|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Yesterday

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Land of the Morning DongChim (Kancho)
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:43 am Post subject: China Navy beats (wins against) USA navy.... |
|
|
funny...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=492804&in_page_id=1811
When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.
At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.
That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.
American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.
By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier.
According to senior Nato officials the incident caused consternation in the U.S. Navy.
The Americans had no idea China's fast-growing submarine fleet had reached such a level of sophistication, or that it posed such a threat.
One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age.
The incident, which took place in the ocean between southern Japan and Taiwan, is a major embarrassment for the Pentagon.
The lone Chinese vessel slipped past at least a dozen other American warships which were supposed to protect the carrier from hostile aircraft or submarines.
And the rest of the costly defensive screen, which usually includes at least two U.S. submarines, was also apparently unable to detect it.
According to the Nato source, the encounter has forced a serious re-think of American and Nato naval strategy as commanders reconsider the level of threat from potentially hostile Chinese submarines.
It also led to tense diplomatic exchanges, with shaken American diplomats demanding to know why the submarine was "shadowing" the U.S. fleet while Beijing pleaded ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidence.
Analysts believe Beijing was sending a message to America and the West demonstrating its rapidly-growing military capability to threaten foreign powers which try to interfere in its "backyard".
The People's Liberation Army Navy's submarine fleet includes at least two nuclear-missile launching vessels.
Its 13 Song Class submarines are extremely quiet and difficult to detect when running on electric motors.
Commodore Stephen Saunders, editor of Jane's Fighting Ships, and a former Royal Navy anti-submarine specialist, said the U.S. had paid relatively little attention to this form of warfare since the end of the Cold War.
He said: "It was certainly a wake-up call for the Americans.
"It would tie in with what we see the Chinese trying to do, which appears to be to deter the Americans from interfering or operating in their backyard, particularly in relation to Taiwan."
In January China carried a successful missile test, shooting down a satellite in orbit for the first time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tony_Balony

Joined: 12 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yea, thats a good story. The Cole was taken out by a Zodiac. A few years ago Indian and US planes had a mock battle, the Indians won 95% of the time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cangel

Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: Jeonju, S. Korea
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
No layman knows more about the military than good old Tom Clancy. He's addressed this topic in a few of his non-fiction books. Often when conducting war games with other countries, the US Navy and it's subs will often use noise emmiters to level the field. Not saying this is the case in any of the above mentioned situations, but just a possibility. Secondly, a sub, even a noisy diesel sub, could sit undetected on the sea floor and then make a surprise surfacing. Not much one can do about that. However, I highly doubt in a real war situation, the Navy would not be sonar mapping the sea floor when moving into hostile areas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Article has some misleading information.
First off, the USS Kitty Hawk is a 1950's/1960's era Aircraft carrier. That carrier and its strike group are very old and NOT representative of current US naval superiority (aka Nimitz and Ford class Super Carriers). In fact, the Kitty Hawk is the last of its breed. The rest of that line of carriers have been decommissioned.
Despite China's military advances, they are still decades away from the US's military technology. What point is having a large military when your enemy can hit you harder, faster, and from further away? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
merkurix
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Location: Not far from the deep end.
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
pkang0202 wrote: |
Article has some misleading information.
First off, the USS Kitty Hawk is a 1950's/1960's era Aircraft carrier. That carrier and its strike group are very old and NOT representative of current US naval superiority (aka Nimitz and Ford class Super Carriers). In fact, the Kitty Hawk is the last of its breed. The rest of that line of carriers have been decommissioned.
Despite China's military advances, they are still decades away from the US's military technology. What point is having a large military when your enemy can hit you harder, faster, and from further away? |
Yes, but it wasn't the sole responsibility of Kitty Hawk personnel to detect intruders. Granted if the Kitty Hawk is an old piece, I'd like to think that its guardian warship fleet are at the pinnacle of technological sophistication at the very least. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
According to my friends in the service, the Kitty Hawk is better known by its name City Hawk, as pronounced by the Chinese guy on South Park. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SeoulFinn

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 Location: 1h from Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This was done on purpose. They knew where the sub was the moment it left the shipyard. Now the NAVY can ask more funding to be prepared for this new threat. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|