whether it be a matter of willingness or not) proven so. There's absolutely no doubt that if Kimmi had a magic wand that auto-detected ethnicity, there would be absolutely zero Koreans with an E-2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
northway



Joined: 05 Jul 2010

PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mosley wrote:
Gee, NSTs(esp. E2s) aren't treated as badly as Darfur refugees(an apples and ... er... automatic transmissions comparison if there ever was one)so said NSTs in South Korea should shut up & bend over?

How DO apologists sleep at night?


Oh please. All Junior said was that expecting Korea to suddenly perk up and change things due to a Time Magazine article is wishful thinking at best.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International