Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Another $200 Billion
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
No_hite_pls



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Location: Don't hate me because I'm right

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:14 pm    Post subject: Another $200 Billion Reply with quote

Another $200 Billion

New York Times

Published: October 25, 2007
President Bush waited until he had vetoed a relatively inexpensive children�s health insurance bill before asking for tens of billions of dollars more for his misadventure in Iraq. The cynicism of that maneuver is only slightly less shameful than the president�s distorted priorities. Despite a pretense of fiscal prudence, Mr. Bush keeps throwing money at his war, regardless of the cost in blood, treasure or children�s health care.

Mr. Bush is threatening to veto most of the 12 domestic spending bills now before Congress because Democrats want to provide $22 billion more than the $933 billion he has requested. His argument? Something about the president�s responsibility to rein in lawmakers� �temptation to overspend.�

This from a leader who turns federal surpluses into deficits, believes that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars can be financed on a separate set of books with borrowed money, and keeps having to go back to Congress for �emergency funding� because he cannot or will not tell the truth about what it is costing to fight these wars.

Mr. Bush�s latest emergency request is for $46 billion. That would bring the 2008 price tag for Iraq and Afghanistan to $196.4 billion. Starting at Sept. 11, 2001, war-fighting expenses total a staggering $800 billion or more. The nonpartisan Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments says that by the end of the year spending on Iraq will probably surpass that on the Vietnam War.

Mr. Bush has said most of the new money would go for �day-to-day� military operations and �basic needs� like bullets, body armor and mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles, which are designed to withstand bomb attacks, a rising threat to American forces in Iraq. The troops need safer vehicles and better armor, but it is beyond our ken why Mr. Bush could not cover this in his original budget submission, unless he wanted to confuse the public and limit Congressional oversight.

And there is no end in sight. Mr. Bush clearly plans to keep fighting this pointless war until his last day in office. The new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, told The Times that he will press Congress to sustain current military spending levels even after the Iraq war ends so the Pentagon can repair and replace worn-out weapons and rebuild ground forces.

The Pentagon will certainly need help recovering, but the country cannot keep signing blank checks. The next president, and Congress, will finally have to impose some discipline, starting with an honest review of what is needed to keep America safe, not just enrich military contractors and their lobbyists.

Democrats have failed repeatedly to end the Iraq war or to substantially change its course. Now they face another test. Mr. Bush will try to ram his spending request through Congress before Christmas, using the impending holiday to create a false sense of urgency. They must resist that, and try again to use their power of the purse to force the president to begin serious planning for a swift and orderly exit from Iraq. They cannot have it both ways � opposing the war and enabling Mr. Bush to keep it going full speed and full cost ahead.

If the Republicans block that, then the Democrats must at least insist on the fiscal prudence that Mr. Bush and his party claim to believe in so fervently. Representative David Obey, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, is already calling for a war tax. That, at least, would be a more honest and responsible way to ensure that all Americans share the financial burden of this war.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VanIslander



Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

200 billion this year?

that's more than $600 per American this year alone.

add to that the war's effects on oil prices and the attendant economic impact

it'd be a miracle if America didn't descend into a recession.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
loose_ends



Joined: 23 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
That, at least, would be a more honest and responsible way to ensure that all Americans share the financial burden of this war.


i say all the neocons and their accomplices have to pay for this out of their own pocket. and they all have to send their first sons to Irag's frontlines

i wonder if that would change their policies. fn b'sterds
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
No_hite_pls



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Location: Don't hate me because I'm right

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe that a Democrat President in 08 will be much better for the nation's economy and world reputation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

New York Times wrote:
Democrats have failed repeatedly to end the Iraq war or to substantially change its course.


No_hite_pls wrote:
I believe that a Democrat President in 08 will be much better for the nation's economy and world reputation.


The Democrats have capitulated to the current administration in every step of this quagmire, and have been the enablers of this war. Just a couple of weeks ago they had the chance to cut off war funding and refused.

Had Gore been president instead of Bush, we still would have gone to war in Iraq. he made a speech in the February before that election in which he demonized Saddam as bad as or worse than Bush or anyone else. It is clear for what he was preparing us.

The plans for this war were nothing new and have been made through several presidencies, both Democrat and Republican.

Jimmy Carter's National Securioty Advisor, and under Ronald Reagan - member of NSC-Defense Department Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy, Zbigniew Brzezinski, wrote in his 1998 book The Grand Chessboard:

"Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power."- (p. xiii)

"... But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book.� (p. xiv)

"In that context, how America 'manages' Eurasia is critical. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent. About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for about three-fourths of the world's known energy resources." (p.31)

�Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization." (p.35)

�The momentum of Asia's economic development is already generating massive pressures for the exploration and exploitation of new sources of energy and the Central Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea." (p.125)

"In the long run, global politics are bound to become increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic power in the hands of a single state. Hence, America is not only the first, as well as the only, truly global superpower, but it is also likely to be the very last." (p.209)

"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (p. 211)

9/11, how convenient!

As Ralph Nader said, Democrats and Republicans are just two wings of the same party. Nothing will change until we, the people, demand it from ALL those in power. Resist. Be bold. Question authority. Think for yourself. Demand accountability. Demonstrate (while we still can).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
No_hite_pls



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Location: Don't hate me because I'm right

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now, I won't disagree that there are problems with the special interests with both parties but there are some differences. One party actually wants unverisal health care! That's a pretty big change I think. Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No_hite_pls wrote:
Now, I won't disagree that there are problems with the special interests with both parties but there are some differences.

One party actually wants unverisal health care! That's a pretty big change I think. Shocked


For Christ's sake, Hite. Wake Up!

Don't be afraid, my good man, to open your eyes a little more & see what's actually being done to the good ol' US of A.

Compared to what the 4th REICH Bush/"New-Con" White House is EXTORTING from AmeriKan tax-payers,
universal health care would be a TOTAL drop in the bucket.

Peanuts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Compared to what the 4th REICH Bush/"New-Con" White House is EXTORTING from AmeriKan tax-payers,
universal health care would be a TOTAL drop in the bucket.


A follower of Jeff Resne who likes Nazis compares the US to the Nazis.

Rolling Eyes

Jeff Rense is a fascist bigot just like his followers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
No_hite_pls



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Location: Don't hate me because I'm right

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't really care that much about the war. I don't like that we were lied to about the reasons for going but
I do understand (a little) the reasons why we are there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be fair, the GOP and Bush will approve SCHIP. They were opposing its expansion. Most of the ~$45billion will go to children's health care under a revised bill. Pelosi wanted to expand the program, but it looks like she'll easily get the program if she leaves it as is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
No_hite_pls



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Location: Don't hate me because I'm right

PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
To be fair, the GOP and Bush will approve SCHIP. They were opposing its expansion. Most of the ~$45billion will go to children's health care under a revised bill. Pelosi wanted to expand the program, but it looks like she'll easily get the program if she leaves it as is.


Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, said, �It�s ironic that in the very same week that the president says he�s going to veto the bill because we can�t afford it, he is asking, what, for $45 billion more over and above his initial request for the war in Iraq, money that we know is being spent without accountability, without a plan for how we can leave Iraq.�
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, said, �This is all a matter of priorities: the cost of Iraq, $333 million a day; the cost of Schip, $19 million a day.�

The campaign for the legislation will also include grass-roots advocacy and political advertisements, and will initially focus on about 15 House Republicans who voted against the bill. Supporters of the legislation hope to persuade them to switch.

But House Republican leaders said they felt sure they could sustain the veto, and two lawmakers on the Democrats� list said that they would support Mr. Bush.

The bill passed this week by the House and the Senate would provide $60 billion for the program over the next five years, up $35 billion from the current level of spending. On Wednesday, the administration said it would seek $42 billion more for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, bringing its total request to nearly $190 billion for the 2008 fiscal year, which begins Monday.

from the New York Times
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

21st Century Crusaders Twisted Evil

Blackwater: Knights of Malta in Iraq

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Hospitaller

http://www.redicecreations.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1427&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
No_hite_pls



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Location: Don't hate me because I'm right

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No_hite_pls wrote:
Now, I won't disagree that there are problems with the special interests with both parties but there are some differences. One party actually wants to fix the health care system! That's a pretty big change I think. Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TexasPete



Joined: 24 May 2006
Location: Koreatown

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya know...i can't help but wonder what $800,000,000,000 could have actually gotten the American people. A solid gold bridge across the Bering Straight? A diamond studded transcontinental highway? A cure for everything?

Instead, $800,000,000,000 has gotten us 4,000 flag-draped coffins; countless dead Iraqis; a quagmire we can't extract ourselves from; a dollar sinking like the Titanic; failing infrastructure nationwide; less security; diminished international prestige, cooperation and standing; the surreal debate on water boarding; thousands of Katrina affected families living in formaldehyde soaked trailers that FEMA employees themselves are not allowed into....and the list goes on.

How can anyone defend this A$$HOLE or his administration? And people do. When will enough be enough? Oh well...at least I haven't paid any taxes funding this crap what with being here for the past 3 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question:

What did these elite criminal bastards do with the $2.3 TRILLION it was confirmed they'd pilfered from public coffers on the eve of 9/11?

Many other "less memorable" examples can be found as well.

Anyone read the book 4th Reich Economics?

We Will Never Forget.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International