View previous topic :: View next topic |
What should his/her score be? |
120 |
|
15% |
[ 2 ] |
115-119 |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
110-114 |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
105-109 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
100-104 |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
90-99 |
|
15% |
[ 2 ] |
80-89 |
|
38% |
[ 5 ] |
70-79 |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
60-69 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Below 60 is OK |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 13 |
|
Author |
Message |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:24 am Post subject: TOEFL iBT: Korean Public School Teachers |
|
|
What score should a Korean English teacher at a public school have? I suppose we could consider anyone teaching English, but the public system is the only place with an extremely-difficult-to-get-through hiring procedure, although obviously it doesn't include English proficiency in any meaningful way. I think the TOEFL iBT is a fair measure.
As to grade levels of the teachers, I'd say it doesn't matter. Any level of student is capable of throwing a curve ball at a teacher, and I think that all teachers need to be equally ready. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hari seldon
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Location: Incheon
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
above link wrote: |
Simon Fraser University
Total Score: 88, with a minimum required score of 20 for each section.
A lesser requirement of a 76 minimum total score is sufficient for entry to the English Bridge Program. |
Simon Fraser is fairly respectable. I'd say they MIGHT admit some teachers to their English Bridge Program. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
robot

Joined: 07 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
You must have a very poor understanding of the iBT -- or unusually high expectations for Korean English teachers -- if you are demanding anything close to a perfect score as a requirement.
I'd bet that a whopping percentage of the Dave's population couldn't break 100 points. That's not necessarily a disparagement of posters' intellect -- native speakers who take it often get mediocre marks.
It's an imperfect test, you see, and not really an accurate judge of English skills or else we all would be able to ace it. The TOEFL in many ways is more a test of how well one can brainstorm quickly under pressure, how familiar one is with the very iBT's formulaic structure.
Even assuming that Dave's posters have flawless grammar (which is obviously not the case, as evidenced on a daily basis on these boards), many would stress out and fumble for words when giving a 45-second independent speaking even on a familar topic with only 15 seconds of prep time. Or they would try to write the independent essay with too much of a writer's flourish, and the time limit would kill their efforts. Or they'd fail to take down important details from the listenings that factor into 3 sections, as they haven't been trained how to predict certain question types, and these missed marks would quickly add up.
I do think the TOEFL would be good for English teacher hopefuls, but I'd go for a more modest mark based on the entrance requirements of most universities -- around 80 or so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
robot wrote: |
You must have a very poor understanding of the iBT -- or unusually high expectations for Korean English teachers -- if you are demanding anything close to a perfect score as a requirement.
I'd bet that a whopping percentage of the Dave's population couldn't break 100 points. That's not necessarily a disparagement of posters' intellect -- native speakers who take it often get mediocre marks.
|
Any more accurate tests for Korean teachers to take, and if so, what scores should we expect? Remember, we're talking about people who are getting paid fairly good money to be teaching the language they would be tested on.
Maybe the whopping percentage of Dave's folk who can't break 100 shouldn't be teaching either. I happen to have several students of middle school age who scored 115. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
robot

Joined: 07 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Marlow.
No, I think the TOEFL would be fine for judging English competence. Much better than a test like SNU's TEPS, anyway. ^^
Infer what you will about Dave's posters, but I'm just saying that most native speakers wouldn't get a perfect score. So whoever voted in the poll that for perfect/near-perfect scores as a requirement for English teaching in Korea might have their expectations too high.
Of the many thousands of students I've taught TOEFL over the last 6 years, I've had quite a few over 115, as well. I wouldn't necessarily prefer them as instructors to any teachers posting on this site. I think it's more fair to say that the iBT is an imperfect test that doesn't truly measure one's ability at English, but that in combination with one's test-taking ability; and more to the point, that a slightly lower score in combination with the standard oral interview and written application might still suffice in judging one's ability to teach the language in Korean public schools. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
robot wrote: |
Hi Marlow.
No, I think the TOEFL would be fine for judging English competence. Much better than a test like SNU's TEPS, anyway. ^^
Infer what you will about Dave's posters, but I'm just saying that most native speakers wouldn't get a perfect score. So whoever voted in the poll that for perfect/near-perfect scores as a requirement for English teaching in Korea might have their expectations too high.
Of the many thousands of students I've taught TOEFL over the last 6 years, I've had quite a few over 115, as well. I wouldn't necessarily prefer them as instructors to any teachers posting on this site. I think it's more fair to say that the iBT is an imperfect test that doesn't truly measure one's ability at English, but that in combination with one's test-taking ability; and more to the point, that a slightly lower score in combination with the standard oral interview and written application might still suffice in judging one's ability to teach the language in Korean public schools. |
Yeah, I agree. I think that unless I drilled myself for a week on the test format, I would not get 120. I'd probably have trouble breaking 100 on a walk-in. I hope the actual English component wouldn't throw me for a loop, though.
I was thinking of my students, and voted for the 115-119 option. I think I'd vote for that option again if I could. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Young FRANKenstein

Joined: 02 Oct 2006 Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why is the iBT test the standard anyway. If we're going to use imperfect tests, why not IELTS? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
juicyhumdinger

Joined: 03 Jan 2005
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you even looked at the Toefl iBT? Obviously not. I'm with the other poster who said most people on this board would score miserably if they went in blind. IMO, anything over 110 is a pretty damn good score. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Young FRANKenstein wrote: |
Why is the iBT test the standard anyway. If we're going to use imperfect tests, why not IELTS? |
Sure. What would be a good score on IELTS for someone being paid to teach English?
juicyhumdinger wrote: |
Have you even looked at the Toefl iBT? Obviously not. I'm with the other poster who said most people on this board would score miserably if they went in blind. IMO, anything over 110 is a pretty damn good score. |
Hopefully an English teacher expecting to be tested wouldn't go in blind. They might need to review the test procedure for a month to make sure they got that down, but hopefully they don't struggle with the actual English usage. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hari seldon
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
robot wrote: |
...I do think the TOEFL would be good for English teacher hopefuls, but I'd go for a more modest mark based on the entrance requirements of most universities -- around 80 or so. |
A Korean high school graduate would require a similar TOEFL score to get accepted to an average university in North America, so surely a TOEFL score of 80 or more isn't an unfair or demanding requirement.
Unfortunately, I think the majority of Korean English teachers in this country if they were tested today would score lower than 80 on the TOEFL. In fact, I suspect more than a few would score much lower.
Most Korean English teachers aren't fluent in English and, therefore, aren't qualified to teach the language.
Last edited by hari seldon on Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:26 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fustiancorduroy
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
For those of you who are saying that a lot of posters on this board would not score that well on the TOEFL, I'll say that the test in large part measures your academic English ability. Based on my experience, I would say that a good number of the foreign teachers here would have a hard time breaking a 100, regardless of whether they knew the test. Being a native English speaker does not necessarily mean being a good listener, critical reader, clear speaker, or succinct writer.
Having said this, any Korean teacher who can break a 100 deserves my plaudits. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Young FRANKenstein

Joined: 02 Oct 2006 Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
marlow wrote: |
Young FRANKenstein wrote: |
Why is the iBT test the standard anyway. If we're going to use imperfect tests, why not IELTS? |
Sure. What would be a good score on IELTS for someone being paid to teach English? |
Dunno. A lot of unis use IELTS as their entrance standard and ask students to have an overall score of 6, with no score less than 5 (for example)
To teach English? I'd say overall 7.5, nothing less than a 6.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hari seldon
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Young FRANKenstein wrote: |
Why is the iBT test the standard anyway. If we're going to use imperfect tests, why not IELTS? |
The TOEFL is more widely recognized and there's more prep material available for it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
fustiancorduroy wrote: |
Having said this, any Korean teacher who can break a 100 deserves my plaudits. |
I'd say they actually deserve their job, too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|