It's about HIV+ people being deported.
The court was said to rule on it last month, but I haven't been able to find out what the court ruled.
Anyone know?
I ended up finding the ruling in case anyone is curious...
The court ruled that there wasn't a compelling interest in deporting him because it would only deter others from getting HIV tests, which would ultimately cause problems/spread of HIV. That, and it's just a human rights violation.
Funny how they rule like this, but in case of a rape, if she's wearing tight jeans it's not rape. Granted, I don't know if it's the same court...
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
