Korean Job Discussion Forums

[Kuros]

Here's why

Because the CA Supreme Court extended strict scrutiny towards gov't policy rather than using the looser rational basis test employed by the MA court. Strict scrutiny is commonly used only when dealing with possible racial discrimination/bias. Well, now gays are effectively in the same heavily protected class.

Even should the proposed narrow referendum overturn this decision's grant of a right for gays to marry, the strict scrutiny test has already been established as a precedent for other state couts to follow. This is a monumental decision and a historical moment in gay-rights history.

[Quack Addict]

What's next...people having the right to marry their dogs...all for the sake of beastiality-rights....pathetic.

[bucheon bum]

[mises]

http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/05/15/honey-and-sweetheart/

[traveler81]

So how about polygamy? Who's to say that "marriage" should be limited to only two persons? Let's open it up to three+ I say.

[Nowhere Man]

The timing of this is very interesting.