Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Is the US headed for Civil War?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:44 pm    Post subject: Re: re: Reply with quote

seoulunitarian wrote:
wannago wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
That's the major problem with our government in my opinion - it's like 50 little countries.


As it was designed to be...and should be.


As it was designed to be, no doubt, but not as it should be today. The republic was established for reasons no longer valid in our modern society.

Peace


So what do you think should be in its place instead?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:59 pm    Post subject: Re: re: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
wannago wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
That's the major problem with our government in my opinion - it's like 50 little countries.


As it was designed to be...and should be.


As it was designed to be, no doubt, but not as it should be today. The republic was established for reasons no longer valid in our modern society.

Peace


So what do you think should be in its place instead?


THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION Idea

Univision Republican Debate
December 9 2007
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDMXJJsNUCU

Spanish Americans Crazy 4 ... RON PAUL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oq6QA-_vkxw&feature=related
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
seoulunitarian



Joined: 06 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:18 pm    Post subject: Re: re: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
wannago wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
That's the major problem with our government in my opinion - it's like 50 little countries.


As it was designed to be...and should be.


As it was designed to be, no doubt, but not as it should be today. The republic was established for reasons no longer valid in our modern society.

Peace


So what do you think should be in its place instead?


A federal, democratic, socialist state.

Peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
Czarjorge wrote:


Even so, I don't think we're strictly a republic. The existence of the electoral college convolutes the issue considerably. Some definitions state that the people "directly or indirectly" elect their officials, but that seems to be stretching the definition, to me at least.


Hence democratic republic and not just republic.

Quote:
We're definitely NOT 50 countries. If we were we would be more like the EU, where some laws are multinational, but individual nations still have the right to determine what is legal in their own country. Can Arizona legalized marijuana? Can Nevada legalize prostitution? No, federal laws preempt national laws, so we're NOT 50 seperate countries. In the future we may need to be for the sake of international competition.


Well there is the 10th amendment, and EU law pre-empts national laws as well. each state has its own constitution and branches of govt mirroring the federal government's.

And Arizona did legalize marijuana, as did CA, albeit for medicinal purposes.


Saying republic and democratic republic is pretty much redundant.

The EU's ability to trump national law is very limited.

Federal agencies regularly go into California and raid and arrest "legal" purveyors of marijuana. I've not heard of specific examples of that happening in Arizona, but I'm sure it's happening, there's just less media attention on Arizona.

seoulunitarian wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
wannago wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
That's the major problem with our government in my opinion - it's like 50 little countries.


As it was designed to be...and should be.


As it was designed to be, no doubt, but not as it should be today. The republic was established for reasons no longer valid in our modern society.

Peace


So what do you think should be in its place instead?


A federal, democratic, socialist state.

Peace


Seoulunitarian, what would that look like? Have you read much Marx? I think deep down Marx was less of a Communist, a title he denied, and more of a futurist. Some aspects of society should be capitalist, others socialist, and still others communist. Ideally the goal is to seperate economics and government as much as possible. The opposite of what most "communists" have actually done, the NORK being a perfect example of that.

And what's with the "Peace" as a sign off?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoulunitarian



Joined: 06 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:34 pm    Post subject: re: Reply with quote

Czarjorge wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
Czarjorge wrote:


Even so, I don't think we're strictly a republic. The existence of the electoral college convolutes the issue considerably. Some definitions state that the people "directly or indirectly" elect their officials, but that seems to be stretching the definition, to me at least.


Hence democratic republic and not just republic.

Quote:
We're definitely NOT 50 countries. If we were we would be more like the EU, where some laws are multinational, but individual nations still have the right to determine what is legal in their own country. Can Arizona legalized marijuana? Can Nevada legalize prostitution? No, federal laws preempt national laws, so we're NOT 50 seperate countries. In the future we may need to be for the sake of international competition.


Well there is the 10th amendment, and EU law pre-empts national laws as well. each state has its own constitution and branches of govt mirroring the federal government's.

And Arizona did legalize marijuana, as did CA, albeit for medicinal purposes.


Saying republic and democratic republic is pretty much redundant.

The EU's ability to trump national law is very limited.

Federal agencies regularly go into California and raid and arrest "legal" purveyors of marijuana. I've not heard of specific examples of that happening in Arizona, but I'm sure it's happening, there's just less media attention on Arizona.

seoulunitarian wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
wannago wrote:
seoulunitarian wrote:
That's the major problem with our government in my opinion - it's like 50 little countries.


As it was designed to be...and should be.


As it was designed to be, no doubt, but not as it should be today. The republic was established for reasons no longer valid in our modern society.

Peace


So what do you think should be in its place instead?


A federal, democratic, socialist state.

Peace


Seoulunitarian, what would that look like? Have you read much Marx? I think deep down Marx was less of a Communist, a title he denied, and more of a futurist. Some aspects of society should be capitalist, others socialist, and still others communist. Ideally the goal is to seperate economics and government as much as possible. The opposite of what most "communists" have actually done, the NORK being a perfect example of that.

And what's with the "Peace" as a sign off?


The only thing I know for sure is that it would not look like anything that has ever existed before in its ideal form.

Ideals are never reached, though, so for all practical purposes, I guess it would be something akin to Sweden.

Is there something wrong with peace?

Peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, but it seems... hokey to me. Like a person who recently got into hip hop and thinks it's still hip to say that.

And I suppose peace without meaning I do have an issue with. It's one of those ideals you mentioned.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Saying republic and democratic republic is pretty much redundant.


Someone living in an aristocratic republic, oligarchic republic or theocratic republic might not agree with that statement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Saying republic and democratic republic is pretty much redundant.


Someone living in an aristocratic republic, oligarchic republic or theocratic republic might not agree with that statement.


couldn't have said it better myself. There is a difference between the two terms.

Quote:
No, but it seems... hokey to me. Like a person who recently got into hip hop and thinks it's still hip to say that.

And I suppose peace without meaning I do have an issue with. It's one of those ideals you mentioned.


And this as well.

Quote:
The EU's ability to trump national law is very limited.


Eh not really. Are you very familiar with the EU? It is more encompassing and powerful than you might think. Yikes, I just sounded like a RP supporter describing the US gov't. Oh well, can't think of a better way to put it right now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Saying republic and democratic republic is pretty much redundant.


Someone living in an aristocratic republic, oligarchic republic or theocratic republic might not agree with that statement.


Touche. I overreached in my argument. I should have remembered Plato.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoulunitarian



Joined: 06 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:12 pm    Post subject: re: Reply with quote

Czarjorge wrote:
No, but it seems... hokey to me. Like a person who recently got into hip hop and thinks it's still hip to say that.

And I suppose peace without meaning I do have an issue with. It's one of those ideals you mentioned.


Peace without meaning? Isn't peace extremely meaningful on its own?

Peace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, it's not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There never was a good war or a bad peace. (Ben Franklin)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Ben Franklin

It all depends on your definition of peace.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old boys have their playthings as well as young ones; the difference is only in the price.


(I don't think that relates, but it's cute and I couldn't find another BF quote to keep this going.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:59 pm    Post subject: Re: re: Reply with quote

seoulunitarian wrote:
Czarjorge wrote:
No, but it seems... hokey to me. Like a person who recently got into hip hop and thinks it's still hip to say that.

And I suppose peace without meaning I do have an issue with. It's one of those ideals you mentioned.


Peace without meaning? Isn't peace extremely meaningful on its own?

Peace


Yes. He is just arguing with you for the sake of argument. I've always understood why you use 'peace' at the end of your posts. I respect it. But this is only cause I know your positions on most issues.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 7 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International