|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
How do you like the way CE is changing, the status quo? |
I prefer the old ways... |
|
38% |
[ 13 ] |
I think the mods are doing their best, it can't be perfect |
|
11% |
[ 4 ] |
The mods are too heavy-handed |
|
20% |
[ 7 ] |
I think the guidelines are not perfect, but needed |
|
29% |
[ 10 ] |
|
Total Votes : 34 |
|
Author |
Message |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:05 pm Post subject: I was happy with the way this forum was |
|
|
I don't see the need for any of this intervention we've been getting lately. I don't go in for the tooth-and-nail debating style myself, but some people like it, that's their thing, and it keeps the discussion entertaining. There should be room for all sorts of styles.
And as for this "no insulting whole groups of people" rule...
Islamophobia is a crude oversimplification of reality. However, if we're gonna enforce a rule against insulting an entire religion, where is that gonna end? Religion is not race. Joining a religion commits you to believing and doing certain things, and if some people find those things moronic or barbaric, well, I guess they're gonna think you're a moron and a barbarian. That's pretty much the fate of anyone who joins any group, religious or otherwise.
Of course, sometimes people misrepresent what a group believes, but on this forum we certainly seem to have enough people willing to defend(for example) Islam against false allegations for that not to be a major problem. Granted, Scientologists would probably find few defenders, but that's just because eveyone knows that they're a bunch of brain-dead, ignor- oh yeah, sorry. Forgot about the new regs.
Anyway, I don't know how to post a poll, but I invite anyone who agrees with me to step forward and say so. And if you disagree, feel free to call me a self-aggrandizing asshole.
Last edited by On the other hand on Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Enrico Palazzo Mod Team


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand, I edited your post and placed a poll for you per your request. It's easy to place a poll. Just go below where it says poll and put a question and then hit add options.
A poll was placed. Let me get the results...
What are your views of this forum?
It is completely fine the way it is, no changes please
31% [ 5 ]
It has many good posters, but there are problems with spamming, propaganda, stereotyping, flaming
31% [ 5 ]
What took the mods so long to do anything?
6% [ 1 ]
There aren't enough female contributions on the forum
6% [ 1 ]
OPTIONS 2 and 3
25% [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 16
If we analyze the data, though I placed another poll for your convenience, 62% want changes and 31% don't want changes and 6% wanted more females on here. However, people can vote again as the guidelines have come into action over the past week.
I think a particular religion or creed can be discussed without engaging in unsubstantiated stereotypes. For example, one poster in a thread a few weeks ago, said that everyone who follows Islam or says they believe in it, believes in violence and is violent-prone. I am paraphrasing.
It's one thing to disagree with a religion, and one thing to engage in bigotry.
There's a difference. I know it's en vogue to engage in Islamic bashing just as it was en vogue to engage in Jewish bashing or anti-Semitism in the 1930s and have Catholic youths taught Jews have horns.
I am hoping enough people have enough restraint, want to use their IQ to engage in a civil discussion. This isn't the Archie Bunker Current Events Forum. It is not like I didn't think about this topic that you mentioned. It is a thorny one.
The guidelines have been placed and no matter whether we're dealing with cultures, religions or what have you. Being a moderator is a very tough task. The same would apply to calling Ashkenazi Jews fascists as one poster stated earlier. Are you suggesting this is how the forum should appear? If so, please advise. Do other members feel the same way. Feel free to use this new poll.
Last edited by Enrico Palazzo on Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:46 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On the other hand, I edited your post and placed a poll for you per your request. It's easy to place a poll. Just go below where it says poll and put a question and then hit add options.
|
Yeah, I'm a bit of a luddite when it comes to this stuff. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Funkdafied

Joined: 04 Nov 2007 Location: In Da House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I think the forum was perfectly fine and in fact much better before. What is happening here amounts to stifling free speech.
By the way, suggesting that Islam is a religion that promotes violence and tends to create violence is not a baseless accusation. The mod in question seems very much like a pc fascist at this point. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand: what exactly prompted you to ask this? Something specific must have happened. Can you explain? (No, I do not read all the threads on this forum -- far from it. So something may have happened that I did not see.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On the other hand: what exactly prompted you to ask this? Something specific must have happened. Can you explain? |
Well, first of all, there were the new regs in general, which I had been only vaguely aware of as a result of not having read the forum too closely the past few weeks, since personal reasons have limited my internet access for a bit.
But the immediate prompt was noticing that a thread on Islam, containing rhetoric etc that would have pretty much been par for the course a month ago, had been shut down. And it wasn't just the anti-Islamic faction that was being chastised. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would also like to observe that I've just been over to the General Disucssion Forum, and generalizations about Korea and Koreans would appear to be alive and well over there, garnering little or no attention from the mods. Moreover, Korea is not a religion, and hence the generalizations are even less justified than the ones that get made about Islam over here.
I am aware that there was some sort of drive by the mods to rid the General Forum of anti-Korean invective. It would not appear to be much in force, however. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only thread I'm aware of is the one where I insulted a certain poster. In my opinion, anyone who says that every single Muslim (or member of any group, doesn't really matter) would want to harm him simply because he said something heretical in their view, does not deserve respect. Criticize the group's beliefs all you want, but when you dehumanize people like that, you cross the line. Hell, I even asked him to clarify (albeit in a rather a-hole way), and well, he clarified all right.
There might be other threads, I don't know. I haven't been on the forum much the past few days, and I can't imagine OTOH posting this after just one thread.
edit: eh, never mind. guess it is just that one.
Last edited by bucheon bum on Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funkdafied wrote: |
Yes, I think the forum was perfectly fine and in fact much better before. What is happening here amounts to stifling free speech.
By the way, suggesting that Islam is a religion that promotes violence and tends to create violence is not a baseless accusation. The mod in question seems very much like a pc fascist at this point. |
Yep that was the proverbial straw. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I think a particular religion or creed can be discussed without engaging in unsubstantiated stereotypes. For example, one poster in a thread a few weeks ago, said that everyone who follows Islam or says they believe in it, believes in violence and is violent-prone. |
Well, I agree that that's a wrong statement about Islam. But if I were to say that the Westboro Baptists(the Rev. Phelps gang) are a bunch of screaming psychopaths, how would that stand with the "no generalizations" rule? After all, there might be one or two Westboro Baptists who don't go in for picketting random funerals. But would that get the thread shut down as a result? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
There might be other threads, I don't know. I haven't been on the forum much the past few days, and I can't imagine OTOH posting this after just one thread.
edit: eh, never mind. guess it is just that one.
|
Yeah, that was the only one that I was aware of, to date. But I was kind of anticipating what that would bode for the board in the future. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It seems from what I have seen that the 2 newest moderators are at fault
in these latest incidents with encouragement from Pokie.
I think the mods need a meeting, I for one am calling for the banishment of Kitty and Enrico and wrist slapping for Pokie.
We really don't need this many Mods.
I'd like the other Mods to chime in her also.
Power corrupts and these two have proven the point.
There are no rules there are only guidelines.
edit: ran spell check
Last edited by cbclark4 on Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a good for instance about guidelines.
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=102772
This link is to a thread where many of the participants have pasted very long selections into their replies.
This is against the guidelines, we are supposed to limit our word count.
Now I happen to like that thread I do not think it should be deleted.
However if Enrico Suave' wants to "enforce" guideline that wonderful
thread would be gone.
The heavy handedness is draconian a couple of day old mods getting
carried away big time.
It's just not good Mod form. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Enrico Palazzo Mod Team


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbclark4 wrote: |
It seems from what I have seen that the 2 newest moderators are at fault
in these latest incedents wit hencouragement from Pokie.
I think the mods need a meeting, I for one am calling for the bannishment of Kitty and Enrico and wrist slapping for Pokie.
We really don't need this many Mods.
I'd like trhe other Mods to chime in her also.
Power corrupts and these two have proven the point.
There are no rules there are only guidelines. |
You are an ESL teacher, I presume. Right? Then, you will have read, I assume, that it said rules and guidelines. That contradicts your statement that the guidelines don't entail rules. The other moderators saw the rules, the majority of the posters saw the rules. Since the majority of moderators saw the rules and approved them, where does that leave you? Insulting the moderators how does that help anything? Insulting a poster whether a moderator or poster is a violation of the rules, guidelines. You are a teacher, read the rules, you have studied the 3Rs.
Funkdafied, will you kindly quote me where a moderator said no one can comment on a religion? Find the quote. I would appreciate that.
This was all clearly outlined in the rules and guidelines, and it said nothing about not being able to say that Judaism or Islam don't promote violence.
Now, here is the part where people run into problems: Let's pretend there is a religion called Martianism. The people who follow it are Martians.
There are 4 chapters of their holy book that seems to many observers to promote violence. Now, if a person says Martians simply believe in violence without any polls, substantiation, is engaging in stereotypes
then there is a problem.
Cblark, you don't like the guidelines. I get it, but knock off the personal attacks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Enrico Palazzo wrote: |
cbclark4 wrote: |
It seems from what I have seen that the 2 newest moderators are at fault
in these latest incedents wit hencouragement from Pokie.
I think the mods need a meeting, I for one am calling for the bannishment of Kitty and Enrico and wrist slapping for Pokie.
We really don't need this many Mods.
I'd like trhe other Mods to chime in her also.
Power corrupts and these two have proven the point.
There are no rules there are only guidelines. |
You are an ESL teacher, I presume. Right? Then, you will have read, I assume, that it said rules and guidelines. That contradicts your statement that the guidelines don't entail rules. The other moderators saw the rules, the majority of the posters saw the rules. Since the majority of moderators saw the rules and approved them, where does that leave you? Insulting the moderators how does that help anything? Insulting a poster whether a moderator or poster is a violation of the rules, guidelines. You are a teacher, read the rules, you have studied the 3Rs.
Funkdafied, will you kindly quote me where a moderator said no one can comment on a religion? Find the quote. I would appreciate that.
This was all clearly outlined in the rules and guidelines, and it said nothing about not being able to say that Judaism or Islam don't promote violence.
Now, here is the part where people run into problems: Let's pretend there is a religion called Martianism. The people who follow it are Martians.
There are 4 chapters of their holy book that seems to many observers to promote violence. Now, if a person says Martians simply believe in violence without any polls, substantiation, is engaging in stereotypes
then there is a problem.
Cblark, you don't like the guidelines. I get it, but knock off the personal attacks. |
Please do not misconstrue.
A call for your resignation should not be taken as a personal attack.
Calling attention to your censorship of acticles within this forum is not a
personal attack.
These statements relevant to the conversation at hand.
The decisions made by the new breed of moderators are flawed.
I repeat my call for your to resign. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|