|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:57 am Post subject: Fl Dems Rule Out Do-over, Michigan Propose June 3 Do-over |
|
|
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/house_dems_in_florida_no_redo.php
"We are committed to working with the DNC, the Florida State Democratic party, our Democratic leaders in Florida, and our two candidates to reach an expedited solution that ensures our 210 delegates are seated. Our House delegation is opposed to a mail-in campaign or any redo of any kind.�
The Florida DNC has said they are not willing to have another election, essentially killing the chance of it happening. Mind you these are the same people who pushed up the primary and created the problem in the first place.
It will be interesting to see Michigan follows suit or continues to push for a firehouse primary in May or June.
Last edited by Milwaukiedave on Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
So why did they work AGAINST the DNC on the first go 'round?
Bunch of dopes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| There are a lot of people asking that. Of course it's all the DNC's fault. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| .. and I thought I was the first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentX
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Location: Jeolla province
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
So the Florida branch wants to be hard-headed, huh?
Too bad then. They can sit outside Denver if they want to be like that.
And even with Florida being seated, Obama still leads in the delegate count. Does she really want to give him more delegates at this point? With Oregon, Indiana, and Montana left, does she really think getting the big states will save her?
Oh, that's right, the superdelegates! Well, according to recent reports, they're not too fond of her right now. Everyone except the governor who spent 80K on hoes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
It honestly seems to me that many people don't want Florida to be represented at the primary.
I wonder why . . .
Same blog, next post:
| Quote: |
Jon M. Ausman, a member of the Democratic National Committee from Florida, has filed an appeal with the party's rules and bylaws committee, arguing that its 2007 penalties against Michigan and Florida violated the DNC charter itself.
Why?
Because the charter explicitly states that the following members of the party are automatically granted the status of delegates no matter what: �members of the Democratic National Committee, Democratic members of the United States Senate and the Democratic Members of the House of Representatives, former Chairs of the Democratic National Committee.�
Basically: the DNC can take way the earned (pledged) delegates... but it can't touch the automatic (super) delegates, because they're protected by the DNC's charter, which supercedes the DNC's rules and bylaws committee.
The verb used by the DNC charter is "shall."
So -- if the RBC hears the appeal, which they'd do at a meeting in, I think, April, and if they agree, the 23 superdelegates from Florida will be eligible for counting. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read an opinion piece suggesting the Democratic NATIONAL Committee pay for the re-vote. That seems to me to be the best solution.
Go over the head of the state committee if need be and just set a date. If the state leadership doesn't like it, too bad. It would be no problem at all getting volunteers to do the work. I think Dean needs to step up NOW and settle this thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
It honestly seems to me that many people don't want Florida to be represented at the primary.
I wonder why . . .
Same blog, next post:
| Quote: |
Jon M. Ausman, a member of the Democratic National Committee from Florida, has filed an appeal with the party's rules and bylaws committee, arguing that its 2007 penalties against Michigan and Florida violated the DNC charter itself.
Why?
Because the charter explicitly states that the following members of the party are automatically granted the status of delegates no matter what: �members of the Democratic National Committee, Democratic members of the United States Senate and the Democratic Members of the House of Representatives, former Chairs of the Democratic National Committee.�
Basically: the DNC can take way the earned (pledged) delegates... but it can't touch the automatic (super) delegates, because they're protected by the DNC's charter, which supercedes the DNC's rules and bylaws committee.
The verb used by the DNC charter is "shall."
So -- if the RBC hears the appeal, which they'd do at a meeting in, I think, April, and if they agree, the 23 superdelegates from Florida will be eligible for counting. |
|
At least that would be a partial solution to the problem. I don't think 23 superdelegates (even if you assumed they all went for Clinton) will make much of a difference. Then again, it's better then nothing.
Actually it is worth noting that there is currently a lawsuit over the whole Florida debacle and that the next decision is suppose to come down on March 17th. If I have a chance, I'll post a link to information.
Ya-Ta, if the state DNC doesn't want a recount, then let them have their way. I believe that the state party has to agree on it and going over their head to the national DNC is not possible. In the end, it is up to the state party to run it, if they don't want to, that's their problem. The Florida voters know who to blame now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| In the end, it is up to the state party to run it, if they don't want to, that's their problem. |
I disagree. The state party committee is depriving the Democratic citizens of Florida (and Michigan) from having their fair say in who their party's nominee is.
Dean should
a) say that the state parties have one week to reschedule, and all will be forgiven.
b) say further that if the leadership does not comply, they will be banned from being delegates at the next two national conventions.
c) call for volunteers to man the polls and do whatever else is necessary to hold primaries.
d) set a date about 3 weeks from now for the re-vote, to be paid for by the national committee. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Quote: |
| In the end, it is up to the state party to run it, if they don't want to, that's their problem. |
I disagree. The state party committee is depriving the Democratic citizens of Florida (and Michigan) from having their fair say in who their party's nominee is.
Dean should
a) say that the state parties have one week to reschedule, and all will be forgiven.
b) say further that if the leadership does not comply, they will be banned from being delegates at the next two national conventions.
c) call for volunteers to man the polls and do whatever else is necessary to hold primaries.
d) set a date about 3 weeks from now for the re-vote, to be paid for by the national committee. |
State leaders have been given a number of chances to correct the problem and have failed miserably. In the end primaries are a state matter and Michigan and Florida have to get their act together. I strongly doubt the DNC will step in and override the state. I was looking for the rules for primaires for the DNC, but didn't really have much time. I believe the rules state that the state parties are responsible for the primaires.
It comes down to the fact that Florida broke the rules and now refuses to hold primaries because they are making an all or nothing threat (either the whole delegation be seated as is or just try to penalize us). Some will point fingers at the DNC, but those fingers really should be pointed at Florida's Democratic Party (don't forget Michigan as well).
So what happens the next time a state breaks the rules? What are the consequences? Let's say in 2012 Oregon (I'll use it for this example since it's my home state, though I doubt they'd do it) breaks the rules we schedule our primary first. The DNC says we are going to penalize you all of your delegates. Oregon comes back and says, "well you sat Florida, you have to seat us." The sad fact is there is no consequence and all hell REALLY breaks loose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
According to the article linked below, the real problem seems to be the Florida Congressional delegation. That wasn't what I understood before. The article is not very informative: "Members of Florida's congressional delegation reiterated their opposition to the plan, saying, "We do not believe that this is a realistic option at this time and remain opposed to a mail-in ballot election or any new primary election in Florida of any kind." Although I'd be interested in hearing their reasons for opposition, my gut says to tell them to go fly a kite.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080313/ap_on_el_pr/primary_scramble
Something needs to be done quickly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hmm..I think they need to be told something a little worse then go fly a kite. Maybe closer to "you guys need to clean up your act or quit the party and find other jobs" would be more like it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Update...
Florida gives up on re-vote
Florida Democratic chairwoman Karen Thurman sends out an angry email abandoning hope of a re-vote in the state:
Last week, the Florida Democratic Party laid out the only existing way that we can comply with DNC Rules � a statewide revote run by the Party � and asked for input.
Thousands of people responded. We spent the weekend reviewing your messages, and while your reasons vary widely, the consensus is clear: Florida doesn�t want to vote again.
So we won�t.
This is a real setback for Hillary, who could have gotten both delegates, momentum, and -- crucially -- a stronger chance to claim a popular vote lead out of the revote.
Thurman says they're not giving up, with the other options, in theory, being to recognize the earlier vote, to agree on a 50-50 split, or some compromise in between.
"This doesn�t mean that Democrats are giving up on Florida voters. It means that a solution will have to come from the DNC Rules & Bylaws Committee, which is scheduled to meet again in April," Thurman writes.
I'm not sure a process issue like this one -- getting shut out of the primary process -- will move Democratic voters in November, but I suspect John McCain's pollsters will find out.
Meanwhile on the Michigan plan for revoting...
Michigan leaders propose June 3 primary
I've gotten a copy of the draft legislation that Michigan Democratic leaders are set to back.
According to the summary, it would:
"Designate June 3, 2008 as the date of a state presidential primary election in Michigan. The election would be conducted in the same manner as a regular election in Michigan, except for procedures specific to presidential primaries such as party ballot selection. " |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentX
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Location: Jeolla province
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
FL had their chance. At least Michigan is being reasonable and adapting to fit within the rules.
FL wants to be hard-headed then. I disagreed with their excuses as to why it had to be a primary only.
How hard is it to mail out a goddamn letter?! You check the databases for addresses, you send them out, people fill them out, and send them back. If they muck it up, send another one or have 'em fax it in.
But no, they wanna do it their way...too bad. I hope the DNC rules committee holds their ground. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| But no, they wanna do it their way...too bad. I hope the DNC rules committee holds their ground. |
I agree. Florida needs to either hold a re-vote or shut up and stay home. At this point, I'm willing to consider a motion to remove their star from the flag. Do I hear a motion? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|