| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:00 am Post subject: We were clueless about insurgency says Wolfowitz |
|
|
| Quote: |
WASHINGTON � Paul Wolfowitz, in his first public remarks on the Iraq war in years, said the American government was "pretty much clueless on counterinsurgency" in the first year of the war.
The former deputy secretary of defense said yesterday that the force sent to Iraq was adequate for fighting Saddam Hussein's military, citing the speed with which American troops toppled the regime. But Mr. Wolfowitz said no one in the Bush administration anticipated that Saddam would order his security services to wage an insurgency after their formal defeat on the battlefield.
|
Somthing to remember next time the Republicans claim that Democrats are weak on military issues.
http://tinyurl.com/6cewmq |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:09 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
I like the page 2 bit where they're planning the invasion in December.
Now call me a a left-wing trolley dodger, but I still get the idea that those bat-shit insane douches frolicking about the White House circa 2002 had it in mind to take out that whole axis of evil, possibly even in the bat-shittiest time frame of before 2004. What douches.
They were clueless bout the insurgency because they were already half-way to Tehran and only looking back at the Iraqi cheerleaders.
Bat shit.
Douches. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ha ha. The neo-cons are amusing. They're like a bunch of college freshman trying to rule the world in one of their bull sessions. So naive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| ...the deputy secretary of defense downplayed testimony from a retired Army chief of staff, General Eric Shinseki, who told Congress that postwar stabilization operations would require several hundred thousand troops. |
This goes to the very heart of the W. Bush Administration's failure -- once it decided to invade Iraq, that is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I get the feeling that those boys played way too much Risk in high school--and took it seriously. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentX
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Location: Jeolla province
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, Wolfie...getting lonely being on the political backburner, eh?
Now he's resorting to making things up.
Other than the Baathists, there was no insurgency until a certain SOMEONE decided to disband the Iraqi military, over the protests of Gen. McCaffrey.
You're doing a heckuva job there, Wolfie! Way to win one for the home team! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Ha ha. The neo-cons are amusing. They're like a bunch of college freshman trying to rule the world in one of their bull sessions. So naive. |
Back when the neo-cons were still in their Mission Accomplished euphoria, I saw something published by some neo-con think tank where the guy was arguing that the next target for liberation should be North Korea. He thought it could really be a success, because they'd go in with backup from South Korean troops, who'd know the language and thus have an easy time pacifying the country.
Yep, an army trained on that kind of propaganda is really gonna go all soft and cuddly just because the guy pointing the gun at them is speaking Korean instead of English. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Yep, an army trained on that kind of propaganda is really gonna go all soft and cuddly just because the guy pointing the gun at them is speaking Korean instead of English. |
It's only 98% nuts. There's about a 2% chance the Norks would go all soft and cuddly when the Chinese army started poking 'em in the butt with their bayonets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| Quote: |
| ...the deputy secretary of defense downplayed testimony from a retired Army chief of staff, General Eric Shinseki, who told Congress that postwar stabilization operations would require several hundred thousand troops. |
This goes to the very heart of the W. Bush Administration's failure -- once it decided to invade Iraq, that is. |
Hey I thought you used to claim criticizing Bush was unpatriotic or unAmerican? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| agentX wrote: |
Ah, Wolfie...getting lonely being on the political backburner, eh?
Now he's resorting to making things up.
Other than the Baathists, there was no insurgency until a certain SOMEONE decided to disband the Iraqi military, over the protests of Gen. McCaffrey.
You're doing a heckuva job there, Wolfie! Way to win one for the home team! |
But Saddam's son was waging such a war during the war. If you'll recall America took the most casualties from irregular forces, the Fedayeen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mnhnhyouh

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Location: The Middle Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IIRC, they had boxes of U.S. flags for the locals to wave.
I still wonder what they were thinking. I think these guys are smart, so I dont understand.
So often colonial powers have put a minority in power, the minority then needs to stamp hard on the majority and needs the help of the colonizing power to help them. This makes the minority beholding to the colonizing power, and makes them do all the hard work. (AKA How To Run A Colony 101).
So in Iraq the Sunni muslims held most of the power positions in a Shiite majority country. So in comes the U.S. to instal Democracy 2.0 and expects anything other than a Shiite government, making them the same as their neighbors Iran?
What gives?
Maybe the hatred between Iraq and Iran is so deep because of their past that they wont get together? Bet that isnt true.
So why?
They didnt think this through? Maybe.
h |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W. Bush and co. are not in fact stupid and they did put thought into this war. It was their presuppositions that tainted and undermined their effort. America's high-tech-based military superiority will prevail against any foe, in any environment, at any time or place, for one. (I dislike the analogy that some might immediately see, but I also recognize that we have seen this presupposition and can-do attitude before in American foreign relations history.)
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| Gopher wrote: |
| Quote: |
| ...the deputy secretary of defense downplayed testimony from a retired Army chief of staff, General Eric Shinseki, who told Congress that postwar stabilization operations would require several hundred thousand troops. |
This goes to the very heart of the W. Bush Administration's failure -- once it decided to invade Iraq, that is. |
Hey I thought you used to claim criticizing Bush was unpatriotic or unAmerican? |
Never. I have criticized W. Bush from day one. I never voted for him; neither have I ever supported the Iraqi War. In any case, this strongly suggests that you have missed the nuances of my position on W. Bush, American affairs, and antiAmerican tropes and discourses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentX
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Location: Jeolla province
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
catman

Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I also remember a report about Evangelicals preparing to travel to the liberated country in order to proselytize to the heathen masses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| Ha ha. The neo-cons are amusing. They're like a bunch of college freshman trying to rule the world in one of their bull sessions. So naive. |
I don't accept what Wolfowitz has to say, because many experts warned that things could go very wrong in Iraq. I mean I am not an intelligence officer, and I warned people I knew that things could go majorly wrong, and one would have to plan for the possibility of a rebellion or whatever.
There were people out there who warned that things could go wrong, and the conservative thing to have done was to have an adequate military force. They allowed the collapse of the Soviet Union and the easy liberation of Kuwait to cloud their judgement. I am no expert, but what I predicted in Iraq did happen. They could have consulted with experts, military or non-military otherwise. They are guilty of incompetence.
You have to be able to foresee the possibility that a country you are going to occupy may have rebels. It happens in most situations. It is simply mind-boggling incompetence. I can understand the average American maybe saying that since they can't consult policy experts who know military history, the region etc.... This is just crap. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|