| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:52 pm Post subject: The Four Horsemen |
|
|
Here is a set of interviews with Chris Hitchens, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkings and Daniel Dennet. Titled The Four Horsemen, it is the 4 leading infidels in the West today. It is an excellent, couple of videos. 2 hours in duration.
http://www.buildupthatwall.com/nv139.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| oooh nice. I love listening to Dawkins and Hitchens speak. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
| oooh nice. I love listening to Dawkins speak. |
Especially when he stutters, unable to answer a simple question
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g&feature=related
Dorkins has an easier time brainwashing his poor group of 10 year olds.
Hahahahahahaha  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, the flawed human couldn't answer a question. His whole body of work is therefor invalidated.
Which books of his have you read?
You religious types will cling to anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thepeel wrote: |
| Yes, the flawed human couldn't answer a question. |
You and I both know he should have been able to answer it easily, if evolution were true.
But of course it isn't..so there could be no answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pluto
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't believe the cheesy Madrile�o accent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The_Eyeball_Kid

Joined: 20 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ha! That's funny that you're trying to use that. It's already been shown that that was not the actual question that was asked in that interview, and was dubbed on afterwards.
Do get some sort of thrill out of being called a moron or something? Is it like a sick masochistic sexual thing for you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Hale

Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Location: the Straight Talk Express
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've always regarded that vid as suspicious, because the question the woman supposedly asks has a straightforward answer highly unlikely to stump an Oxford professor if a guy (me) who peddles TEFL for a living can answer it.
Physical characteristics can be (and are) influenced and passed on in response to environmental adaptation. Straightforward example: the way melanin in skin typically responds to ultraviolet radiation. Humans probably evolved in the tropics, where they were exposed to high UV levels. The majority of dark pigmented people live within 20� of the equator. Most of the lighter pigmented people live in the northern hemisphere north of 20� latitude (northern Europe is 50-60�). One of the reasons Eskimos are dark (unlike northern Europeans) is that they have not lived in the region very long. More importantly, their traditional diet is rich in fish and other seafood, high in vitamin D, the "sunshine vitamin", so they haven't undergone the same reduction in pigmentation that would otherwise occur at such high latitudes. There. Increased information in the genome example. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ED209
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dawkins didn't know the program makers were creationists when she asked the question it dawned on him he was duped. He realised that he was being used and found he couldn't come with an answer or continue to speak without feeling his word would be quoted out of context.
From origins
| Quote: |
Claim CB102.1:
In an interview in 1997, Richard Dawkins was asked to "give an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the genome." Apparently unable to answer, he paused a long time and finally responded by changing the subject.
Source:
AIG, 1998. Skeptics choke on Frog: was Dawkins caught on the hop? http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/3907.asp
Keziah Films, "From a Frog to a Prince" (video)
Response:
| | |