Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Police state? The criminal prosecution of Don Seigelman
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
R. S. Refugee



Joined: 29 Sep 2004
Location: Shangra La, ROK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:40 pm    Post subject: Police state? The criminal prosecution of Don Seigelman Reply with quote

It Does Happen in America
The Political Trial of Don Siegelman

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts03012008.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul Craig Roberts is 9-11 conspiracy theorist.

Counterpunch is an organization that supports the insurgents in Iraq.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we are going on what Counterpunch says then Obama is a pandering crook and a liar.

http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez02292008.html

Just curious RSR. Do you share the same view of Obama as the author of the above article?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regardless the politics of counterpunch is there any truth to the story? It is the first time I have heard about it and it by no means seem beyond belief.

Have we come to the point where a article is simply dismissed because of it's point of origin?

I will have to plead ignorance when it comes to counterpunch. Enlighten me as to why any and all stories it posts are to be summarily dimissed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
SUPPORT FOR the right of Iraqis to resist occupation must extend beyond an abstract principle for the U.S. antiwar movement.

While recognizing "the right of the Iraqi people to resist as a point of principle," Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies--in widely circulated notes for a speech to the steering committee of United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ) on December 18--argued, "We should not call for 'supporting the resistance' because we don't know who most of them are and what they really stand for, and because of those we do know, we mostly don't support their social program beyond opposition to the occupation."

To be meaningful, however, supporting the "right to resist" must include support for that resistance once it actually emerges.

Award-winning Indian writer and global justice activist Arundhati Roy got to the heart of the issue in a San Francisco speech on August 16: "It is absurd to condemn the resistance to the U.S. occupation in Iraq, as being masterminded by terrorists," she said. "After all, if the United States were invaded and occupied, would everybody who fought to liberate it be a terrorist?"

If we are waiting for the "ideologically pure" movement--assuming the unlikely scenario that all those opposed to the war could agree on one--we could be waiting forever.

As Roy explained, "Like most resistance movements, [the Iraqis] combine a motley range of assorted factions. Former Baathists, liberals, Islamists, fed-up collaborationists, communists, etc. Of course, it is riddled with opportunism, local rivalry, demagoguery and criminality. But if we were to only support pristine movements, then no resistance will be worthy of our purity.


http://www.counterpunch.org/smith01212005.html

counterpunch supports the enemy.


Paul Craig Roberts is a 9-11 conspiracy theorist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Quote:
SUPPORT FOR the right of Iraqis to resist occupation must extend beyond an abstract principle for the U.S. antiwar movement.

While recognizing "the right of the Iraqi people to resist as a point of principle," Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies--in widely circulated notes for a speech to the steering committee of United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ) on December 18--argued, "We should not call for 'supporting the resistance' because we don't know who most of them are and what they really stand for, and because of those we do know, we mostly don't support their social program beyond opposition to the occupation."

To be meaningful, however, supporting the "right to resist" must include support for that resistance once it actually emerges.

Award-winning Indian writer and global justice activist Arundhati Roy got to the heart of the issue in a San Francisco speech on August 16: "It is absurd to condemn the resistance to the U.S. occupation in Iraq, as being masterminded by terrorists," she said. "After all, if the United States were invaded and occupied, would everybody who fought to liberate it be a terrorist?"

If we are waiting for the "ideologically pure" movement--assuming the unlikely scenario that all those opposed to the war could agree on one--we could be waiting forever.

As Roy explained, "Like most resistance movements, [the Iraqis] combine a motley range of assorted factions. Former Baathists, liberals, Islamists, fed-up collaborationists, communists, etc. Of course, it is riddled with opportunism, local rivalry, demagoguery and criminality. But if we were to only support pristine movements, then no resistance will be worthy of our purity.


http://www.counterpunch.org/smith01212005.html

counterpunch supports the enemy.


Paul Craig Roberts is a 9-11 conspiracy theorist.



I'm sorry but I don't disagree with a single thing the author of that piece stated. There are various groups who are targeting the US at the moment in Iraq. Labelling them all terrorist IS ridiculous. I guess I suppourt the "enemy".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Before we prescribe how a pristine Iraqi resistance must conduct their secular, feminist, democratic, nonviolent battle, we should shore up our end of the resistance by forcing the U.S. and its allied governments to withdraw from Iraq



maybe you do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can I still go to Florida for winter vacation?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
R. S. Refugee



Joined: 29 Sep 2004
Location: Shangra La, ROK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yawarakaijin wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Quote:
SUPPORT FOR the right of Iraqis to resist occupation must extend beyond an abstract principle for the U.S. antiwar movement.

While recognizing "the right of the Iraqi people to resist as a point of principle," Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies--in widely circulated notes for a speech to the steering committee of United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ) on December 18--argued, "We should not call for 'supporting the resistance' because we don't know who most of them are and what they really stand for, and because of those we do know, we mostly don't support their social program beyond opposition to the occupation."

To be meaningful, however, supporting the "right to resist" must include support for that resistance once it actually emerges.

Award-winning Indian writer and global justice activist Arundhati Roy got to the heart of the issue in a San Francisco speech on August 16: "It is absurd to condemn the resistance to the U.S. occupation in Iraq, as being masterminded by terrorists," she said. "After all, if the United States were invaded and occupied, would everybody who fought to liberate it be a terrorist?"

If we are waiting for the "ideologically pure" movement--assuming the unlikely scenario that all those opposed to the war could agree on one--we could be waiting forever.

As Roy explained, "Like most resistance movements, [the Iraqis] combine a motley range of assorted factions. Former Baathists, liberals, Islamists, fed-up collaborationists, communists, etc. Of course, it is riddled with opportunism, local rivalry, demagoguery and criminality. But if we were to only support pristine movements, then no resistance will be worthy of our purity.


http://www.counterpunch.org/smith01212005.html

counterpunch supports the enemy.


Paul Craig Roberts is a 9-11 conspiracy theorist.



I'm sorry but I don't disagree with a single thing the author of that piece stated. There are various groups who are targeting the US at the moment in Iraq. Labelling them all terrorist IS ridiculous. I guess I suppourt the "enemy".


You seem to be a thoughtful chap unlike those on this forum who do such a wonderful portrayal of people suffering from syphilitic brain-wasting disease. Though I honestly do feel compassion for them and the suffering that they are seemingly experiencing every moment of their sad, unloved lives, I long ago quit wasting the precious moments of my life responding to such wasters. I don't feel too guilty about not responding to them.

Anyway, here's what that commie-infested, terrorist-loving, Amerika-hating bunch, 60 Minutes, has to say about the story. Enjoy. But watch out. I see one of these wasters gettin' ready to drop his drawers and take a dump on them any second now. Very Happy Laughing Very Happy

http://youtube.com/watch?v=NsqA0-3hXoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
syphilitic brain-wasting disease


so that is why you apologize for any enemy of the US and are so blind that you see evil only in the US and its enemies.

I guess it destroyed your eye sight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Joo. Did you watch the clip? Do you have any contradictory information to the said piece or is your response to everything this administration has done simply going to be "well at least we are not as bad as the bad guys"?

You seem like a guy who has convictions, no problem with that, but are you really incapable of coming up with ANY arguement more substantial than "but mommy, Jill does it too!"

I'm starting to think that you are, in fact, the most successful troll on this entire board.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
R. S. Refugee



Joined: 29 Sep 2004
Location: Shangra La, ROK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yawarakaijin wrote:


I'm starting to think that you are, in fact, the most successful troll on this entire board.


Uh-oh. The truth is beginning to seep out, Joo. But don't worry. I won't squeel about our good-cop-bad-cop-discredit-the-right-wing-nutballs-by-portraying-them-as-syphilitic-mind-wasting-degenerates scam. Very Happy Laughing Very Happy

Edited: Humanitarian impulses caused me to think better of some of the other satirical comments I made and remove them. Whew. That makes my conscience feel a lot better.

Oh damn. Thought of another one. Edited it too. See, I'm not so bad, Joo. Very Happy Laughing Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Counterpunch is where syphilitic-mind-wasting-degenerates go to conjugate.

The only information on that site is misinformation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Paul Craig Roberts is 9-11 conspiracy theorist.

Counterpunch is an organization that supports the insurgents in Iraq.


If you can't attack the claim, attack the source, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Counterpunch is where syphilitic-mind-wasting-degenerates go to conjugate.

The only information on that site is misinformation.


Troll. Is 60 minutes now equivalent to Counterpunch? If Hitler told you the sky was blue would you argue the fact just cause Hitler was the source?

You are a joke sir.

I don't prescribe to any one particular ideology but I know a news story when I see one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International