| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:36 pm Post subject: Fool Me Thrice |
 |
|
| Quote: |
It should be no surprise that the Clintons are playing the race card.
By Christopher Hitchens
How can one equal Bill Clinton for thuggery and opportunism when it comes to the so-called "race card"? And where does one even start with the breathtaking nastiness of his own conduct, and that of his supporters, in the last week? Barack Obama carries South Carolina having made no sectarian appeal to any specific kind of voter, and the best Clinton can say is that this is no better than Jesse Jackson managed to do. Really? Did Jackson come south having already got himself elected the senator from Illinois? And, come to think of it, was Jackson so much to be despised and sneered at when he was needed as Clinton's "confessor," along with Billy Graham, during the squalor of impeachment?
This calculated willingness to shop on both sides of the street of racial politics was actually analyzed quite shrewdly by Dick Morris, the former consigliere of the gruesome twosome, in conversation with Sean Hannity last week. The Clintons, he thought, would be quite happy to lose big to the "black vote" in South Carolina. It would enable them to signal that they were the ones to stem the flow of the color tide. Morris' host protested that this seemed a touch cynical. Morris jovially assured him that he knew the people he was talking about.
As indeed he did. It was Hillary Clinton who insisted on recalling Morris to the embattled White House, notwithstanding his various disgraces and notwithstanding the fact that he had been the adviser and strategist for Jesse Helms of North Carolina. Why am I saying "notwithstanding"? It was because he had performed so well for Helms, including helping him with the famous "white hands" ad that showed a white man crumpling up a letter that told him of preference for "minorities" in hiring, that Morris was thought of by the then-first lady as such a guru.
I never quite understand how the Clintons' initial exploitation of racism was overlooked the first time around and has been airbrushed from the record since. After falling behind in the New Hampshire primary in 1992, and after being caught lying about the affair with Gennifer Flowers to which he later confessed under oath, Clinton left the campaign trail and flew home to Arkansas to give the maximum publicity to his decision to sign a death warrant for Ricky Ray Rector. Rector was a black inmate on death row who had shot himself in the head after committing a double murder and, instead of dying as a result, had achieved the same effect as a lobotomy would have done. He never understood the charge against him or the sentence. After being served his last meal, he left the pecan pie on the side of the tray, as he told the guards who came to take him to the execution chamber, "for later." Several police and prison-officer witnesses expressed extreme queasiness at this execution of a gravely impaired man, and the prison chaplain, Dennis Pigman, later resigned from the prison service. The whole dismal and cruel and pathetic story was told by Marshall Frady in a long essay in The New Yorker in 1993 and is also recounted in a chapter titled "Chameleon in Black and White" by your humble servant in his book No One Left To Lie To. For now, I just ask you to imagine what would have been said if a Republican governor, falling in the polls, had gone out of his way to execute a mentally incompetent African-American prisoner.
Or leaf back, if you will, to the New York Times of March 23, 1992, and the jolly headline, "Club Where Clinton Has Golfed Retains Ways of Old South." Yes indeedy, the Country Club of Little Rock had 500 members, all of them white, and the aspirant candidate had himself photographed there more than once until Jerry Brown made an issue of it. It was then announced by Clinton's people that "the staff and facilities" at the club were "integrated"�a pretty way of stating that the toilets were cleaned by black Arkansans. Yet all this was forgiven by credulous liberals who were sure that they had discovered a New Democrat who was a Southerner to boot.
Many of these same people do not like it now that they see similar two-faced tactics being employed against "one of their own." Well, tough. And many of the most prominent and eloquent black columnists�Bob Herbert, Colbert King, Eugene Robinson�are also acting shocked. It's a bit late. I have to say that Bob Herbert shocked even me by quoting Andrew Young, who said that his pal Clinton was "every bit as black as Barack" because he'd screwed more black chicks. How is Hillary Clinton, or Chelsea Clinton, supposed to feel on hearing that little endorsement? One gets the impression, though, at least from the wife, that anything is OK as long as it works, or even has a chance of working. When Toni Morrison described Clinton as "black" on the basis of his promiscuity and dysfunction and uncertainty about his parentage, she did more than cater to the white racist impression of the African-American male. She tapped into the sort of self-hatred that is evidently more common than we might choose to think. Say what you will about Sen. Obama (and I say that he's got much more charisma than guts), he is miles above this sort of squalor and has decent manners. Say what you will about the Clintons, you cannot acquit them of having played the race card several times in both directions and of having done so in the most vulgar and unscrupulous fashion. Anyone who thinks that this equals "change" is a fool, and an easily fooled fool at that. |
http://www.slate.com/id/2182938 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hitchens = hack
'nuff said |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| How can one equal Bill Clinton for thuggery and opportunism when it comes to the so-called "race card"? |
Easy. You look at any Republican starting with Richard Nixon and his Southern Strategy; you could look at Reagan starting his bid for the presidency in Selma, Alabama with his talk of States Rights (code words for 'race card'); you could look at Daddy Bush and his Willie Horton ad. It's really not hard if you put out even minimal effort. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| An ad homonym and a "know you are but what am I" as the first two. By chance, you two aren't Clinton supporters? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thepeel wrote: |
| An ad homonym and a "know you are but what am I" as the first two. By chance, you two aren't Clinton supporters? |
The article itself is an ad homonym.
That's all Hitchens does! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You both are indicted for moral failure for your abuses against Latin: ad ho�mi�nem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Justin Hale
Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Location: the Straight Talk Express
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the context of politics, ad hominem is very common and quite justified. Well done once again, Mr Hitchens!
Obama v McCain |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anyways, I didn't post it to have a discussion about Hitchens. I'm more concerned about how polarizing and divisive a Clinton campaign would be and how the Rupubs must be licking their lips at the thought of a Clinton nomination. I'd really like a few years of no new wars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
Hitchens = hack
'nuff said |
I posted it at 6:36 and you responded at 6:38. Unless you clicked it exactly at the time I posted it (which was exactly at 6:36) and replied at the last second of 6:38, you had less than 2 minutes to read a 972 word piece. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It only took me the first sentence to know it was an intellectually corrupt hatchet job. I didn't read any further.
| Quote: |
| I'm more concerned about how polarizing and divisive a Clinton campaign would be and how the Rupubs must be licking their lips at the thought of a Clinton nomination. I'd really like a few years of no new wars. |
How are those two sentences connected? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| In one week, we'll see if the general public is as turned off by the Clintons as more and more commentators in the media are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
Hitchens = hack
'nuff said |
Funny I am a fan of both Bill Clinton and Christopher Hitchens.
I will stay neutral here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thepeel wrote: |
| Kuros wrote: |
Hitchens = hack
'nuff said |
I posted it at 6:36 and you responded at 6:38. Unless you clicked it exactly at the time I posted it (which was exactly at 6:36) and replied at the last second of 6:38, you had less than 2 minutes to read a 972 word piece. |
I read the bolded part.
Yes, I'm a Hillary fan, but I've been vocal about what I think about Hitchens for some time now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Have you read any of his books? I think he is an excellent critic. He has no sacred cows and admits when wrong. I respect that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thepeel wrote: |
| Have you read any of his books? I think he is an excellent critic. He has no sacred cows and admits when wrong. I respect that. |
No, but I have read dozens of his articles through Slate. I've seen him on interviews. He's more of a polemicist than a critic (the difference? sometimes a critic says good things, because a critic is doing an analysis).
I also read his column on Obama. I thought it was pretty crap, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
