View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:17 am Post subject: E-2 changes may include recruiter responsibility |
|
|
A Korean friend of mine who has an ear in some of the government's current discussions about future teacher requirements has refused to tell me much of anything about the new rules coming down the pipe for teachers. Man, I've all but begged him to give me any information possible, but he won't.
The only interesting thing he mentioned is that there are discussions about added paperwork and responsibility for recruiters (as if there weren't enough already, right?). The proposal is that, in the future, non-government recruiters will share financial responsibility if a placed teacher runs, commits a crime, or other offense. In effect, this means that if a placed teacher runs, the recruiter will be held responsible for any bills the teacher left unpaid (including airfare).
So if the teacher turns out to be a bad egg, the school or parents of an injured student, can file a claim for compensation against the recruiter -- smooth and easy, without the need for hiring expensive lawyers.
This smacks of attempts to control the recruiting industry, possibly at the financial gain of a few "connected" individuals. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:45 am Post subject: Re: E-2 changes may include recruiter responsibility |
|
|
bassexpander wrote: |
A Korean friend of mine who has an ear in some of the government's current discussions about future teacher requirements has refused to tell me much of anything about the new rules coming down the pipe for teachers. Man, I've all but begged him to give me any information possible, but he won't.
The only interesting thing he mentioned is that there are discussions about added paperwork and responsibility for recruiters (as if there weren't enough already, right?). The proposal is that, in the future, non-government recruiters will share financial responsibility if a placed teacher runs, commits a crime, or other offense. In effect, this means that if a placed teacher runs, the recruiter will be held responsible for any bills the teacher left unpaid (including airfare).
So if the teacher turns out to be a bad egg, the school or parents of an injured student, can file a claim for compensation against the recruiter -- smooth and easy, without the need for hiring expensive lawyers.
This smacks of attempts to control the recruiting industry, possibly at the financial gain of a few "connected" individuals. |
Sounds like a great plan. Ya, right. Another 1/2 baked idea, poorly thought out and no real idea of the implications or implimentation.
Stupidity at it's finest.
With about 1/2 the recruiters NOT being in Korea they are out of the jurisdiction of the law and immune from it's effects. This will give them a great advantage and the ability to still send warm bodies and keep the costs low. Korean recruiters will have to increase costs to make up for potential liabilities putting them at a great disadvantage.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do you expect they would pass such a law without making foreign recruitment illegal?
I wonder what is up their sleeve. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
bassexpander wrote: |
Do you expect they would pass such a law without making foreign recruitment illegal?
yes.
I wonder what is up their sleeve. |
And even if they made it illegal (even though doing so would be illegal under some of their trade agreements - and they can't change those unilaterally) what is to ensure enforcement.
EG.
Hagwon needs teacher.
Foreign recruiting company has teacher.
Hagwon sends money abroad.
Teacher gets on the plane.
Who is to know whether the foreigner was recruited by a foreigner or direct by the school?
In this day and age of instant communication, such a law (making foreign recruiters illegal) would be unenforcable.
Like I said...
"Another 1/2 baked idea, poorly thought out and no real idea of the implications or implimentation.
Stupidity at it's finest. "
Additionally, they can't enforce the laws they have on the books now in regards to taxes, medical, pension, and they still have a problem with tourists working in hakwons... what makes you think anything will really change with this. Enforcement will be non-existant.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Somehow I feel that the actual goal behind all of these new measures is to:
A. Control the flow of money in the industry
B. Attempt to kill the hagwons |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bellum99

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: don't need to know
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
As soon as they can kill the hakwons we can all be happy. The losers will go home and stop coming here and the lifers here will make huge money from teaching English because of high demand. I hope the Hakwons die screaming and all those lazy fat cheating owners will actually have to work for a living instead of screwing the parents and teachers out of money. Death to the schools and death to the owners!!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would think recruiters in Korea would be up in arms about this. Yeah I agree, recruiters outside Korea will have a field day with this.
There is no way to regulate recruiters given the fact some of them operate outside Korea. A bad idea from the beginning. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
One thing is for sure... future announcements coming from the MOJ should be very interesting! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Optimus Prime

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow. I can't believe the Hagwon Associations would take all this lying down. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Typhoon
Joined: 29 May 2007 Location: Daejeon
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am interested to see what happens and how many of these rumors turn out to be true. It does appear that a lot of these measures are meant to hurt hagwons (I like that part of it). I don't think too many hagwons will suffer, they will just go from doing some illegal actions to soing a lot illegal actions. Immigration offices will be too lazy to enforce the new laws and things will stay the same in all likelihood. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Boodleheimer

Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Location: working undercover for the Man
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
what about teachers who find their own replacements? would they be responsible for the successors? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roch
Joined: 24 Apr 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
bellum99 wrote: |
As soon as they can kill the hakwons we can all be happy. The losers will go home and stop coming here and the lifers here will make huge money from teaching English because of high demand. I hope the Hakwons die screaming and all those lazy fat cheating owners will actually have to work for a living instead of screwing the parents and teachers out of money. Death to the schools and death to the owners!!! :twisted: |
Bellum,
Remember Roch's police and spy agency connections before wishing bankruptcy upon the hogwons.
How's the wife and kid?
Cheers!
R
;) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|