| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:48 pm Post subject: CNN goes soft on Clinton during debate |
 |
|
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312003,00.html
| Quote: |
Maria Parra-Sandoval, 22, a senior political science major at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said she wanted to ask the Democratic frontrunner where she stood on the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear repository in Nevada, an issue about which she said she wrote a paper as a finalist for a Truman Scholarship.
Instead, she said, CNN's Suzanne Malveaux told her right before the end of the debate to go with the following question:
"This is a fun question for you. Do you prefer diamonds or pearls?" |
The interesting thing about all of this is that, to win, Clinton would have to woo away Republican voters. She cannot. She (and her husband) are far too polarizing.
The Democrats can't win with Clinton. They would need to choose somebody else. There are powerful Democrats who back the Clinton legacy, and they are in control of Democrats, so someone who can actually beat a Republican candidate won't be chosen as the Democratic candidate.
Look for another 4 years of Republican rule. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:05 pm Post subject: Re: CNN goes soft on Clinton during debate |
|
|
| bassexpander wrote: |
| The Democrats can't win with Clinton. |
How soon we forget. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Look for another 4 years of Republican rule.
|
Is this the result of careful analysis or wishful thinking? Inquiring minds want to know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Funkdafied
Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Location: In Da House
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The Democrats can't win with Clinton. |
Care to make a small wager? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Roch
Joined: 24 Apr 2003
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Quote: |
Look for another 4 years of Republican rule.
|
Is this the result of careful analysis or wishful thinking? Inquiring minds want to know. |
What is the C.B.C.'s take on this, eh?
Roch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Great Wall of Whiner
Joined: 24 Jan 2003
Location: Middle Land
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok.
CNN goes soft on Clinton.
FOX goes hard on Clinton.
CNN goes hard on Rudy.
FOX goes hard on Arizona Boy
So...? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hillary Clinton who is a loser and unelectible.
vs.
Rudy Giuliani who is a loser and unelectible.
After Bush, the Republicans shouldn't be able to win.
After failing to counter Bush, even after their 2006 victories, the Democrats shouldn't be able to win.
shhh, Don't tell anyone, but maybe, just maybe this is why millions of people are looking for an alternative ... for a change ... for real leadership ... for a candidate with principles, who believes in liberty and the constitution ...
shhh ... it's a secret ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
twg
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ontheway wrote: |
| shhh, Don't tell anyone, but maybe, just maybe this is why millions of people are looking for an alternative ... for a change ... for real leadership ... for a candidate with principles, who believes in liberty and the constitution ... |
COME BACK TO US, ROSS PEROT! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
She (and her husband) are far too polarizing.
|
Has anyone ever read anything that explains why they (but right now I'm more interested in Senator Clinton) are and always have been so polarizing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catman
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ontheway wrote: |
Hillary Clinton who is a loser and unelectible.
vs.
Rudy Giuliani who is a loser and unelectible.
After Bush, the Republicans shouldn't be able to win.
After failing to counter Bush, even after their 2006 victories, the Democrats shouldn't be able to win.
shhh, Don't tell anyone, but maybe, just maybe this is why millions of people are looking for an alternative ... for a change ... for real leadership ... for a candidate with principles, who believes in liberty and the constitution ...
shhh ... it's a secret ... |
Should also add that Hillary is Pro-War. That's why I pray that Nader runs or Kucinich goes Independent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keane
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kucinich/Paul '08! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Harpeau
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Location: Coquitlam, BC
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| keane wrote: |
| Kucinich/Paul '08! |
More likely:
Paul/Kucinich '08!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| catman wrote: |
| ontheway wrote: |
Hillary Clinton who is a loser and unelectible.
vs.
Rudy Giuliani who is a loser and unelectible.
After Bush, the Republicans shouldn't be able to win.
After failing to counter Bush, even after their 2006 victories, the Democrats shouldn't be able to win.
shhh, Don't tell anyone, but maybe, just maybe this is why millions of people are looking for an alternative ... for a change ... for real leadership ... for a candidate with principles, who believes in liberty and the constitution ...
shhh ... it's a secret ... |
Should also add that Hillary is Pro-War. That's why I pray that Nader runs or Kucinich goes Independent. |
No, she's not. She waffles back and forth on it, depending on what audience she needs votes from at the time.
I feel it's time for a Democrat in the white house. Just not a Clinton. I'm not impressed with Osama Obama, either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
