|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jkelly80

Joined: 13 Jun 2007 Location: you boys like mexico?
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
This could be a big problem. His crypto-liberalism begins to show. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Obama's Michelle Problem
By Mickey Kaus
Updated Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2008, at 5:46 AM ET
Is that an S-Chip on Your Shoulder or Are You Just Glad to See Me? John Podhoretz argues that Michelle Obama's comment--about how "for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country"--
suggests the Obama campaign really does have its roots in New Class leftism, according to which patriotism is not only the last refuge of a scoundrel, but the first refuge as well � that America is not fundamentally good but flawed, but rather fundamentally flawed and only occasionally good.
He could be right! Her comment is also of a piece with the cavalier Obamaesque dismissal of the achievements of the Clinton years and her church's focus on "this racist United States of America." But is the explanation necessarily political? Even Dennis Kucinich would probably have no problem finding something to be proud of in the past two decades. If Michelle Obama's default position is set to "Aggrieved," it also suggests something personal, no? Maybe, like many strong wives, she wonders why her husband is the one on the top of the family ticket--which might also explain her strange occasional habit of belittling him in public ("snore-y and stinky" ). Beats me. For whatever reason, she sure seems to have a non-trivial chip on her shoulder and it's not a winning quality. ... |
http://www.slate.com/id/2184672/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I read a really good book for the first time this year.
(that doesn't mean I was unable to find a good book up until now)
That's besides the point though - even though I understand she's making stump speeches for her husband I think there should be a bit of lenience for spouses or family members, which would include Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton for example. With full-time politicians you can parse their speeches in endless ways to see what they really mean, and the slightest change in wording can mean a large change in policy but for others, not so much. Bill Clinton is the exception of course. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was going to say:
I have some sympathy for Obama. His wife said this. After all, we shouldn't pillory Hillary for Bill's shill.
But, of course, Bill Clinton is an exception. Care to explain this double standard, Mith? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kuros wrote: |
But, of course, Bill Clinton is an exception. Care to explain this double standard, Mith? |
Sure. He was president. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
mithridates wrote: |
Kuros wrote: |
But, of course, Bill Clinton is an exception. Care to explain this double standard, Mith? |
Sure. He was president. |
But Bill is not Hillary.
So what you're saying is that we can blame the candidates themselves for things their supporters say, as long as the supporters are politicians themselves?
And the definition of politician is President? Or at least the definition encompasses President? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kuros wrote: |
mithridates wrote: |
Kuros wrote: |
But, of course, Bill Clinton is an exception. Care to explain this double standard, Mith? |
Sure. He was president. |
But Bill is not Hillary.
So what you're saying is that we can blame the candidates themselves for things their supporters say, as long as the supporters are politicians themselves?
And the definition of politician is President? Or at least the definition encompasses President? |
No, I'd expect that any politician of enough years would know enough about positive and negative press to expect what comments are going to be glazed over by the press and which would get picked up and made into a story.
In the same way, if Laura Bush ran for president I would expect George Bush to know what not and what not to say when stumping for her. Not that Michelle Obama or any others should be given carte blanche, but I don't think there's as much value in poring over the fine print in their speeches as those who have been around for long enough.
IOW, if a career politician had said "for the first time in my life I feel really proud of my country" I'd assume it's probably to score a point somehow; with somebody like Michelle Obama or Chelsea Clinton I'd assume it was a slipup. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find it hilarious that this is the most critics of Obama can come up with to harp on. I question the reasonability of my fellow US citizens at times, but I don't think they're stupid enough to eat this poo. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
with somebody like Michelle Obama or Chelsea Clinton I'd assume it was a slipup. |
I wonder how many of us, as in ESLers and other expats, would, if asked in a point-blank fashion, claim to be proud of our country. I mean, no matter how starry-eyed you are when you first come over here, after a few years hanging out with other westerners who don't care jack squat about your homeland's cherished self-image, after a while the message kind of sinks in that there's nothing particularly special about anyone's place of origin.
And look at this forum. We all know that if anyone came on here and proclaimed himself proud of his country, and proceeded to list the reasons why, he'd be torn to shreds in a matter of minutes. Even if you continued sporting a "superpatriot" public persona, eventually, at some level, the constant barrage of abuse that you receive in reply is gonna alter your perspective on things. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Czarjorge wrote: |
I find it hilarious that this is the most critics of Obama can come up with to harp on. |
I find it both hilarious and encouraging. The loudest echo-chamber in the world can't make a mountain out of this molehill. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
with somebody like Michelle Obama or Chelsea Clinton I'd assume it was a slipup. |
I wonder how many of us, as in ESLers and other expats, would, if asked in a point-blank fashion, claim to be proud of our country. I mean, no matter how starry-eyed you are when you first come over here, after a few years hanging out with other westerners who don't care jack squat about your homeland's cherished self-image, after a while the message kind of sinks in that there's nothing particularly special about anyone's place of origin.
And look at this forum. We all know that if anyone came on here and proclaimed himself proud of his country, and proceeded to list the reasons why, he'd be torn to shreds in a matter of minutes. Even if you continued sporting a "superpatriot" public persona, eventually, at some level, the constant barrage of abuse that you receive in reply is gonna alter your perspective on things. |
"for the first time in my life, I am proud of my country [now that my husband is a frontrunner for the Democratic nomination of President]."
Somehow, I don't think *any* of us can relate to this one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Only the 'My country, right or wrong' superpatriot crowd is going to pay attention to this one. But they will exploit it for all it's worth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mistermasan
Joined: 20 Sep 2007 Location: 10+ yrs on Dave's ESL cafe
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmm...from killing of social leaders to vietnam to watergate to iran hostages there wasn't a whole lotta chest thumping growing up. throw in a few recessions, a gas crisis or two...and no we didn't have alot to write home about.
would you expect a black woman gto take pride in the regan era? it wasn't that great of a time to be a worker. reagan begat bush and a full fledged return to the war as an economic weapon.
i woulda guessed mrs.obama woulda enjoyed the clinton years but maybe she didn't like how for many years the administration was bogged down (impeached for oral sex!) due to partisan bickering.black hawk down.bombing other countries to change the news cycle stateside. the worst "say one thing and do something else" around. clinton gave way to bush. what has happened inthe bush years to fill us with pride?
i was raised roman catholic. in that world view, "pride" is one of the "deadly sins" and something to be avoided. nothing good comes from pride. nowthat i have grown up and recognized that atheism is the only logical route the idea that pride is deadly has yet to be refuted. avoid pride. avoid those who tell you to be proud. it is a cheap concept. be strong. be secure in who you are. don't buy into pride.
and now that she is telling us she is "proud"? well, we are the words we use. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's the truly interesting question: is it proper (or moral, or patriotic, or acceptable, or what-have-you) to be less proud of one's country when it is taking action of which one severely disapproves?
For example, if one believes that it is immoral to torture another human being under any circumstances, is it "patriotic" to continue to be "proud of one's country" while it tortures?
Most of the comments I'm hearing from the Right on this issue seem to carry the assumption that it is always unpatriotic and bad to say "I'm not proud of America right now". I strongly dispute that point of view, and moreover I consider it morally indefensible. (Or, if one postulates a dimension of "national pride" that is utterly divorced from the actual nation in question, logically indefensible.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|