Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

University writing woes: Freedom vs Strictness (too long!)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hyeon Een



Joined: 24 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:00 am    Post subject: University writing woes: Freedom vs Strictness (too long!) Reply with quote

I have received some good advice before on this forum, and I'm looking for a little more. Currently I am teaching a class titled "Advanced Writing". Despite the class name, the level of the students is really, really mixed. They vary from sophomore French majors who know little English, to 11th year English Education seniors (on the slow track..) to a native speaker exchange student from the USA. It's a really mixed class.

At the beginning of the semester I got the students to produce a piece of writing for me so that I could judge the level of the class. The biggest problem I saw was students 'trying too hard'. That may not sound like a problem, but I think I should explain better: What I mean is that students tried to write incredibly long, complex sentences, using words, idioms, phrasal verbs etc.
that they didn't really know in order to impress me. They knew that it was an 'advanced writing' class, so they tried to produce 'advanced writing' right from the beginning, without having the ability to do so. (Obviously there were a few exceptions, such as a couple of students who've lived abroad for a year or two and the native speaker).

Most of the work I received was basically un-intelligible except to those of us who are used to reading essays written by Koreans trying to use words they don't know. They tried to produce incredibly complex sentences, four, five, even six lines long using all kinds of clauses and conjunctions they couldn't actually use.

After receiving this disappointing first attempt at writing, I decided to try and change their style of writing. Basically, I tried to make them write more simply. I asked them to use simple, short sentences to get their ideas across. I asked them to use words that they know how to use, instead of using the dictionary or thesaurus to try and find 'impressive' words. 95% of the students have a huge vocabulary as it is, they don't need to go finding new words; they just need to use the words they already know correctly.(I'd go as far as to say that in terms of non-slang words at least 50% of my class have a larger vocabulary than the average native speaker) Furthermore long sentences are less impressive in English than they are in Korean. In Korean you will find super long sentences and it is considered good writing. In English super long sentences are difficult to understand, and when written by students at my students' level almost always so incorrect that they're impossible to understand.

In my opinion, their writing has improved ten fold with regards to what they're handing in to me as a finished product. Now what they produce varies between perfect, and easily understandable to any native speaker but with a few mistakes.

However today one of my students said something to me which got me thinking. As well as my writing class, he is also taking an 'intermediate' level writing class with a Korean professor. He told me today that his Korean professor has been encouraging them to experiment a lot with their writing: try new things; attempt to write in new ways; try to use more advanced grammar etc. He told me that he feels that he is a lot 'freer' in his intermediate level class than he is in mine. He feels that in my class he has to write simply and use perfect grammar, rather than trying to advance his English by trying new things as he does in the Korean teacher's class.

This situation is almost the opposite of what is often experienced in Korea. Apparantely I, the foreign teacher, am being strict and rigid, and the Korean teacher is much more open minded and encouraging experimentation etc.

I really didn't think that this was the way my class had gone. I thought that they had greatly improved their written English. I am a little worried that my students (well, one of them) feel that I am simply limiting them to 'simple' English.

In defense of my policy of getting them to write sentences they KNOW are correct when writing essays, I will say this: During the time they are planning and drafting their writing I am always available. They are welcome to ask me at any time whether a sentence they've produced is correct, or whether they've used a new word in the right way or whatever. It is just that I expect that when their final pieces of work are turned in a native speaker should be able to understand it instead of needing to ask the student what the hell they meant in their 5 line long rambling sentence.


So I'm asking for advice. Am I wrong to encourage students to write short, simple sentences? Am I limiting the development of their skills?

Thanks.

PS. Strangely, the best writer in the class is NOT the American. The best writer is a Korean girl who studied in London for a couple of years. I suspect this might be because the American girl assumes she's going to be perfect and rushes off her work in a 'stream of consciousness' style of writing in the minimum time possible though, whereas the Korean students spend hours and hours on their work.

PPS. Please don't criticise my writing today, I drank a bottle of wine earlier =) (Oh and don't complain about that either, I don't have classes on a Friday)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gk



Joined: 27 May 2007

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Make sure they know the difference between "simple" and "economic" use of language. Sometimes using a word you learned while studying for the GRE can obscure or make ambiguous the point of your sentence when often a much simpler one will suffice. The same holds for grammar. I think your policy of telling students to only use what they are positive about is stifling as it ignores the fact that making errors is completely natural (even in an advanced class).

What I would suggest is doing some sentence workshopping with some of their writing samples. Take 3 sentences that are excessively wordy, sophomoric or grammatically convoluted. Show the students how to rewrite the sentence in a more precise way while still retaining the meaning. You can ask the class for their ideas as well, but have your own suggestions prepared ahead of time. Just to keep some balance and show that big words are ok, do the reverse as well. Take 3 sentences that are too simple in either their grammar or word choice. Same procedure, poll the class for ideas but have your own prepared. Also, make sure you keep everything anonymous if you are taking sentences from the students' writing. Hopefully they will learn the difference between expressing their ideas precisely and lexical overkill.

You seem to be in a sort of awkward situation, which sucks. However, you should always err on the side of "encouraging experimentation" if you have any doubts. It would be alright to insist that they don't make the same mistake twice, however.

Edit:
Here's an example of the spirit of doing this kind of activity courtesy of Benjamin Franklin. It relates to drafting the Declaration of Independence more than improving the writing of ESL students, but maybe somebody will get a chuckle out of it.

Quote:
"I have made a rule, whenever in my power, to avoid becoming the draughtsman of papers to be reviewed by a public body. I took my lesson from an incident which I will relate to you. When I was a journeyman printer, one of my companions, an apprentice hatter, having served out his time, was about to open shop for himself. His first concern was to have a handsome signboard, with a proper inscription. He composed it in these words, 'John Thompson, Hatter, makes and sells hats for ready money,' with a figure of a hat subjoined. But thought he would submit it to his friends for their amendments. The first he showed it to thought the word 'Hatter' tautologous, because followed by the words 'makes hats,' which showed he was a hatter. It was struck out. The next observed that the word 'makes' might as well be omitted, because his customers would not care who made the hats. If good and to their mind, they would buy them, by whomsoever made. He struck it out. A third said he thought the words 'for ready money' were useless, as it was not the custom of the place to sell on credit. Every one who purchased expected to pay. They were parted with, and the inscription now stood, 'John Thompson sells hats.' 'Sells hats!' says the next friend. 'Why, nobody will expect you to give them away. What then is the use of that word?' It was stricken out, and 'hats' followed it, the rather as there was one painted on the board. So the inscription was reduced ultimately to 'John Thompson,' with the figure of a hat subjoined."


Last edited by gk on Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:53 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hyeon Een



Joined: 24 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gk wrote:

What I would suggest is doing some sentence workshopping with some of their writing samples. Take 3 sentences that are excessively wordy, sophomoric or grammatically convoluted. Show the students how to rewrite the sentence in a more precise way while still retaining the meaning. You can ask the class for their ideas as well, but have your own suggestions prepared ahead of time. Just to keep some balance and show that big words are ok, do the reverse as well. Take 3 sentences that are too simple in either their grammar or word choice. Same procedure, poll the class for ideas but have your own prepared. Also, make sure you keep everything anonymous if you are taking sentences from the students' writing. Hopefully they will learn the difference between expressing their ideas precisely and lexical overkill.


I quite like this idea. At the moment, after each assignment, I do some work on the most common errors the students have made (usually about half a dozen have made the same kind of error). I think working with these kind of sentences might be helpful.. I might try and do this with whatever they've produced in their midterm exam next week =)
gk wrote:

You seem to be in a sort of awkward situation, which sucks. However, you should always err on the side of "encouraging experimentation" if you have any doubts. It would be alright to insist that they don't make the same mistake twice, however.


My situation isn't too awkward, it is only ONE student, but he is making me think about the way I've been teaching the class. Also, this student took my 'Basic Writing' class last semester and was one of my biggest 'cheerleaders', and he signed up for this class because of me. I don't think he is too upset really, however he has given me something to think about.

I also DO make a big thing about them not making the same mistake twice/thrice/four times.. I encourage them to notice the kind of mistakes they are making, and then make sure they are not making them again the next time they submit something. However it sometimes seems pointless.. I have students make the same mistakes over, and over, and over and over. Some of them DO learn, however others just keep making the same mistakes, specifically with articles, subject-verb agreement, and count/non-count nouns with modifiers. I have done specific classes on these topics too. Doesn't seem to help some of them.. argh Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kat2



Joined: 25 Oct 2005
Location: Busan, South Korea

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had an excellent grammar/writing teacher in HS. She used to give us assignments where we had to write a paper (2-3 pages) but we had to use X number of prepositional phrases or adjective phrases or adverb clauses or whatever. We would obviously study what those were and the comma rules involved and look at some literature excerpts containg them earlier in the week. So, if we had studied adverb clauses that week, our final assignment was to write a 2 page paper using 8 adverb clauses and underline them. This is good b/c it taught us to use different kind of sentences but in a more controlled environment. It also taught us to be creative with our sentences b/c you had to use so many of a certain kind of clause/phrase. Try to do an assignemnt like that and see what they think. It's good to teach students to experiment, but they also need to know when to use what they know. This kind of assignment let's do them do both.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott in Incheon



Joined: 30 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I run my writing classes using portfolios. This allows the students the freedom to write what they want, but then they need to work on improving the essay throughout the semester. Nothing in my class is actually do until the end of the semester when the students hand in their portfolios.

This would allow you to help the students rewrite their texts and make them more readable without have such strict rules in place.

Our class works a lot on the editing process with each student having an editing partner and the writer acting as a editor as well. It is a long process, but soon they start looking at their writing differently.

The big thing is that they see it as a process and realize the first draft will never be that good, but that is okay because the second will show some improvement and then the 3rd and 4th....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
buster brown



Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It sounds like your student sees the value of what you're teaching. After all, accurate writing should be the first goal (in my opinion). Since it sounds like you've gotten them to a point where they're doing that, why not throw in some opportunities for creative writing? Give them pictures or topics and let them write whatever and however they'd like. You can use the results for the sentence workshopping that gk suggested, editing exercises, or peer editing.

In short-term classes I teach editing techniques more often than writing techniques because that's the best way to make their writing comprehensible. But it sounds like this one student is looking for a chance to try something different and get the native teacher's input on how successfully he can pull it off.

Be glad that what you've taught so far has improved their writing skills. But also be aware that they'll probably revert back to the big-word, long-sentence style with other teachers and future real-world writing because no matter how much you tell them otherwise, they believe that's the way to produce something impressive in English.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
articulate_ink



Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Location: Left Korea in 2008. Hong Kong now.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's been some good advice here, and I'd like to add a little. Your students need to understand the differences between different types of writing. In nonfiction, the experimentation encouraged by that Korean professor doesn't work so well. The first goal in essay writing (or business correspondence, or whatever else university students might need to do in English) should be clarity. That doesn't mean simplicity. People tend to confuse the two. A mix of shorter and longer sentences balances the writing and keeps the eye moving across the page. GRE words should only be used when the student knows both the dictionary definition and the connotation.

In my own composition classes, I tell the students up-front that I'm not teaching grammar. While I'll make a few editorial suggestions and will spend a certain amount of time on their most common error patterns, composition is a distinct body of knowledge. I focus heavily on format, unity, coherence, and organization. Grammar will be an ongoing process, and they tend to understand that too.

Unless you're teaching a creative writing class, I would suggest nipping that 'try new things' problem in the bud. There's room in fiction to experiment, but second-language learners who are taking composition classes need to focus on mastering the basics first.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International