|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:55 pm Post subject: IRANIAN NAVY PROVOCATION: IS IT TIME TO CALL THEIR BLUFF? |
|
|
Not content with their kidnapping of British seamen and previous maneuvers outside their territorial waters, the Iran Revolutionary Guard Navy has once again engaged in reckless tactics against U.S. Navy vessels in the Straits of Hormuz.
See this weblink:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080108/D8U1UNM80.html
Of course, had the roles been reversed there would have been a huge outcry from the Gulf States and indeed most of the U.N. nations. But once again the Iranians get a pass. Apparently unprovoked aggression on their part is excusable if not entirely justified.
Which begs the question: When is enough really going to be enough? Sure their boats almost got blown to Kingdom Come but only after broadcast threats, the dropping of unidentified boxes into the water, and buzzing between our vessels.
I say it's time to call their bluff and next time blow them to smithereens at the outset, especially since Bush and his admirals in the region have made it abudantly clear that it was an unwarranted display of aggression. One must wonder what motivated this false show of bravado. Partly it's the renegade nature of the Revolutionary Guard, which doesn't receive all its orders from Tehran or, if it does, acts on its own behalf. It might be they want to test our preparedness and response time to such attacks for future strategic planning. Or perhaps Ahmadine-jihad just got a hard-on trying to divert attention away from his impotent domestic policies.
Meanwhile, the Iranian Foreign Ministry continues to downplay the incident, to deny that its boats recognized the American vessels (yeah, like they'd be hard to spot on such a clear day in a narrow strait routinely traversed).
So should we call their bluff and if not, why not? What do we stand to gain and lose?
What do you suppose has stirred this latest provocation? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Iran will always cause trouble but the US ought to play it quiet with Iran unless Iran really goes over the line. Iran loses nothing in a low level conflict with the US.
The best way and the most successful way to deal with Iran is alternative energy R&D and military R&D. That will eventually set the balance in the US favor. That isn't doing nothing.
Plus the US really doesn't know what kind of nation Iran will be in 15 years. Iran's supreme leader is a pretty horrible guy kind of like an Iranian Lenin but after him who knows?
The US needs to focus on the long term strategic situation and not get side tracked. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The US needs to focus on the long term strategic situation and not get side tracked. |
Here! here!
DD
PS>McGarette, you really believe, don't you?! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't be surprised at all if the current administration initiates some sort of action against Iran before they're out of office. I'm sure they reason that if they start a fight the Iranians will make sure it doesn't end. I also think the neocons will expect that the electorate will go for a Rep over a Dem if more conflict is initiated.
Both are these are reason enough NOT to pick a fight with Iran. None of us have any say in the matter though. I think Bush and his power brokers have watched one too many episodes of 24. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
Iran will always cause trouble but the US ought to play it quiet with Iran unless Iran really goes over the line. Iran loses nothing in a low level conflict with the US.
The best way and the most successful way to deal with Iran is alternative energy R&D and military R&D. That will eventually set the balance in the US favor. That isn't doing nothing.
Plus the US really doesn't know what kind of nation Iran will be in 15 years. Iran's supreme leader is a pretty horrible guy kind of like an Iranian Lenin but after him who knows?
The US needs to focus on the long term strategic situation and not get side tracked. |
Agreed. Iran is baiting them.
Sure, we'd like to see the fly smacked... but I'm guessing that'll play into their hands. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
W.T.Carl
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, what fun; hunting speed boats with a Destroyer. Sound like good fun! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you heard the audio? They've been playing it on the big news channels. (MSNBC/CNN/FOX) I'm not sure these guys are Iranian government. It seems like it's the Iranian version of rednecks messing with a US ship. Wouldn't our rednecks in cigar boats buzz a foreign military if they were hanging off the coast of Texas or Florida? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Corea:
O.K., so let's suppose they're baiting us. To what end, then?
Jorge:
Let me see if I understand you correctly: you're saying that we shouldn't retaliate because Bush will use this as an excuse for war? Assuming that your sentiment is shared by the Iranians, why would they want to instigate a war? What do they stand to gain, in your view?
Joo:
I hear what you're saying but I don't see the ayatollahs falling out of favor anytime in the foreseeable future. I see the chance that Ahmadine-jihad might be oustered for once again imprudently instigating an incident. Which makes me wonder how much influence he has on the Guard Navy which has taken renegade actions before.
W.T.:
As you must know, a few bursts trained on them from those 5-inch guns would make short work of those boats. BTW, were those Spruance-class destroyers? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemcgarrett wrote: |
Jorge:
Let me see if I understand you correctly: you're saying that we shouldn't retaliate because Bush will use this as an excuse for war? Assuming that your sentiment is shared by the Iranians, why would they want to instigate a war? What do they stand to gain, in your view?
|
We should retaliate if directly assaulted, and we will. My point was, the current administration WANTS a conflict with Iran. They may attempt to create a situation that accomodates that desire. I don't think the Iranians want to instigate a war. I do think SOME Iranians want to instigate a war, just as SOME US citizens want to instigate a war. And given the audio are the boats Iranian government boats?
In terms of what Iran would gain, I'm not sure. They might think it will raise their stature in the world. It might give them the justification to attempt to unite Sunni and Shia under the single cause of kill America. Given that they essentially have a terrorist organization as an arm of their military they might try to argue that an assault against them could legally allow terrorists in their employ to strike the US. They might think it would sway Pakistan away from the US, possibly allowing Iran to finish a nuke or four.
Any way it rolls out, a conflict with Iran is a bad idea, and would be even if the Iraqi war didn't have our military stretched to its limit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
In terms of what Iran would gain, I'm not sure. They might think it will raise their stature in the world. It might give them the justification to attempt to unite Sunni and Shia under the single cause of kill America. |
"Attempt" being the operative word there. If it were possible to unite Sunni and Shia under the common banner of anti-Americanism, I think it would have happened a long time ago. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pluto
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
This story has taken a new turn. Iran is now complaining that the Pentagon fabricated the footage. /sigh...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080109/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_us_navy
Anyway, I agree more with Joo. That dinner-jacket guy keeps making himself look more foolish everyday, both inside and outside of Iran. So per haps he'll get voted out. At any rate, Iran is a Democratic Islamic Theocracy. No matter who's in charge, the last word remains with the Ayatollahs, and the Ayatollahs still command much power and influence in Iran. This may change, however, because more than 70% of Iran's population is under 30 years old.
So, who knows? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
W.T.Carl
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
The first was an Aegis class cruiser, followed by a Spruance class destoyer and then a frigate of which I am not too sure which class.
Yes, it would not have been a "sporting" contest. However, if the Iranians wish to commit suicide I think we should oblige them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Czarjorge wrote: |
In terms of what Iran would gain, I'm not sure. They might think it will raise their stature in the world. It might give them the justification to attempt to unite Sunni and Shia under the single cause of kill America. Given that they essentially have a terrorist organization as an arm of their military they might try to argue that an assault against them could legally allow terrorists in their employ to strike the US. They might think it would sway Pakistan away from the US, possibly allowing Iran to finish a nuke or four. |
I'm still missing the logic.
Why would they care to strike the USA in any form? Why would they want terrorists to strike the US? Why would they engage in this act to do so? Iran allowed terrorist groups it supported to hit US interests before, so why would they now need to take this extra step?
Why would it sway Pakistan away from the US? Musharraf might be a creep but he's not dumb. W/out American aid, he'd be gone. He knows that and the Iranian gov't knows it. Iran has already had dealings with the Pakistani nuclear guru Kahn anyway (what rogue nation hasn't?).
If this really is the iranian military, then I'd wager it is domestic politics at play here. One faction working against another. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With the recent release of the report that reduced tensions, it would seem to me that elements within the Revolutionary Guards are upset and want to raise them again. After all, combating the Great Satan is their reason in life.
The US should play it very carefully. Iran is deeply divided and its economy is in a shambles. With a skillful patient policy, we can wait out the life-expectancy of an unpopular regime and quite possibly end up with a much friendlier government a few years down the road. Since that is our ultimate goal, we need to be especially cautious of hot heads (on both sides) triggering an unnecessary conflict.
The smart thing to do would be for us to publically and formally suggest a commission be set up to study ways incidents like this can be avoided in the future. It would flummox the suicide by cop elements in the Iranian government. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
OTOH noted of Jorge:
Quote: |
"Attempt" being the operative word there. If it were possible to unite Sunni and Shia under the common banner of anti-Americanism, I think it would have happened a long time ago. |
Yes, indeed, but Jorge has a tale to weave.
Jorge reminded:
Quote: |
My point was, the current administration WANTS a conflict with Iran |
Yeah, I got that part. So if Bush is so hell-bent on war with Iran why didn't he use the capture of Iranian Qud advisors inside Iraq a while back as his pretext? And do you really think he believes the Congress would provide him with the authorization or that the Republicans presidential candidates wouldn't resent having to defend another war on the campaign trail? C'mon, dude, let's get real here.
Pluto:
Yeah, it's incredible, isn't it? Iranian arrogance knows no bounds, or is it just another attempt to manipulate world public opinion through the media? Either way, they come across as bungling along. Maybe Vladimir can send them a few subs?
W.T. Carl clarified:
Quote: |
The first was an Aegis class cruiser, followed by a Spruance class destoyer and then a frigate of which I am not too sure which class.
Yes, it would not have been a "sporting" contest. However, if the Iranians wish to commit suicide I think we should oblige them. |
It's the frigate that I'm not sure about either. But then McGarrett hasn't had his sea legs for a long time.
I concur on your point, by the way. Only I think "suicide" is a little harsh in this euphemistic age we live in. Let's just call it "state-sponsored euthanasia."  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|