|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bloopity Bloop

Joined: 26 Apr 2009 Location: Seoul yo
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Leon wrote: |
| Meeting people here is really easy, you just have to be approachable. That means not looking at the ground when you are walking around and not always listening to your ipod when your out and about. I have meet tons of people and I don't ever specifically try to make friends. I think that might be key is to not act desperate to meet people just let it happen, but to go places where people feel comfortable approaching you. Oh, smiling and making eye contact, but not staring, always helps. |
Appreciate the input, but this would only work for you whiteys. For an Asian American like me, who completely blends in, to the point that Koreans don't even believe that I'm not Korean when I tell them, I don't think any amount of smiling/eye contact would ever compel a Korean to speak to another "Korean"--and I really doubt foreigners would, either, unless I was a girl.
It's really shocking the reactions I get when I tell people I'm not Korean. They often proceed to ask me repeatedly, "Where are you from? You are not Korean? You're from America? You were born there? Not Korean? You have a Korean face. You're not Korean? Are your parents from Korea?" This happens WHENEVER I meet Koreans.
And if I approach someone with English for directions or any random bs, they freak out. It's almost as if some huge, Arnold-esque guy came up to them and started speaking with a little girl's voice.
And I'm not exactly sure how one would go about looking desperate to meet people. Like, would you be holding a sign that says, "Be friends with me. Please?" hahaha. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xuanzang

Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Location: Sadang
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bloopity Bloop wrote: |
| Leon wrote: |
| Meeting people here is really easy, you just have to be approachable. That means not looking at the ground when you are walking around and not always listening to your ipod when your out and about. I have meet tons of people and I don't ever specifically try to make friends. I think that might be key is to not act desperate to meet people just let it happen, but to go places where people feel comfortable approaching you. Oh, smiling and making eye contact, but not staring, always helps. |
Appreciate the input, but this would only work for you whiteys. For an Asian American like me, who completely blends in, to the point that Koreans don't even believe that I'm not Korean when I tell them, I don't think any amount of smiling/eye contact would ever compel a Korean to speak to another "Korean"--and I really doubt foreigners would, either, unless I was a girl.
It's really shocking the reactions I get when I tell people I'm not Korean. They often proceed to ask me repeatedly, "Where are you from? You are not Korean? You're from America? You were born there? Not Korean? You have a Korean face. You're not Korean? Are your parents from Korea?" This happens WHENEVER I meet Koreans.
And if I approach someone with English for directions or any random bs, they freak out. It's almost as if some huge, Arnold-esque guy came up to them and started speaking with a little girl's voice.
And I'm not exactly sure how one would go about looking desperate to meet people. Like, would you be holding a sign that says, "Be friends with me. Please?" hahaha. |
Well you're going to have a hard time with a downer attitude like that. You said in your tv thread that Seoul is going to be your home for a while. Therefore, you're going to have to learn to take risks and the lumps that come with it. Approach people if they look lost or in need. Not every white foreigner will see you as a Korean wanting English lessons. Not every headphone wearing foreigner is using it as a warning buoy. That guy was just a douche and probably not friend material either.
There will be times that people act dumb - foreign or Korean. So be it. Just move on and you're going to meet people. If you're working for SMOE then workshops are your best bet. Or district meetings. Hopefully there or anywhere you can meet friends to play games with, go to dinners with, etc. Fortune favours the bold Bloop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
machoman

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
as an asian american, i can attest to what bloop said too. i don't blend in AS much since i've got a shaved head and because i'm mixed with viet, i have a more southeast look. people tend to stare or look at me, and i get a mixture of koreans being confused as to whether or not i'm korean. some even think i'm a white guy. and one korean was so shocked that i spoke english that well.
but yeah, koreans see themselves as the #1 asian and all other asians are beneath them. as far as dating life, a korean girl isn't going to approach the asian-american guy, actually, the asian american is probably the bottom of the totem pole.
as far as making new friends, i don't think
| Quote: |
| Approach people if they look lost or in need. |
that will work. i've had random people ask me for directions but that's not a way to become friends.
but anyway, the asian foreigner has a different experience than the white or black foreigner counterpart. sometimes it works for, and sometimes it works against you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bloopity Bloop

Joined: 26 Apr 2009 Location: Seoul yo
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xuanzang wrote: |
Well you're going to have a hard time with a downer attitude like that. You said in your tv thread that Seoul is going to be your home for a while. Therefore, you're going to have to learn to take risks and the lumps that come with it. Approach people if they look lost or in need. Not every white foreigner will see you as a Korean wanting English lessons. Not every headphone wearing foreigner is using it as a warning buoy. That guy was just a douche and probably not friend material either.
There will be times that people act dumb - foreign or Korean. So be it. Just move on and you're going to meet people. If you're working for SMOE then workshops are your best bet. Or district meetings. Hopefully there or anywhere you can meet friends to play games with, go to dinners with, etc. Fortune favours the bold Bloop. |
I was referring to Leon's point about GETTING APPROACHED. THAT would never happen until Koreans start talking to random Koreans--although with my lacking Korean language skills, that might not help me, either.
There IS value in approaching people, and I should definitely do that more 'cause I have a pretty easy time talking to people; but to be clear, I was referring specifically to Leon's point about getting approached. The day that a Korean/foreigner approaches me (besides the random elderly citizen looking for directions yelling, "STUDENT!" at me), I will buy everyone who posted in this thread a 참치김밥. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bloopity Bloop

Joined: 26 Apr 2009 Location: Seoul yo
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| machoman wrote: |
but anyway, the asian foreigner has a different experience than the white or black foreigner counterpart. sometimes it works for, and sometimes it works against you. |
A pretty interesting point lost on most non-Asian foreigners, and probably even most Asian foreigners is that NO MATTER HOW PERFECTLY you are speaking English, Koreans will mostly assume you're just a Korean that's put a sh-ton of hours into a hagwon.
They have no idea what "perfect English" sounds like, so it makes sense to them that the Asian face talking Englishee isn't a native of the US, UK, Aussieland, etc.. It took me a while to realize this.
Haha, another pretty funny memory (in retrospect) was when I was at a restaurant with all non-Asian foreigners (aka ebony and ivory--me being the sole lemondrop). Of course, the person coming in to take our orders made a bee line for me. He ended up being the owner of this particular joint. When I started speaking to him in English he got PISSED OFF and said, "You are Korean so speak Korean to me! Just because you have foreign friends doesn't mean anything. Stop showing off!"
One of my foreign friends, whose Korean is pretty damn good, relayed to the man that indeed, I am no Korean and we ended up getting a service round of sodas/beer.
So sometimes I wonder, if I'm out with friends and I'm only speaking English, could others be thinking in the same frame?
I visited a friend's school yesterday to observe his classes. I thought my experience would be a little different there because THEY also have a foreign teacher and are exposed to NSETs at school, workshops, etc.--some of which were likely gyopos. Well, even though my friend introduced me as the NSET of XXXX High School, I was then asked by about 8 different people how I know my friend, where I studied English, why I wasn't speaking Korean, etc. The VP, despite having just been told repeatedly I was a foreigner, spoke to me completely in Korean while speaking completely in decent English to my friend. Respectfully, I tried my best to go along with it--probably missed a few beats--but it didn't seem to bother him and he presented me with one of those ginger drinks.
So yes, a VERY different experience. Not saying it's better or worse than other foreigner experiences here--just something most foreign NSETs in Korea (non-Asian) probably don't (need and/or care to) think about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tanklor1
Joined: 13 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have a Chinese-Candaian friend whose working here, I mentioned when she first came here she should wear a little tag saying: "I'm Deaf." in Korean. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
machoman

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bloopity Bloop wrote: |
| machoman wrote: |
but anyway, the asian foreigner has a different experience than the white or black foreigner counterpart. sometimes it works for, and sometimes it works against you. |
A pretty interesting point lost on most non-Asian foreigners, and probably even most Asian foreigners is that NO MATTER HOW PERFECTLY you are speaking English, Koreans will mostly assume you're just a Korean that's put a sh-ton of hours into a hagwon.
They have no idea what "perfect English" sounds like, so it makes sense to them that the Asian face talking Englishee isn't a native of the US, UK, Aussieland, etc.. It took me a while to realize this.
Haha, another pretty funny memory (in retrospect) was when I was at a restaurant with all non-Asian foreigners (aka ebony and ivory--me being the sole lemondrop). Of course, the person coming in to take our orders made a bee line for me. He ended up being the owner of this particular joint. When I started speaking to him in English he got PISSED OFF and said, "You are Korean so speak Korean to me! Just because you have foreign friends doesn't mean anything. Stop showing off!"
One of my foreign friends, whose Korean is pretty damn good, relayed to the man that indeed, I am no Korean and we ended up getting a service round of sodas/beer.
So sometimes I wonder, if I'm out with friends and I'm only speaking English, could others be thinking in the same frame?
I visited a friend's school yesterday to observe his classes. I thought my experience would be a little different there because THEY also have a foreign teacher and are exposed to NSETs at school, workshops, etc.--some of which were likely gyopos. Well, even though my friend introduced me as the NSET of XXXX High School, I was then asked by about 8 different people how I know my friend, where I studied English, why I wasn't speaking Korean, etc. The VP, despite having just been told repeatedly I was a foreigner, spoke to me completely in Korean while speaking completely in decent English to my friend. Respectfully, I tried my best to go along with it--probably missed a few beats--but it didn't seem to bother him and he presented me with one of those ginger drinks.
So yes, a VERY different experience. Not saying it's better or worse than other foreigner experiences here--just something most foreign NSETs in Korea (non-Asian) probably don't (need and/or care to) think about. |
i remember last year i went to a local middle school to support my student in a golden bell competition. i came a little late, and as i walked in, one of the teachers running the competition handed me a whiteboard and marker and started speaking to me in korean thinking i was a student. i'm a 28 year old man!
do you still get treated like a korean when you're on konkuk though? there are tons and tons of chinese students roaming and working around there. so i'd figure they'd be more lenient on you not speaking korean.
anyway, i usually end up having more asian foreign friends than i do white friends. in the states, it's the opposite. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomato

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bloopity Bloop wrote: |
| A pretty interesting point lost on most non-Asian foreigners . . . is that . . . Koreans will mostly assume you're just a Korean . . . |
I'm an American honky, but I can add to your list of anecdotes.
I was at an October festival with a two other people.
One was a Chinese-American who never opened a Korean book in her life.
The other was a gyopo who knew so little Korean that she had to speak to the vendors in English.
So I was the one who had to do most of the interpreting.
Nevertheless, I was the one who had to fight off all the Koreans who were grabbing me and saying "캔 아이 헬프 유." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jacksthirty
Joined: 30 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Bloop
Do you play PC games? If so, go to Steam and download Left 4 Dead 2, and I'll meet you on the on-line campaigns.
Nice thread you started by the way. Interesting for a lonely guy such as myself. It's inspired me to crawl outta my shell and find some like minded buddies... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheresaTheresa
Joined: 24 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Globutron wrote: |
Yes with facebook groups. I was iffy about it for the first... 5 months, but then I did it once and never turned back. I just joined a single hiking group and I've been 6 or 7 times and every time there has been at least 2 people I end up sticking with who have so much in common with me. And I'm more than often considered bizarre.
I'm one of those people who are not comfortable in their own skin, but I'm open to clubbing on occasion and bar nights out. Just not all the time. I'm far more interested in sitting at home reading books about the plausability of humans existing in space as pure consciousness, or reading a concise history of Javanese Gamelan music. Or indeed playing Tekken (which I haven't touched since I got here... no console, but I was pretty badass with Lee).
I figure most teachers here are approachable even for a shy nerd like me, despite my early assumptions that you were all personality lacking dumbo's with no ambitions other than to sleep with asians. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Draz

Joined: 27 Jun 2007 Location: Land of Morning Clam
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| machoman wrote: |
| Fox wrote: |
Yes, and one of the marks of a rapist is that he actively seeks out women. Does that mean every man that goes to a place where women are is a rapist? Of course not. Apply the logic. |
i would have to say that for a man, seeking out women and seeking out children is very very different. for a man, there's a biological and social imperative to find a mate. there are chemicals at work for men to be attracted to women, it's what drives a man, in many cases. |
Um, no, it's different because women are full grown people capable of having fulfilling friendships with other adults while children are mentally and socially under-developed and can't actually be your friends so any interest in them stated in a thread about "having friends" is suspect.
lol j/k. I crack me up sometimes. The only difference between women and children is that women can legally consent to sex, so you're not a rapist if you "go to a place where women are".
Jeez louise.
Also. Tomato. Why would you post something so bizarre? Are you kissing these random children at the library on the lips? That's not cool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Globutron
Joined: 13 Feb 2010 Location: England/Anyang
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The lips are not the only place I kiss kids here.
Hooves, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomato

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
The paternal drive is evident in animals.
Among most monogamous mammals (Kleiman 1977), notably the Japanese macaque (Itani 1959), the hamadryas baboon (Spencer-Booth 1970), the spectacled langur (Horwich 1974), and most dog and cat species (Spencer-Booth 1970), male adultS have been found carrying infants.
In fact, Mitchell (1969) has found that paternal and maternal behavior in primates develop before puberty.
Adult male primates (Spencer-Booth 1970; Bales 1980), rodents (Spencer-Booth 1970; Elwood 1975; Hartung & Dewsbury, 1979; Makin & Porter 1984; Tasse 1986), dogs (Spencer-Booth 1970), bears (Spencer-Booth 1970), and cats (Spencer-Booth 1970) have been found treating juveniles with affection.
A mother cebid monkey accepts an infant only if a male carries it (Taub 1990). Could this effect also be present to one degree or another in humans too?
These findings are not limited to the adult male's own offspring. Although adult males in the Primate Class prefer infants related to themselves (Koford 1963a, 1963b), they also deal with other infants (Mendoza 1985; Taub 1990). There have been such findings among dogs (Morris 1986b: 13), mice (Smith & Simmel 1977), robins (Harper 1985), eastern bluebirds (Pinkowski 1978; Gowaty & Karlin 1984), and anemonefish (Yanagisawa & Ochi 1986).
The paternal drive is different from the maternal drive.
There are several such differences. Let us consider them one by one:
■ Paternal love is more tolerant toward gross motor activity on the part of the child than is maternal love.
Compared with women teachers, male teachers tend to ask for more free play (Robinson & Hobson 1978; Robinson 1979; Robinson & Canaday 1976). They also initiate athletic and practical activities, such as woodworking and bicycle repair (Murgatroyd 1955; Johnston 1970; Biedenkapp & Goering 1971; Kendall 1972; Lee & Wolinsky 1973; Seifert 1973; Robinson 1979, 1981; Robinson & Hobson 1978; Robinson & Canaday 1976) and even practical activities which are traditionally feminine (Johnston 1970; Williams 1970).
Compared with women teachers, male teachers also have a higher tolerance for noise (Johnston 1970; Robinson & Canaday 1976). What a woman teacher might call "noise and confusion" a man teacher might call "the hum of activity."
■ Paternal love involves more gross motor activity on the part of the adult than maternal love.
Fathers of infants (Lamb 1977a; Kotelchuck 1976; Weinraub & Frankel 1977; Clarke-Stewart 1980; Pedersen 1980a) and fathers of preschoolers (Osofsky & O'Connell 1972) have been found to be more playful than mothers. Male child care workers and teachers are more prone to roughhouse with children than are women child care workers and teachers (Kendall 1972; Seifert 1973; Milgram & Sciarra 1974; Greenberg 1977).
Among child psychologists, there seems to be only one opponent of adults playing with juveniles: turn-of-the-century baby guru L. E. Holt (1907: 167) argued, "Babies under six months old should never be played with; and the less of it at any time the better for the infant." When he was asked what harm was done, he answered, "They are made nervous and irritable, sleep badly, and suffer from indigestion and in many other respects."
L. E. Holt would have to preach his message throughout the Mammal Class. Adult males play with juveniles in most if not all primate species (Bales 1980), specifically Japanese macaques (Itani 1959) and rhesus monkeys (Redican & Mitchell 1973a, 1973b). Adult male spectacled langurs (Horwich 1974) and silverback gorillas (Fossey 1983) allow juveniles to play and tumble on them.
Women teachers saying, "We don't have as much fun with kids because we've been at it longer! Try taking the responsibilities for as long as we have and then act as rambunctious as you do now!" But Field (1978) found that even male primary caregivers of infants are more physically playful than mothers.
Although adult male animals are usually more frolicsome with juveniles than adult females, adults of neither gender have the corner on the market. Species with notably sportive adult females include sheep (Millar 1974: 76), goats (Millar 1974: 76), lions (Millar 1974: 76), and cats (Morris 1986a: 4 .
Morris (1977: 257-258) argues that playing with children sets a foundation for a good sense of humor. He analyzes humor as "an expression of a danger encountered but escaped."
In a study by Tasch (1952), 62% of the fathers emphasized children's function as companions. They reported thankfully that "you don't come home and look at four walls."
■ Paternal love is more co-equal than maternal love.
Compared with female teachers, male teachers are less apt to talk down to children (Triplett 1968; Kendall 1972), more likely to allow freedom of speech for children (Robinson & Canaday 1976), and more likely to respond to ongoing activities as opposed to initiating activities themselves (Lee & Wolinsky 1973).
In an study conducted in an elementary school (Lee & Wolinsky 1973), children of both genders were asked the question "Does ______ like you?" Children of both genders were more prone to answer yes in regard to male teachers than in regard to female teachers.
This is not to say that men relate better with children than women. On the contrary, the same study indicated that women might be more nurturant toward children than are men. The same children answered the opposite way when they were asked, "Does ______ care about you?"
■ Paternal love is less verbal than maternal love.
Women talk to infants more than do men (Pedersen 1980a). In a sample of parents (Osofsky & O'Connell 1972), mothers of children were more inclined to give verbal instruction for tasks while fathers were more inclined to physically help.
■ Paternal love is more discriminatory on the basis of gender than maternal love.
It has been found that fathers discriminate on the basis of gender more than do mothers (Tauber 1979). Fathers are more anxious over girl babies' well-being than over that of boy babies (Pedersen & Robson 1969), interact more positively and socially with preschool daughters than with sons (Tauber 1979), interact more with elementary age sons than with daughters (Kotelchuck 1976; Parke & O'Leary 1976; Rendina & Dickerscheid 1976; Lamb 1977a, 1977b), but are more affectionate (Fagot 1978) and more permissive (Rothbart & Maccoby 1966) toward girls than toward boys. Fathers are also more negative toward girls' tomboyish behavior (Tauber 1979) and boys' feminine behavior (Fagot 1978) than are mothers.
It is not just in our species that adult males are more sex-discriminatory in dealing with juveniles. Rather, it is true throughout the Primate Order (Redican 1976).
This is not to say that only men discriminate. Women preschool teachers are more affectionate toward girls than toward boys (Botkin & Twardosz 1988), public school teachers are more harsh in correcting misbehavior on the part of boys (Serbin et al. 1973), and mothers are more permissive toward boys than toward girls (Rothbart & Maccoby 1966).
Parents of both genders are guilty of discrimination. Parents talk to girl babies more than to boy babies (Lamb 1977a). Both parents support active play in boys more than in girls (Tauber 1979). Contrary to findings quoted above, Moss (1967) and Lewis (1972) find that girls receive more attention from both parents than do boys. Girls also receive more affection from both parents than do boys (Lewis 1972).
Our simian cousins are just as guilty. Among the ape species, adults of both genders are more protective toward female infants than toward male infants (Itani 1963; Kummer 1967).
The paternal role is important.
If a father is not present, he is missed. Father absence has an unfavorable effect on school achievement in both boys (Blanchard & Biller 1971) and girls (Landy, Rosenberg, & Sutton-Smith 1969). Sibling abuse is more common among father-absent children (Green, A. H. 1984). Father-absent individuals are overrepresented among heroin addicts (Sullivan & Fleshman 1975).
Father-absent girls are more anxious than father-present girls and feel less control over their lives (Hetherington 1972). 18-month-olds are more upset when left by cross-sex parents than when left by same-sex parents (Weinraub & Frankel 1977). Daughters of divorcees tend to seek approval from men while daughters of widows tend to avoid men (Hetherington 1972).
Screen star Marilyn Monroe was deserted by her father and spent most of her childhood in an orphanage and foster homes. According to Moes (1990), this explains her "seemingly endless quest for validation from men."
Father-absent boys are less assertive and aggressive, more dependent, and less masculine in their game preferences (Stoller 1968; Green, R. 1974; Hetherington & Deur 1971). Father-absent boys have six times the criminal rate of father-present boys (Brody 1978). Father-absent boys in fourth grade have a greater preference for male teachers than do father-present boys (Cortes & Fleming 1968).
Father absence could be enough to drive a person crazy. Father-deprived children are more likely to suffer mental disorders in later life (Tennant, Bebbington, & Hurry 1982). In a large-sample study, 27.6% of psychotic patients had lost one parent by the age of 12, as opposed to 20% of controls (Barry & Bousfield 1937). Throughout history, insane kings were twice as likely to have lost their fathers early in life than sane kings (Barry 1936).
The adult's personality variables could affect children in divers ways. Nurturant fathers have children with higher IQ scores (Radin 1973). Active fathers have more achievement-oriented girls (Tauber 1979). Masculine fathers have more feminine girls (Mussen & Rutherford 1963). Supportive fathers have more sedentary girls, whereas supportive mothers have more active girls (Tauber 1979).
Boys are more likely to identify with fathers who are rewarding, gratifying, understanding, and warm. Such father-identified boys are more calm and friendly (Payne & Mussen 1956). Nurturant and affectionate fathers have more masculine boys (Mussen & Rutherford 1963). Sociable fathers have more creative and friendly boys (Tauber 1979).
How do children react to male teachers? Some writers have postulated that girls need male teachers in order to establish favorable heterosexual attitudes (Topp 1954) and that boys need male teachers in order to establish male identity (Topp 1954; Tolbert 1968; Vairo 1969; Johnston 1970). Burtt (1965) observes that preschool boys with male teachers seem to be easier to handle at home.
Although third and fourth grade girls imitate female teachers more than do boys (Portuges & Feshbach 1972), nursery school boys imitate male teachers more than do girls (Madsen 1968). This confirms the common notion that children follow same-sex role models.
A male teacher could be welcomed by boys as respite from the female chauvinism which allegedly prevails in the schools. Lee & Wolinsky (1973) found that both boys and girls agree that women teachers prefer girls, but that they also agree that men teachers have no preference.
In Germany, where the majority of elementary teachers are men, boys outperform girls in reading achievement (Preston 1962). In the United States, boys' reading achievement was poorer than that of girls under female teachers, but boys equaled girls' achievement with auto-instructional methods (McNeil 1964).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bales, K. B. 1980. Cumulative scaling of paternalistic behavior in primates. American Naturalist 116: 454-461.
Barry, H. 1936. Orphanhood as a factor in psychoses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 30: 431-438.
_____ & Bousfield, W. A. 1937. Incidence of orphanhood among fifteen hundred psychotic patients. Journal of Genetic Psychology 50: 198-201.
Biedenkapp, M. S. & Goering, J. D. 1971. How `masculine' are male elementary teachers? Phi Delta Kappan 53: 115-117.
Blanchard, R. W. & Biller, H. B. 1971. Father availability and academic performance among third-grade boys. Developmental Psychology 4: 301-305.
Botkin, D. & Twardosz, S. 1988. Early childhood teachers' affectionate behavior: Differential expression to female children, male children, and groups of children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 3, 2 (June): 167-177.
Brody, S. 1978. Daddy's gone to Colorado: Male-staffed child care for father-absent boys. Counseling Psychologist 7, 4: 33-36.
Burtt, M. 1965. The effect of a man teacher. Young Children 23: 93-97.
Clarke-Stewart, K. A. 1980. The father's contribution to children's cognitive and social development in early childhood. In Pedersen, F. A., ed. 1980. The father-infant relationship: Observational studies in the family setting. New York: Praeger: 111-146.
Cortes, C. F. & Fleming, E. S. 1968. The effects of father absence on the adjustment of culturally disadvantaged boys. Journal of Special Education 2: 413-420.
Elwood, R. W. 1975. Paternal and maternal behaviour in the Mongolian gerbil. Animal Behavior 23: 766-772.
Fagot, B. 1978. The influence of sex of child on parental reactions to toddler children. Child Development 49: 459-465.
Field, T. 1978. Interaction patterns of primary versus secondary caretaker fathers. Developmental Psychology 14: 183-185.
Fossey, D. 1983. Gorillas in the mist. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gowaty, P. A. & Karlin, A. A. 1984. Multiple maternity and paternity in single broods of apparently monagamous eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Behavioral Biology and Sociobiology 15: 91-95.
Green, A. H. 1984. Child abuse by siblings. Child Abuse and Neglect 8: 311-317.
Green, R. 1974. Sexual identity conflict in children and adults. New York: Basic Books.
Greenberg, M. 1977. The male early childhood teacher: An appraisal. Young Children 32: 34-38.
Harper, D. G. C. 1985. Interactions between adult robins and chicks belonging to other pairs. Animal Behavior 33: 876-884.
Hartung, T. G. & Dewsbury, D. A. 1979. Paternal behavior in sex species of muroid rodents. Behavioral Neural Biology 26: 466-478.
Hetherington, E. M. 1972. Effects of father absence on personality development in adolescent daughters. Developmental Psychology 7: 313-326.
_____ & Deur, J. L. 1971. The effects of father absence on child development. Young Children 26: 233-248.
Holt, L. E. 1907. The care and feeding of children: A catechism for the use of mothers and children's nurses. New York: Appleton.
Horwich, R. H. 1974. Development of behaviors in a male spectacled langur (Presbytis obscurus). Primates 15: 151-178.
Itani, J. 1959. Paternal care in the wild Japanese monkey, Macaca fuscata fuscata. Primates 2: 61-93.
Johnston, J. M. 1970. "Of hairy arms and a deep baritone voice". Childhood Education 47, 3 (December): 144-147.
Kendall, E. 1972. We have men on the staff. Young Children 27: 358-362.
Kleiman, D. G. 1977. Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 39-69.
Koford, C. B. 1963a. Group relations on an island colony of rhesus monkeys. In Southwick, C. H., ed. 1963. Primate social behavior. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. Quoted in Mitchell, G. D. 1969. Paternalistic behavior in primates. Psychological Bulletin 71: 399-415.
_____. 1963b. Rank of mothers and sons in bands of rhesus monkeys. Science 141: 356-357.
Kotelchuck, M. 1976. The infant's relationship to the father: Experimental evidence. In Lamb, M. E. 1976. The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley: 329-344.
Kummer, H. 1967. Tripartite relations in Hamadryas baboons. In Altmann, S., ed. Social communications among primates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamb, M. E. 1977a. The development of mother-infant and father-infant attachments in the second year of life. Developmental Psychology 13: 637-648.
_____. 1977b. The development of parental preferences in the first two years of life. Sex Roles 3: 495-497.
Lee, P. C. & Wolinsky, A. L. 1973. Male teachers of young children: A preliminary empirical study. Young Children 28: 344-352.
Lewis, M. 1972. State as an infant-environment interaction: An analysis of mother infant interaction as a function of sex. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 18: 95-121.
Landy, F.; Rosenberg, B. G.; & Sutton-Smith, B. 1969. The effect of limited father absence on cognitive development. Child Development 40: 941-944.
Madsen, C. 1968. Nurturance and modeling in preschoolers. Child Development 39: 221-236.
Makin, J. W. & Porter, R. H. 1984. Paternal behavior in the spiny mouse. Behavioral Neural Biology 41: 135-151.
McNeil, J. D. 1964. Programmed instruction versus usual classroom procedures--teaching boys to read. American Educational Research Journal 1: 113-119.
Mendoza, D. L. 1985. Paternal care in primates: Comparative perspectives. In Brain, P. F. & Ramirez, J. M., eds. 1986. Cross-disciplinary studies on aggression. Seville: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla: 198-214.
Milgram, J. I. & Sciarra, D. J. 1974. Male preschool teacher: The realities of acceptance. Educational Forum 38: 245-247
Millar, S. 1974. The psychology of play. New York: Jason Aronson.
Mitchell, G. D. 1969. Paternalistic behavior in primates. Psychological Bulletin 71: 399-415.
Morris, D. 1977. Manwatching: A field guide to human behavior. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
_____. 1986a. Catwatching. New York: Crown Publishers.
_____. 1986b. Dogwatching. New York: Crown Publishers.
Murgatroyd, R. 1955. A man among 6 year olds. Childhood Education 32, 3 (November): 132-135.
Mussen, P. & Rutherford, E. 1963. Parent-child relations and parental personality in relation to young children's sex-role preferences. Child Development 34: 589-607.
Moes, E. C. 1990. Validation in the eyes of men: A psychoanalytic interpretation of paternal deprivation and the daughter's desire. Melanie Klein and Object Relations 8: 43-65.
Moss, H. A. 1967. Sex, age, and state as determinants of mother-infant interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 13: 19-36.
Osofsky, J. D. & O'Connell, E. J. 1972. Daughters' effects upon mothers' and fathers' behaviors. Developmental Psychology 7: 157-168.
Parke, R. O. & O'Leary, S. E. 1976. Father-mother-infant interaction in the newborn period: Some findings, some observations, and some unresolved issues. In Riegel, K. & Meacham, J., eds. The developing individual in a changing world. The Hauge: Mouton, v. 2: 653-663.
Payne, D. E. & Mussen, P. H. 1956. Parent-child relations and father identification among adolescent boys. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 52: 358-362.
Pedersen, F. A. 1980a. Overview of findings: parental similarities and differences. In Pedersen 1980b: 149-153.
_____. 1980b. The father-infant relationship: Observational studies in the family setting. New York: Praeger.
_____ & Robson, K. S. 1969. Father participation in infancy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 39: 466-472.
Pinkowski, B. C. 1978. Two successive male eastern bluebirds tending the same nest. Auk 95: 606-608.
Preston, R. C. 1962. Reading achievement of German and American children. School and Society 90: 350-354.
Radin, N. 1973. Observed paternal behaviors as antecedents of intellectual functioning in young boys. Developmental Psychology 8: 369-376.
Redican, W. K. 1976. Adult male-infant interactions in nonhuman primates. In Lamb, ed. 1976: 345-385.
_____ & Mitchell, G. 1973a. Play between adult male and infant rhesus monkeys. American Zoologist 14: 295-302.
Rendina, I. & Dickersheid, J. D. 1976. Father involvement with first-born infants. Family Coordinator 25: 373-379.
Robinson, B. E. 1979. Men caring for the young: An androgynous perspective. Family Coordinator 28: 553-560.
_____ & Canaday, H. 1976. Male caregivers: Humanists, heroes and handymen. Dimensions 5: 113-116.
_____ & Hobson, C. M. 1978. Men in day care: You've come a long way, buddy! Child Care Quarterly 7, 2 (Summer): 156-163.
Rothbart, M. K. & Maccoby, E. E. 1966. Parents' differential reactions to sons and daughters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 237-243.
Seifert, K. L. 1973. Some problems of men in child care center work. Child Welfare 52, 3 (March): 167-171.
Serbin, L.; Leary, K.; Kent, R.; & Toncik, I. 1973. A comparison of teacher response to the preacademic and problem behavior of boys and girls. Child Development 44: 769-804.
Smith, M. L. & Simmel, E. C. 1977. Paternal effects on the development of social behavior in Mus musculus. Developmental Psychobiology 10: 151-159.
Spencer-Booth, V. 1970. The relationships between mammalian young and conspecifics other than mothers and peers: A review. Advances in the Study of Behavior 3: 119-194.
Stoller, R. J. 1968. Sex and gender. New York: Jason Aronson.
Sullivan, N. D. & Fleshman, R. P. 1975. Paternal deprivation in male heroin addicts. Drug Forum 5: 75-79.
Tasch, R. J. 1952. The role of the father in the family. Journal of Experimental Education 20: 319-359.
Taub, D. M. 1990. The functions of primate paternalism: A cross-species review. In Feierman,J. R., ed. 1990: {b]Pedophilia: Biosocial dimensions[/b]. New York: Springer-Verlang: 338-377.
Tasse, J. 1986. Maternal and paternal care in the rock cavy, Kerodon rupestris, a South American hystricomorph rodent. Zoological Biology 5: 27-43.
Tauber, M. A. 1979. Sex differences in parent-child interaction styles during a free-play session. Child Development 50: 981-988.
Tennant, C.; Bebbington, P.; & Hurry, J. 1982. Social experiences in childhood and adult psychiatric morbidity: A multiple regression analysis. Psychological Medicine 12: 321-327.
Tolbert, R. N. 1968. Should you employ that male elementary teacher? National Elementary Principal 47, 4 (February): 40-43.
Topp, R. F. 1954. Solving the man problem in elementary education. Nations Schools 54, 4 (November): 49-51.
Triplett, L. 1968. Elementary education: a mans world? Instructor 78, 3 (November): 50-52.
Vairo, P. D. 1969. Wanted: 20, 000 male first-grade teachers. Education 89: 222-224.
Weinraub, M. & Frankel, J. 1977. Sex differences in parent-infant interaction during free play, departure, and separation. Child Development 48: 1240-1249.
Williams, B. M. 1970. Of hairy arms and a deep baritone voice. Childhood Education 47, 3 (December): 139-143.
Yanagisawa, Y. & Ochi, H. 1986. Step-fathering in the anemonefish Amphiprion clarkii: A removal study. Animal Behavior 345: 1769-1780. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leon
Joined: 31 May 2010
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bloopity Bloop wrote: |
| Leon wrote: |
| Meeting people here is really easy, you just have to be approachable. That means not looking at the ground when you are walking around and not always listening to your ipod when your out and about. I have meet tons of people and I don't ever specifically try to make friends. I think that might be key is to not act desperate to meet people just let it happen, but to go places where people feel comfortable approaching you. Oh, smiling and making eye contact, but not staring, always helps. |
Appreciate the input, but this would only work for you whiteys. For an Asian American like me, who completely blends in, to the point that Koreans don't even believe that I'm not Korean when I tell them, I don't think any amount of smiling/eye contact would ever compel a Korean to speak to another "Korean"--and I really doubt foreigners would, either, unless I was a girl.
It's really shocking the reactions I get when I tell people I'm not Korean. They often proceed to ask me repeatedly, "Where are you from? You are not Korean? You're from America? You were born there? Not Korean? You have a Korean face. You're not Korean? Are your parents from Korea?" This happens WHENEVER I meet Koreans.
And if I approach someone with English for directions or any random bs, they freak out. It's almost as if some huge, Arnold-esque guy came up to them and started speaking with a little girl's voice.
And I'm not exactly sure how one would go about looking desperate to meet people. Like, would you be holding a sign that says, "Be friends with me. Please?" hahaha. |
Yeah, I forgot from the first page that you were Asian. Its possible that you would be approached in Itaewon as most people there speak English regardless of race. As to the desperate thing, its subtle but its not to hard to tell when you meet someone who is desperate to make friends. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redaxe
Joined: 01 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Did tomato really just write an entire essay with a bibliography? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|