View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Hale

Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Location: the Straight Talk Express
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh man, that was beautiful. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newt is a guy that people really can grow to hate, but he has a gift for direct speech. He says things that few have the guts to say yet everyone knows is the truth.
My favorite part was near the end. Nobody knows just how far the American people are going to be willing to go to bend civil liberties until after we lose a city.
That's very true. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Hale

Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Location: the Straight Talk Express
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My favorite bit was when he made the case for an immediate nuclear strike on Tehran. Not doing so will prove to be a mistake of the Bush govt in my opinion. And of course, he's absolutely correct that we simply arent making enough noise about the threat posed to civilization by extremist religious states. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why doesn't anyone on the of the anti war movement respond to what he says? Not everything (that would be burdensome ) just a few of his points?
They will just call him names which is okay I guess - but first respond to a few of the things he says.
By all all means call him names if you wish - but first earn it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mistermasan
Joined: 20 Sep 2007 Location: 10+ yrs on Dave's ESL cafe
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
who are the leaders of the anti-war movement? seriously.
if it is so serious a threat why doesn't congress declare a war? the way it looks right now is a giant bondoggle for the benefit of the ruling elite.
when i shipped out for desert storm was 86 cents a gallon.
newt gingrich scaremongering. hard to imagine that. 'naff the scaremongers. live free. turn off fox news. so what if they nuke a city. then we turn the middle east- all of it to glass. the big question should be" is oil pumped out from darioactive soil radioactive?"
we can't tell the saudis or other well heeled middle eastern interests what to do. all we can do is react and carry a big stick and the biggest stick is this: you nuke us and we nuke all of you. turn them all to glass, pump the oil dry and bthen build solar panels on the glass.
enough with the scaring. declare, fight and win the war. anything short of that is discussing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The truth is, much like every Republican, he plays on people's fears. This is what Bush did after 9/11 and for awhile, people played along until it was too late and they figured out they've been screwed. Bush clearly had a majority of people behind him, his approval rating was sky high (something like high eight percent range).
Gingrich IS a good speaker and articulate, I'll give him that much. Too bad for the far right his creditablity is so tainted he can't run. He's way further right then McCain and would make Republicans much more happy then who will win the nomination.
He is essentially saying the sky is falling.
This is what is really telling is this statement: "Religiously driven people do things that don't calculate in nice academic faculty surroundings and don't calculate at the State Department and they don't calculate in rational ways in most of our bureaucracies. We are in trouble and somebody better start talking about it in a blunt way." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No not the sky isn't falling. Something else was.
Quote: |
Consider what happened on Aug. 14. Four jihadist suicide-bombers blew themselves up in two Iraqi villages, killing more than 500 Kurdish civilians � men, women and babies � who belonged to a tiny pre-Islamic sect known as the Yazidis. |
http://greenpagan.blogspot.com/2007/08/swift-boated-by-bin-laden.html

Last edited by Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee on Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:39 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mistermasan wrote: |
who are the leaders of the anti-war movement? seriously.
if it is so serious a threat why doesn't congress declare a war? the way it looks right now is a giant bondoggle for the benefit of the ruling elite.
when i shipped out for desert storm was 86 cents a gallon.
newt gingrich scaremongering. hard to imagine that. 'naff the
scaremongers. live free. turn off fox news. so what if they nuke a city. then we turn the middle east- all of it to glass. the big question should be" is oil pumped out from darioactive soil radioactive?"
we can't tell the saudis or other well heeled middle eastern interests what to do. all we can do is react and carry a big stick and the biggest stick is this: you nuke us and we nuke all of you. turn them all to glass, pump the oil dry and bthen build solar panels on the glass.
enough with the scaring. declare, fight and win the war. anything short of that is discussing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. |
Although not put exactly as I would put it, mistermasan does have a point. I think the war, as it was executed, was a big mistake. I didn't think so at the time, but I understand more about the Middle East than I did then.
Actually, the US should have done one of two things: a) Not go in to win hearts and minds, but go in to win. Total, thorough destruction of Iraq and Afghanistan should have been on the table from the beginning. As unpleasant as it sounds (and it is), I can't see how the world would treat the US any differently than it is now. Now we are in this god-awful, smelly sh*t-pile of a "war" with no end in sight. If we had gone in to destroy, the war would have been over long ago. OR b) stayed the hell out of both countries and kept a tight line of sanctions and blockades. Yes, the world's whiners (Europe, Canada, etc.) would still whine, but they would have less of a leg to stand on while they whinged. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
9/11, religious radicalism and Nazism. What a great combination if you want to scare someone into line. Sounds like a move toward a dictatorship to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The audio is just awful. I couldn't watch more than a couple of minutes. From what little I heard (up to where he has grandchildren and South Koreans in Afghanistan), he's just scare-mongering. Same typical nonsense we had during the Cold War.
Solution: fight smart. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta,
It might (and I say this gently) be the computer you are using or your connection. I actually listened to parts of it multiple times to transcribe that part of the speech I quoted in my post. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Hale

Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Location: the Straight Talk Express
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed, there's nothing wrong with the vid at all. And I fail to see why Gingrich is scaremongering at all. Scaremongering with the truth? Well, the bit about Iran desperately trying to acquire nukes is debatable and "we are not prepared today to be a serious country" is unnecessary, unhelpful and simply untrue, but his main point, about the threat posed by religious states in the Middle East and I include Israel because they want to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque and bring on Armageddon (and the messiah) is absolutely true and justified.
We are in trouble.
Milwaukiedave wrote: |
9/11, religious radicalism and Nazism. What a great combination if you want to scare someone into line |
Translation: 'scaring' if you insist into a more realistic, less naive worldview and debate.
Milwaukiedave wrote: |
Sounds like a move toward a dictatorship to me. |
That's what I call scaremongering - legitimate comment a move toward dictatorship. Absolute crap. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
JH,
You fail to even understand the context in which I was referring to the post of the pictures above. How about I put a picture of a nuclear bomb going off in front of you? I bet most people would be scared as hell. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Justin Hale wrote: |
Indeed, there's nothing wrong with the vid at all. And I fail to see why Gingrich is scaremongering at all. Scaremongering with the truth? |
You have a much greater chance of dying from septicemia than you do of dying at the hands of a terrorist. How worried are you about septicemia?
To compare a rag-tag bunch of haters to the Nazi war machine is indicative that one doesn't have a realistic understanding of history.
To Ya-Ta: Pause it and let the video load first. Then play. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|