| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| What if, as "Curb your Enthusiasm" suggests, it's not the small *beep* but the "huge vagina"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SweetBear

Joined: 18 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| khyber wrote: |
| What if, as "Curb your Enthusiasm" suggests, it's not the small *beep* but the "huge vagina"? |
Shouldn't be a problem with all you so called " big fellas" out there.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kermo

Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Location: Eating eggs, with a comb, out of a shoe.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kermo wrote: |
| neandergirl wrote: |
| billybrobby wrote: |
hahaha!! 6 inches?? dude, you couldn't even get it out of your fly to take whizz with! tiny!
don't listen to this Dr. Nick. the Simpsons had a Dr. Nick too. it's just some feel-good crap for dudes with small ones. if you look at the real medical journals, they'll tell you that the average size is 9.5 worldwide. In America, where people are taller than other countries, it's between 10.5 and 11. |
While I personally have no reason not to believe the numbers above, what 'real medical journals' are you citing? A study, based on Kinsey data and published in the Journal for Sex Research (24:177-183), gives the following:
Flaccid *beep* Length: 3.89 inches (mean), (standard deviation 0.73)
Erect *beep* Length: 6.21 inches (mean), (standard deviation 0.77) |
Mod Edit:Removed picture |
Ok, just for the record, that picture wasn't nearly as bad as you probably think it is. Why the heck was it removed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
It was a baboon family, wasn't it? And they were nekkid. Mods are on the job these days.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kermo

Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Location: Eating eggs, with a comb, out of a shoe.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JongnoGuru wrote: |
It was a baboon family, wasn't it? And they were nekkid. Mods are on the job these days.  |
They weren't even wearing pants. I should have Photoshoppd some in. The concept was that the big monkey was pulling the younger monkey's leg. Get it? Leg-pulling? Yeah, I thought so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kermo wrote: |
| JongnoGuru wrote: |
It was a baboon family, wasn't it? And they were nekkid. Mods are on the job these days.  |
They weren't even wearing pants. I should have Photoshoppd some in. The concept was that the big monkey was pulling the younger monkey's leg. Get it? Leg-pulling? Yeah, I thought so. |
I thought you were saying Kinsey measured baboon males, not human males. Anyway, I think it has to be the tamest photo ever deleted. Far tamer than the one I was going to post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| billybrobby wrote: |
| Wrench wrote: |
http://wwwu.edu.uni-klu.ac.at/amiklaut/dr_nick/answer19.htm
Sorry the average size of a *beep* is 6.16 inches and any one that says 9.5 inches as average you are smoking crack. |
hahaha!! 6 inches?? dude, you couldn't even get it out of your fly to take whizz with! tiny!
don't listen to this Dr. Nick. the Simpsons had a Dr. Nick too. it's just some feel-good crap for dudes with small ones. if you look at the real medical journals, they'll tell you that the average size is 9.5 worldwide. In America, where people are taller than other countries, it's between 10.5 and 11. |
9 inches of coke-can is all I've ever needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
neandergirl

Joined: 23 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought it meant Kinsey, I, or BillyBrobby had gotten the information out of a baboon's arse. I was going to post a picture of a bonobo in response but am kinda of glad I didn't now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zyzyfer

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?
|
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JongnoGuru wrote: |
It was a baboon family, wasn't it? And they were nekkid. Mods are on the job these days.  |
Shut up and go build something --  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mateomiguel wrote: |
The kama sutra says that there are three sizes. It gives them animal equivalence names. I think for women its rabbit, deer, and elephant. Of course I could be intentionally misremembering the animal designations, but hey lets go with that. For men its like chipmunk, donkey, and gorilla. Or something.
Anyways, the Kama Sutra states that couples should be paired up with equivalent sizes. Chipmunks should hump rabbits, donkeys should mount deer, and gorillas can attempt elephants.
Furthermore, small-medium pairings such as chipmunk-entering-deer and rabbit-accepting-donkey seem to work out alright. Large-medium pairings such as donkey-braving-elephant or gorilla-shocking-deer seem to work out fine too. However, it states that extremes of either type coming together, such as chipmunk-losing-itself-within-elephant or gorilla-destroying-rabbit, are disastrous for all involved.
I've not found the Kama Sutra to be wrong yet, even after extensive study. I guess the only thing left for you to do is to find out if you're a chipmunk, donkey, or gorilla. Perhaps Trojan can help you with that.
but, uh, i'm a guy, so i guess you weren't asking me. |
(Courtesy of Rteacher [of course -who else?])
How about tigers mounting elks?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
europe2seoul
Joined: 12 Sep 2005 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SweetBear wrote: |
Right on sista ! Though I don't mind thinking about them once in a great while. Think clean, circumcised and very very clean.... |
Igoo.....circumcised???? You must be kidding me.....its like the worst thing that can happen to a man. I would rather shoot myself then get my son circumcised - thank God to Europe and its customs (btw. I am from Europe aka. not circumcised!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SweetBear wrote: |
Right on sista ! Though I don't mind thinking about them once in a great while. Think clean, circumcised and very very clean.... |
Lol, you wrote "clean" three times, you must have bad some bad experiences. But seriously, what kind of adult doesn't take a shower once a day and take care with washing thier equipment? Are there really many people like this out there?
Last edited by Satori on Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Canadian Club
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh I've seen some less-than-clean ones. Just because *you* have good hygene habits, doesn't mean that others do as well.
Just Say No.
I'll second the clean, clean, clean. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
happygirl

Joined: 20 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
| i_teach_esl wrote: |
| and lap up milk like a good little kitten. |
I don't think many men who still have thier *beep* attached to thier body would relate to that imagery... |
i don't think you quite understood the imagery |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| happygirl wrote: |
| Satori wrote: |
| i_teach_esl wrote: |
| and lap up milk like a good little kitten. |
I don't think many men who still have thier *beep* attached to thier body would relate to that imagery... |
i don't think you quite understood the imagery |
Oh I understand what act is being represented. I'm just not happy with the tone and connotations of the imagery... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|