Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Another shooting in America
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Yeah, I thought as much.

Perhaps you could do it with a bow and arrow or a spear that way you'll really be getting back to being primordial. I'd imagine it'd make it a bit more exciting too if you had to kill with your bare hands.


We do bow-hunt from time to time. I personally prefer guns. The bow is not more difficult to use.

When we shoot the gophers (bastards dig holes and the cattle steps in the holes and break their legs) we use .22's. An arrow would be inefficient.
Quote:

Sorry, but your reasons for owning a gun may be legit even neccessary, but I couldn't care less. You being able to shoot hippos or whatever the hell it is you shoot up there doesn't really go far enough to convincing me that you need a gun in your life..


Thankfully I don't have to convince you!
Quote:

Nor does it extend to justifying why a significant percentage of America's 300million + population can own one either.


Because they 1) want to and 2) it is in the constitution. I'm from Canada.
Quote:

Given the choice of (1) stopping some lunatic going on the rampage and killing a dozen or so kids and (2) you not having moose pie isn't much of a contest to be honest.


That is what we thinking people call a false choice.


Some thug in MillWoods shooting up his competition in the drug market has nothing to do with the rifles on my wall. Also, some lunatic kid who shoots up a school has nothing to do with me.

It should also be noted that the school in question had a strictly enforced "no guns" policy. Surprise! Only the outlaw had a gun. The rest of the obedient kids were unarmed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BS.Dos.



Joined: 29 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's a lot of people who sit on the pro-gun fence. Conversely, there's a lot who sit on the other side.

There's a lot of people who can see a conection between these mass killings and gun ownership and there's a lot of people who don't.

Canada makes a very good case for the pro-gun argument.
America makes a very good case for the anti-gun argument.

Shrugging your shoulders everytime another dozen teenagers get wasted doesn't seem to be working but I don't think that this problem is without a possible solution.

What would be the public response in Canada if there was a sudden rise in these sorts of crimes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ultra



Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Location: Book Han Gook Land Of Opportunity

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Citizens Committee for the
Right to Keep and Bear Arms
12500 N.E. Tenth Place
Bellevue, WA 98005

CANADA'S GUN REGISTRATION FAILURE: VIOLENT CRIME RATE DOUBLE THAT OF U.S.

BELLEVUE, WA � Canada's billion-dollar boondoggle � the national gun registration scheme � has proven itself an abysmal failure, as that country's violent crime rates are double those reported in the United States, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) noted today.

"We looked at violent crime rates per 100,000 population in both countries, using the most recent available data," said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, "and we were not surprised at what we found. Since Canada started this ridiculous and costly program, violent crime has gone up dramatically, at the same time that crime in the United States has declined. Yet, there are people in the states who think Canada's gun legislation should be the model for America.

"By comparing the data," he detailed, "we found that the violent crime rate in the United States was 475 per 100,000 population, while up north, there were 963 violent crimes per 100,000 population. The figure for sexual assault in Canada per 100,000 population is more than double that of the United States, 74 as opposed to 32.1, and the assault rate in Canada is also more than twice that of the states, 746 to our 295 for the population rate."

Noted CCRKBA Executive Director Joe Waldron: "What happened in the states to actually contribute to a reduction in our overall crime rate is simple. We've got 38 states with shall-issue, right-to-carry concealed handgun laws. While Canada has clamped down on its citizens' gun rights, our citizens have been empowered against criminals by passage of these laws. The disparity in crime rates between the two countries says it all about how well gun registration works to stop crime, as opposed to actually carrying guns to deter criminals, and fight back if necessary."

A Jan. 3 story in Canada's National Post by writer David Frum confirmed CCRKBA's independent finding. Frum wrote, "Canada's overall crime rate is now 50% higher than the crime rate in the United States." Later, Frum added: "Gun registries and gun bans�do not work."

"Instead of promising to ban legally-owned handguns in Canada," Waldron observed, "Prime Minister Paul Martin should be urging citizens to arm themselves. He should encourage Parliament to scrap gun registration and replace it with a gun ownership and training program."

"Since going on the warpath against guns, Canada's Liberals have presided over the sharpest rise in violent crime in the nation's history," Gottlieb said. "There are more rapes, more robberies and more murders. If that tells Canadian citizens anything at all, it's that Paul Martin and his Liberals have literally been �dead wrong' on guns."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Shrugging your shoulders everytime another dozen teenagers get wasted doesn't seem to be working but I don't think that this problem is without a possible solution.

Who is shrugging? These school shooting are terrible. The guns were bought legally in this case and in the VTech massacre and it probably should be the case that guns should be more difficult to get. Also, there is no reason for anybody to own an automatic weapon, though these are seldom used in crimes.

Why don't these shootings happen in Switzerland, Venezuela or elsewhere with high rates of firearm ownership? It seems to me that this is a very local phenomenon.

In addition, guns are here (their queer, get used to it!). This idea that they can be fully removed from society is nonsense. More nuanced policy needs to be proposed.
Quote:

What would be the public response in Canada if there was a sudden rise in these sorts of crimes?


There has been a rather large increase in gun crimes in Canada as of late. The response of the public is to "ban" an already banned product: handguns. In Canada, people don't like to have honest discussions about topics like this.

Look at the UK, which totally "banned" guns (meaning, gave a monopoly on guns to criminals). Gun crimes went up. In fact, all crime went up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Hale



Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Location: the Straight Talk Express

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wikipedia's gun violence stats are based on 1999; nevertheless taking a look at the stats of the US, Canada and England + Wales backs up my point about culture/society rather than law. Guns are just as popular in Canada and protected by the constitution, yet in Canada the likelihood of being shot is 28% of that in the US, whereas, more interestingly - since Canada being a less violent and insane society than the US is hardly headline news - the likelihood of being shot in England and Wales is 71% of that in Canada, meaning England/Wales have a societal and cultural problem with guns despite total illegality and Canada doesn't have much of a problem at all considering guns aren't prohibited.

I don't recommend total prohibition of guns in the US at all; I think it'd be a disaster like prohibition of alcohol. America is not Saudi Arabia where prohibition does somewhat work. Americans want to drink. Prohibition was repealed for a reason. Likewise, the Americans are not the Dutch or the Spanish with regard to guns and so it's dreamland stuff to suppose American gun violence stats will go down to Netherlands and Spain levels solely via prohibition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BS.Dos.



Joined: 29 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thepeel wrote:
Who is shrugging? These school shooting are terrible. The guns were bought legally in this case and in the VTech massacre and it probably should be the case that guns should be more difficult to get. Also, there is no reason for anybody to own an automatic weapon, though these are seldom used in crimes.


Not you specifically rather society in general. Every time this kind of thing happens there seems to be a collective shrug, the same arguments get banded about and then everything settles down until the next one.

Quote:
Why don't these shootings happen in Switzerland, Venezuela or elsewhere with high rates of firearm ownership? It seems to me that this is a very local phenomenon.


Yeah, for sure. Why is there such a culture of violence in the US in comparison to other countries? And, If you accept that there is a culture of violence specific to the US, then surely it follows that you'd do more to limit the potential for violence and maybe look at controlling the use of firearms.

Quote:
In addition, guns are here (their *beep*, get used to it!). This idea that they can be fully removed from society is nonsense. More nuanced policy needs to be proposed.


I'm not of the opinion that we should get used to it. They exist, but that's not to say that there's nothing that can be done to limit the risks (all countries with high gun ownership also have a significantly higher number of both gun deaths and injuries than those that don't). You can't simply concede defeat just because there are so many of them currently in circulation.

Quote:
There has been a rather large increase in gun crimes in Canada as of late. The response of the public is to "ban" an already banned product: handguns. In Canada, people don't like to have honest discussions about topics like this. Look at the UK, which totally "banned" guns (meaning, gave a monopoly on guns to criminals). Gun crimes went up. In fact, all crime went up.


The reason gun crime has gone up in the UK as you point out, has as much to do with other societal problems, mainly drugs, as it has to the inability of customs to stop the number of guns coming into the country. Gun crime didn't rise because we banned guns and to suggest it did is ridiculous. Besides, we're responding to a mass shooting rather than specific criminal activity. Measures have been introduced so as to address the problem of indiscriminate mass shootings, measures which have resulted in there not being any mass shootings in the UK for sometime, which kind of speaks for itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wildbore



Joined: 17 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BS.Dos. wrote:
The reason gun crime has gone up in the UK as you point out, has as much to do with other societal problems, mainly drugs, as it has to the inability of customs to stop the number of guns coming into the country. Gun crime didn't rise because we banned guns and to suggest it did is ridiculous. Besides, we're responding to a mass shooting rather than specific criminal activity. Measures have been introduced so as to address the problem of indiscriminate mass shootings, measures which have resulted in there not being any mass shootings in the UK for sometime, which kind of speaks for itself.


All the UK bans did was confiscate semi-autos and handguns from licensed, police-vetted target shooters. Basically they took away recreational firearms from hobbyists who are the least likely to harm someone. As for the criminals, they just laughed and kept their guns.

I guess you forgot about the Cumbria massacre 2 years ago. Some guy grabbed a bolt-action rifle used for varmint control and killed 12 people, and injured 11 more. Thank god David Cameron was just elected at the time. The UK people were spared from more useless "knee-jerk" gun control.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why did you dig up a thread from 5 years ago? Especially when there are much more recent posts on guns on this board. Random.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
le-paul



Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Location: dans la chambre

PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

discussing guns/ownership is akin to discussing religion. Youre very rarely going to dissuade someone from their ingrained, personal beliefs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Titus



Joined: 19 May 2012

PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://news.yahoo.com/two-teenage-boys-arrested-georgia-baby-shooting-death-205206658--abc-news-topstories.html

Quote:
Sherry West, the 41-year-old mother of the child, told police she'd been walking her 13-month-old son, Antonio, in a stroller Thursday morning through their Brunswick, Ga., neighborhood when two African-American boys approached her and demanded money. When she told them she didn't have any money, West said one of the boys pulled out a handgun.

"He said, 'I'm going to kill you if you don't give me money,' and I said, 'I swear I don't have any,"' West told WAWS-TV in Jacksonville, Fla.

West said she tried to shield her child with her arms, but the gunman shoved her and shot the baby in the head. West was shot in the leg.

Going on West's description, police said they began looking for two African-American boys between the ages of 10 and 15 years old since Thursday. No details about how the suspects were arrested were given.


^ An example of why whites cling to god and guns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigverne



Joined: 12 May 2004

PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder what the media reaction would have been had a young white thug murdered a black infant in cold blood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Titus



Joined: 19 May 2012

PostPosted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/25/george-zimmermans-brother-robert-zimmerman-jr_n_2948210.html

Good on him for defending his brother.

Quote:
I wonder what the media reaction would have been had a young white thug murdered a black infant in cold blood.


Oh it'd never end.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International