Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

the "marionette" debate, rudy, fred and...

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dutchy pink



Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Location: Incheon

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:53 am    Post subject: the "marionette" debate, rudy, fred and... Reply with quote

My God. Could you actually vote for any of these people?

If I was forced at gunpoint, I would vote for Romney or R. Paul.

But, if the gun was in my hand, I shoot myself first.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pluto



Joined: 19 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This begs the question:

What type of leadership do you support?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pluto wrote:
This begs the question:

What type of leadership do you support?


How exactly does it "beg" the question? Cool

Shill puppets indeed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
But, if the gun was in my hand, I shoot myself first.


Very Happy

In my opinion, having RP as president would be a fate worse than death.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Funkdafied



Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Location: In Da House

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well Im a liberal who happens to think that Ron Paul would be the best thing to happen to america sinse, oh, the writing of the constitution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How can you support a "libertarian" that is anti-abortion? I suppose that's why he's a Republican, but still...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Czarjorge wrote:
How can you support a "libertarian" that is anti-abortion? I suppose that's why he's a Republican, but still...


Again we see your inability to understand opinions that you have not encountered yet.

Ron Paul believes that the fetus is a human life. Ron Paul believes that humans have the right not to be killed. Ergo, Ron Paul does not support abortion.

I disagree with him, but I respect his position.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read before you respond.

Ron Paul is entitled to his opinion, but it is the antithesis of libertarianism to think that one person's opinion, ie: fetus' are living humans and deserve the right to life, should trump another, especially in regards to the governments role of regulating that opinion.

I suppose, just read period. Learning is fun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ernie



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Location: asdfghjk

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

most people who criticize the libertarian anti-abortion position don't really understand the argument, which is:
1. people have the right to live without interference from others, within reason
2. killing someone is an unreasonable infringement upon someone's life
3. a fetus is a person
4. therefore, killing a fetus is wrong

how does this contradict libertarian principles? a libertarian can disagree with this argument by saying that the fetus isn't really a person, but that doesn't mean that the other guy isn't a libertarian!

anti-abortionists are not saying that the life of the fetus trumps the life of the mother, rather that both are human lives, and deserve protection under the law!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funkdafied wrote:
Well Im a liberal who happens to think that Ron Paul would be the best thing to happen to america sinse, oh, the writing of the constitution.


i&i - screw the phony left-right nonsense, it's too hyped & dishonest; let one instead always vote with their conscience.

As i see it RON PAUL's "3rd way" clearly offers a healthy & viable package for a genuine alternative course in better shaping America's future.

Either way, you can hardly go wrong with widespread "populist" appeal Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ernie wrote:
most people who criticize the libertarian anti-abortion position don't really understand the argument, which is:
1. people have the right to live without interference from others, within reason
2. killing someone is an unreasonable infringement upon someone's life
3. a fetus is a person
4. therefore, killing a fetus is wrong

how does this contradict libertarian principles? a libertarian can disagree with this argument by saying that the fetus isn't really a person, but that doesn't mean that the other guy isn't a libertarian!

anti-abortionists are not saying that the life of the fetus trumps the life of the mother, rather that both are human lives, and deserve protection under the law!


I disagree. I am fairly libertarian in my political views, and I don't see how regulating another person's body, which is what anti-abortion legislation is all about, can jive with libertarian ideals. The anti-abortion position you've illustrated isn't the libertarian anti-abortion position, it's just the anti-abortion position. You have every right to personally be anti-abortion, but you have no right to force that view on others.

I am personally anti-abortion, due primarily to a little falling out I had with a girlfriend in college, but as much as you could argue that a fetus is a living human with rights the opposite argument, that a fetus is a parasite and plucking it out is not different than removing a tick or leech. The argument is not a politcal one, it's a moral one, and libertarians should not want to legislate morality.

The courts have decided this issue. It should be left at that. In a libertarian democracy the courts would theoretically be the only regulatory body with any teeth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International