Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Learning Korean: opportunity cost vs. benefit
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PatrickGHBusan



Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with your last points completely Sean.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saw this online:
Quote:
I've watched over a hundred people live in Korea while using Korean as their primary language for 18-24 months, and helped teach a handful of them directly. Only the absolutely most motivated 1~2% of them reached anything beyond even middle-ground with passable, conversational, Korean ability

A LOT of those who put in a ton of effort end up with crap abilities. https://vivaling.com/children-can-really-learn/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kepler



Joined: 24 Sep 2007

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It took this guy nearly a decade to approach native like fluency in Korean, and he is very, very good at learning languages:

"For five or six years, before I married and had children, I would study for 16 hours a day. I'd transcribe Irish, Persian, Hindi, Turkish, Swahili. Gradually, all these wonderful languages started to swim into focus, and ever increasing numbers of great works became accessible....

"Now, I can read about three dozen languages and speak most of them fluently, and I've studied many more....

"Exotic languages can be more of a challenge. I worked as a professor in Korea for eight years and it took almost a decade to get my Korean skills close to native level. We live in Singapore now, and at home I speak French with my sons, unless my Korean wife is there, in which case we'll use English. If we don't want the kids to understand everything we're saying, we use Korean."
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2012/mar/16/i-speak-50-languages-experience

I am reminded of a Russian proverb:

"If you chase two rabbits, you will not catch either one."

The more time you spend learning Korean the less time you have to do other things. If you spend a year learning Korean and later decide your time could have been better spent then that is one year you can never get back. It is gone forever. I don't think learning Korean beyond a basic level would be worth it for most foreign teachers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PRagic



Joined: 24 Feb 2006

PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Think I read somewhere that Korean is the 14th most widely spoken language in the world, particulary given the large diaspora.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PatrickGHBusan



Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Something funny in the message posted by Kepler. I mean the guys says he speaks and reads dozens of languages fluently and lists Hindi, Persian and Swahili in that bunch.

Then as a contrast he discusses Korean as a exotic language that is harder to learn.

It may be just me but Swahili and Persian do not strike me as non-exotic or simple languages to learn when compared to Korean.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adam Carolla



Joined: 26 Feb 2010

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PatrickGHBusan wrote:
Something funny in the message posted by Kepler. I mean the guys says he speaks and reads dozens of languages fluently and lists Hindi, Persian and Swahili in that bunch.

Then as a contrast he discusses Korean as a exotic language that is harder to learn.

It may be just me but Swahili and Persian do not strike me as non-exotic or simple languages to learn when compared to Korean.


http://www.effectivelanguagelearning.com/language-guide/language-difficulty

1,100 hours (Category 4) vs. 2,200 hours (Category 5.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kepler



Joined: 24 Sep 2007

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hindi and Persian are Indo-European languages so I would expect them to be easier to learn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
creeper1



Joined: 30 Jan 2007

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kepler wrote:


The more time you spend learning Korean the less time you have to do other things. If you spend a year learning Korean and later decide your time could have been better spent then that is one year you can never get back. It is gone forever. I don't think learning Korean beyond a basic level would be worth it for most foreign teachers.


So what else could we be doing? I guess we could post on Dave's but most things outside your front door are going to involve using the native language of the country you are living in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PatrickGHBusan wrote:
Something funny in the message posted by Kepler. I mean the guys says he speaks and reads dozens of languages fluently and lists Hindi, Persian and Swahili in that bunch.

Then as a contrast he discusses Korean as a exotic language that is harder to learn.

It may be just me but Swahili and Persian do not strike me as non-exotic or simple languages to learn when compared to Korean.


As I understand it, Persian is actually a relatively easy language to learn, with the biggest difficulty being finding adequate materials. I've actually read a reasonable amount written by Dr. Arguelles (the polygot in Kepler's article), and he's always consistently said that Korean was an especially challenging language. I believe him, because it's true. Were Korean still written in 국한문혼용체 instead of pure Hangeul, it would be unambiguously the hardest major language for English speakers to learn. Because it's generally written in pure Hangeul, it's more questionable whether it is harder than Japanese or not, with one's ability to memorize characters being a key factor. There are some minor languages which would probably be more challenging to learn, but even having the opportunity to learn such a language is quite uncommon, much less the incentive.

But remember, when Dr. Arguelles talks about it taking 10 years to learn Korean, he's talking about achieving a level of proficiency which allows one to pick up a thick book and read it comfortably, not merely superficial conversational proficiency. When he says "native fluency," he means using the language with the competency and ease of a highly proficient, highly educated native speaker. This is also why he stresses the importance of Hanja: if you want to be able read dense academic texts properly, and grasp the meaning of uncommon terms, Hanja will be a real asset.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PRagic



Joined: 24 Feb 2006

PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unless you wait for reunification and the head up north. They don't use hanja up in dem dar parts...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SeoulNate



Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Location: Hyehwa

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

World Traveler wrote:
Saw this online:
Quote:
I've watched over a hundred people live in Korea while using Korean as their primary language for 18-24 months, and helped teach a handful of them directly. Only the absolutely most motivated 1~2% of them reached anything beyond even middle-ground with passable, conversational, Korean ability

A LOT of those who put in a ton of effort end up with crap abilities. https://vivaling.com/children-can-really-learn/


This is probably the millionth time you have posted this kind of crap on here. There is ZERO quantifiable research that has been done recently to prove what he writes in the article (addressing CPH for 2nd LL).

In fact, the vast majority of research that was completed in the last few decades on the subject has shown adults to be vastly superior when it comes to learning language when given the same amount of time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PatrickGHBusan



Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the responses, most interesting.

I still think Swahili would qualify as an exotic language and would be hard to learn.

The one point I will make concerning learning a language is that there 4 key factors that will determine how well a person learns a new language and what level of proficiency they can attain (these are my observations as a language learner and what I have seen in others):

1- Motivation: if your motivation(s) to learn are deep set and mostly intrinsic in nature you will overcome difficulties in learning more easily, regardless of the target language.

2- Having learned a second language already in your life: this will make it a ton easier as you already have strategies in place and experience with the challenges and efficient pathways to learning a language

3- Context: Are you in an "immersion" setting? Do you have access to varied practice opportunities? Do you have the time to devote to the language.

4- Goal: Why are you learning this language and to what end (full fluency, conversational fluency, reading fluency...)? This ties into motivation above and it will determine how far you go.


If all of these factors are clear for you then you will not see spending time learning a new language as a "waste" or as "preventing you from doing something else".

Taking 3 examples to illustrate this (from my immediate family):

1- My brother: He has been living in Japan for nearly 20 years by now. He got married to a local woman after a couple of years there. His motivation was high and intrinsic because he wanted to learn Japanese to be able to communicate with his wife's family but also to become more autonomous in Japan as a foreign resident. He also wanted to open more employment doors. He had, like myself, already learned a "second" language (French) to fluency. His context was highly favorable as he was in immersion and had ample opportunity to practice which further fueled his level of motivation. He reached what I consider to be full fluency within a couple of years.

2- My wife: She moved to Canada with me in 2008. Since then she has learned French to what I consider to be conversational fluency. Her motivation was reasonably high and it was based on external factors: employment and cultural adaptability in her new country. Her goal was employment and family driven. She had a reasonably favorable context even if we live in an area that is not predominantly French. She had already learned a second language in Korea (English) to reasonable fluency. She reached conversational fluency in French within 3 years here in Canada.

3- My friend Allan, from Canada (Toronto), lived in Korea for 6 years, now in China. He had mid-level motivation to learn Korean, mostly to enable himself to get around the country on his own and to speak to his Korean friends. He had not second language when he arrived in Korea. He had favorable immersion context as he was living in Korea but he also had a limited goal. He stalled at intermediate Korean, meaning he can engage in very basic conversation and basic reading. That was fine for him, he needed nothing more and he frankly found the effort required to move to a higher level to be too much for him.


The overall point I am trying to make is that motivation, goals, context and pre-conditions (language learning history) can all trump the difficulty associated with learning a new language. To me the difficulty of a language is far less relevant to end state success than why the learner is trying to learn this language, in what context and to what end...

Fox you made an interesting point but I can tell you that I am able to read "dense academic texts" without too many hurdles. This goes for novels as well.

Just my two cents.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SeoulNate wrote:
the vast majority of research that was completed in the last few decades on the subject has shown adults to be vastly superior when it comes to learning language when given the same amount of time.

Absolutely not.

Well, it depends on what is being measured. If we are talking about high level academic vocabulary, yes.

On the other hand, if we are talking more functional- the ability to correctly pronounce and hear common words, kids win.

Kids have better pronunciation- they pick it up more quickly and easily. Same with distinguishing sounds.

Speaking and listening - kids.

Reading and writing - adults.

Which skill set do you think is more commonly used in everyday interaction?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PatrickGHBusan wrote:

Just my two cents.


Motivation is definitely important, and having language-learning experience is particularly valuable. Of the people I know who have made efforts to learn Korean, the who were already bilingual have tended to fare better. Of course, this also illustrates why many fail: adult language acquisition is a skill, and can be pursued either effectively or ineffectively, so if you do not already know how to go about it, you can easily run into trouble. Chinese has been much easier for me than Korean, partially because it is a slightly easier Ianguage, but also because I had a better approach from the start, giving me better results with less effort.

If a lazy fellow like me can do it with consistent-but-small efforts, anyone can, so long as they do it properly. And I do believe a talented language learner, which you sound to be, could reach advanced academic proficiency without Hanja, but for people like myself, they really do help.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox wrote:
Of the people I know who have made efforts to learn Korean, the who were already bilingual have tended to fare better.

They have a larger database of sounds, which means better pronunciation and better listening ability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 6 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International