View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 4:51 pm Post subject: What Caused The 9/11 Steel To Melt? |
|
|
The Truth is not 'out there', it is here, right here, in this article. Do you have the courage to read it?
"There are theories of exotic weaponry melting girders to dust and selectively melting vehicles in the vicinity of the fallen World Trade Center towers on 9/11. In this article I will describe how Aetheric Coronal Elements (ACE) did the damage. I do not believe ACE was used in the controlled demolition, but a large quantity was held in magnetic containment within the first tower that fell, and the destruction of the tower freed the ghost-like fire...
Two hundred years ago, Roman tombs were found to be lit by inextinguishable lamps taken from the temples of the gods in Egypt and Mesopotamia. ACE was the power source of the Anunnaki...
The simplest method to gather ACE is to construct a large Wilhelm Reich Orgone Accumulator of alternating gold foil and kiln dried wood. This would be a larger version of the Ark of The Covenant. No ferromagnetic metals should be used in the accumulator.
ACE is dangerous, as Spontaneous Human Combustion can happen. Its movements are unpredictable unless properly contained in a gold bottle. No magnetic fields should impinge on the bottle.
ACE is an aetheric, or fourth dimensional substance. It is nearly always in an ionized state and operating as a magnetic monopole. It is the higher dimensional equivalent of third dimensional iron, nickel and cobalt, the main ferromagnetic elements. ACE is a the portal through which fifth dimensional energy is transmitted into the fourth, and in turn into the third dimension. Iron itself transmits fourth dimensional power into the third dimension and makes it possible to construct electric dynamos. ACE is attracted to iron and in sharing the same space, the iron rapidly heats to the point where it melts and in melting, it looses its magnetism, releasing its hold on the hot aetheric ghost. Depending on the type of steel in the girders of the WTC, the girders could melt and bend, or loose all electron cohesion and fall to dust.
Wreckage of the towers remained hot for two weeks. It is likely most of the released ACE was in the tangled steel, and later followed drainage systems and pipes into the Hudson River, where it dispersed into the water creating a small rise in water temperature. One or two pieces of the ACE escaped the towers and caused all the damage to the vehicles as the steel (of the vehicles) attracted the ACE and then released the ACE at melting point. The ACE would have hopped from car to car causing the strange pattern of partial or entirely destroyed vehicles. The engines would have been especially attractive and there are reports of missing engines. The two pieces probably ended their trail of destruction in the East River. There may be damage done to the FDR elevated freeway as the rebar in the concrete could be dust now. There could be similar damage to the buildings in southern Manhattan.
It is likely the missing bodies of the 3000 who died were burned by ACE both at "ground-zero" and near the melted cars...
In ages where ACE was present on Earth, the elementals would have had a tool that would have made them more luminous and able to work into the physical. Gnomes and Dwarves deep underground are able to fashion marvellous crystals. Pixies and fairies would glow like fireflies, as they tended their plants and trees. Undines would illuminate the depths of the oceans. Sylphs would cause pleasant rain to fall on all parts of the Earth. The world of myth from before the Age of Iron would be reborn.
Read the whole article here: http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/causeof911steelmelt31mar07.shtml |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
twg

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What Caused The 9/11 Steel To Melt? |
Let the truth out! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gnomes, dwarves, pixies and fairies are the clincher, aren't they? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good question.
The world has long wanted to know.
Too bad the awful rubble wasn't kept around very long after this day of infamous orchestration.
A little more extensive & thorough CSI would likely have come in handy, IT being a major crime scene & all; where thousands of innocents were brutally sacrificed to some lesser unknown god
Apparently all was whisked out of the country for CHINA to melt down & dispose of etc ... etc  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
although the existance of molten metal is documented in the oral histories of 9/11, NIST denied its existence.
it only addressed the issue when its report got ripped to shreds by people seeking the truth.
so what does NIST have to say about the molten metal in the rubble-->
Quote: |
13. Why did the NIST investigation not consider reports of molten steel in the wreckage from the WTC towers?
NIST investigators and experts from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEONY)�who inspected the WTC steel at the WTC site and the salvage yards�found no evidence that would support the melting of steel in a jet-fuel ignited fire in the towers prior to collapse. The condition of the steel in the wreckage of the WTC towers (i.e., whether it was in a molten state or not) was irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse since it does not provide any conclusive information on the condition of the steel when the WTC towers were standing.
NIST considered the damage to the steel structure and its fireproofing caused by the aircraft impact and the subsequent fires when the buildings were still standing since that damage was responsible for initiating the collapse of the WTC towers.
Under certain circumstances it is conceivable for some of the steel in the wreckage to have melted after the buildings collapsed. Any molten steel in the wreckage was more likely due to the high temperature resulting from long exposure to combustion within the pile than to short exposure to fires or explosions while the buildings were standing. |
so fire does not melt steel when buildings are standing, but in certain circumstances, fire can melt steel in rubble piles?
do they care to elaberate? NO.
why? because they consider it 'irrelevant'.
plane + building = collapse
6 years later and this is still the only answer anyone can give.
a new investigation by an independant body is obviously needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
twg

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
loose_ends wrote: |
a new investigation by an independant body is obviously needed. |
I hear the Psychic Friends Network isn't up to much these days.
I was gonna suggest hiring the Scooby Gang, but I think they're busy with the case of the floating hands down in Louisiana. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
twg wrote: |
loose_ends wrote: |
a new investigation by an independant body is obviously needed. |
I hear the Psychic Friends Network isn't up to much these days.
I was gonna suggest hiring the Scooby Gang, but I think they're busy with the case of the floating hands down in Louisiana. |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
although the existance of molten metal is documented in the oral histories of 9/11, NIST denied its existence. |
So you do think the fairies had a hand in it... So do I. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
loose_ends wrote: |
Quote: |
Under certain circumstances it is conceivable for some of the steel in the wreckage to have melted after the buildings collapsed. Any molten steel in the wreckage was more likely due to the high temperature resulting from long exposure to combustion within the pile than to short exposure to fires or explosions while the buildings were standing. |
so fire does not melt steel when buildings are standing, but in certain circumstances, fire can melt steel in rubble piles?
do they care to elaberate? NO. |
Are there any experts that say this can't happen? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Are there any experts that say this can't happen?
|
The expert I quoted in the OP adequately supports the claim that AEC can melt steel whether it is standing on in a rubble heap.
The question is: What was so much AEC doing in the WTC at the time?
This can be explained: "Why would there be a large amount of ACE in the WTC? I believe research into ACE has been on-going since the discovery of inextinguishable lamps two centuries ago. Such a power source can be developed in a small facility in secret. Other than gold, research and development costs are low. The confiscation of gold from the American public in 1933 might indicate an important discovery regarding ACE before that year. Venture capitalists in the WTC may have been developing ACE as an alternative power source. Definitely the oil companies would see ACE as a threat to their hegemony. Maybe the developers of ACE felt safer in a large, important and imposing structure? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|