Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Really getting ugly in Beijing
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Beej



Joined: 05 Mar 2005
Location: Eungam Loop

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:34 pm    Post subject: Really getting ugly in Beijing Reply with quote

I am shocked that Chinese people can be so ridiculous. Despite their economic rise, these people just dont get it. I truly fear for the future if this is how Chinese people perceive the world. They should never have been awarded the Olympics.

http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/18/917308.aspx

Mood turns ugly in Beijing Posted: Friday, April 18, 2008 2:16 PM
Filed Under: Beijing, China
By Adrienne Mong, NBC News producer

What a difference a couple of months can make.

As people returned to work following the end of the Chinese New Year holidays in February, there was a palpable sense of anticipation for the Olympic Summer Games. The intense winter cold snap lasted longer than the holidays, but there was a spring in everyone�s step.

Friends working in professions as diverse as business and the arts spoke of an accelerated rate of activity; people seemed to be jetting back and forth from the United States and Europe in a frenzy to meet deadlines on special projects before the Games begin August 8.


My e-mail inbox was getting clogged on a more regular basis with press conference notices from the Beijing Olympic authorities, BOCOG. And I was fielding dozens of requests from far-flung friends to crash on the floor of my apartment in the months leading up to August.

It was as though Beijing had become the center of the world and everyone wanted to be here.

And then, the protests and violence in Tibet and surrounding regions happened.

In response to international condemnation of its policies in Tibet, the Chinese government has taken a hard line against critics. At the same time, Chinese people have become more upset over what they perceive as Western media bias against their nation.

Targeting the Western press
CNN has been the target of intense criticism and threats for allegedly biased coverage of the protests in Tibet, and particularly for remarks made by commentator Jack Cafferty, who referred to China�s leaders � not the Chinese people � as a "bunch of goons and thugs."

On Thursday, CNN�s bureau chief in Beijing was summoned to China�s Foreign Ministry, where officials demanded an apology and a retraction of Cafferty�s comments.

CNN has apologized for any offence, and Cafferty clarified on air earlier in the week that his comments were referring specifically to the government and "not to Chinese people or to Chinese-Americans."


But even before this latest incident, we had heard from CNN staff that non-essential personnel had been asked to stay away from the CNN Beijing office because threats from angry Chinese activists were growing serious.

A Chinese friend who once worked for CNN learned Friday that his name and personal information had been posted on one of the more virulent anti-Western media Web sites in China. He said he was shocked by the coarse language people used to accuse him of being a traitor.

Not just CNN
An acquaintance at a top-selling U.S. newsmagazine described an incident in which someone rang the doorbell of her home and tried to set off a fire extinguisher in her face when she opened the front door.

NBC News hasn�t been subject to the same level of harassment as some other media outlets, but for several weeks now in the late evenings our bureau has received prank phone calls from Chinese people asking whether we are CNN or just randomly cursing all Western media.

The anxiety isn�t confined to journalists.

Chinese furious over how the Olympic torch was received in Paris on April 7 are planning a demonstration Saturday in front of a branch of the French supermarket, Carrefour. And a more widespread boycott of all Carrefour branches planned for May 1 is gathering steam.

A friend with French relatives coming to visit Beijing next week is anxious about how they might be treated and is reluctant to leave them on their own to explore the capital.

In a way, however, this French family is lucky they can even be here.

Crackdown on visitors and residents
Chinese authorities are cracking down on entry visas. Reports are circulating among U.S. businessmen that many companies are starting to suffer from a restriction on business visas for legitimate employees.

Every foreign freelancer or independent contractor I know here is looking for a sponsor, as they�ve been warned their current � and legitimate � business visas are not likely to be renewed. Even a college student whom NBC agreed to take on for the summer has had to cut short his internship, because he won�t be allowed to extend his student visa beyond August 1; extending a visa was previously a common practice.

It�s believed that the visa restrictions are to prevent foreign activists from entering China ahead of the Olympics and staying through the games.

One of our local staffers told me that five security people showed up at her home at 9:30 p.m. Wednesday, pounding on her front door and demanding to see her local residency permit. They were rude, she said, and they examined parts of her apartment without her consent.

"They wanted to know if I was the only one living here," she said.

Of course, some of this might appear trivial compared to the domestic political housecleaning taking place across China. Many dissidents or potential noisemakers have been rounded up since December.

In the wake of these incidents, one can only wonder if this is the image China�s government and its people really want to present to the outside world as they prepare to host an Olympics bearing the banner "One World One Dream."

Perhaps not. A commentary posted on the state-run Xinhua news agency Web site Friday urges the Chinese people to contain their "patriotic zeal."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its really hard for me to approve of these protests.

Quote:
A spokesman for the French Olympic Committee, Denis Masseglia, estimated that a third of the 80 athletes and other VIPs who had been slated to carry the torch did not get to do so.

On a bus carrying French athletes, one man in a track suit shed a tear as protesters pelted the vehicle with eggs, bottles and soda cans.


The protestors actually attacked a disabled Olympic torchbearer.



Video
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ytuque



Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Location: I drink therefore I am!

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They were not attacking the woman but only trying to grab the torch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flummuxt



Joined: 15 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What do you expect?

China is a totalitarian country.

Totalitarian, adjective: of or relating to a political regime based on subordination of the individual to the state and strict control of all aspects of the life and productive capacity of the nation especially by coercive measures (as censorship and terrorism)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Imagine if everyone around the world was protesting Korea in the run up to some games they were holding to prove once and for all their bloodlines are superior, the people of the world come to the feet of the children of Tangun, such is the natural order.

Koreans would FREAK OUT. Now imagine a billion of them and they have nuclear weapons and massive economic clout and even less experience being the butt of the world's jokes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Julius



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 9:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've just been chatting with my (ex) g/f in China.

She's "outraged" that foreigners think Tibet should be independent. "Tibet is China, they are a minority" etc rants.
Chinese are even more brainwashed than koreans I believe. Both are countries where there has been only one official viewpoint presented for sooooo long that they can only think one way. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Julius wrote:
I've just been chatting with my (ex) g/f in China.

She's "outraged" that foreigners think Tibet should be independent. "Tibet is China, they are a minority" etc rants.
Chinese are even more brainwashed than koreans I believe. Both are countries where there has been only one official viewpoint presented for sooooo long that they can only think one way. Rolling Eyes


Yes, the Chinese are brainwashed, etc, etc, etc.

I don't know. As an American, I'm kind of glad we took the land we did from Mexico and the natives. I'm sure Canadians feel the same way about land taken from the natives.

Tibet will never be free. Its too important geopolitically to China. Do you think China is going to allow an independent Tibet to increase Indian influence bordering on China's heartland? I don't think so.

However, Tibetan rights are in disrepair, and something needs to be done about that. I support an autonomous Tibet, where Tibetans can monitor Chinese colonization of their lands and enjoy the advantages other Chinese minorities enjoy.

As for China, I'm not convinced that if it were a democracy, it wouldn't be acting in the same way. The territorial addition of Tibet seems less controversial than allegations of colonisaton, which threaten to subsume Tibetan culture. To me, China's relations abroad, with the Sudan, Burma, and Zimbabwe, are more scandalous than their acquisition of Tibet.

At least Mongolia is still free.


Edit:

Protest Stupidity II: The Chinese Saga

Quote:
Large protests erupted at Carrefour stores in at least five Chinese cities Friday night and Saturday. Carrefour became a target of Chinese anger after rumors spread online that LVMH, the luxury goods company and largest single shareholder in Carrefour, had given money to the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader who China accuses of organizing the Tibetan protests and disrupting the Olympic torch relay. Chinese activists sent a blast of cellphone text messages calling for a May 1 boycott of the retailer, which has more than 100 supercenters in the country.

In an interview published Wednesday in the French daily Le Figaro, LVMH's chief executive, Bernard Arnault, called the rumors "groundless." Carrefour's Chinese arm issued a statement Tuesday saying it "has never, and will not do anything that will hurt the feelings of the Chinese people."

The Chinese media have portrayed Jin as a heroine for protecting the torch from protesters in Paris. But she began attracting criticism online after saying in a television interview that she was unsure about the Carrefour boycott.

There are now calls to boycott Kentucky Fried Chicken, a U.S.-owned chain that is popular here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
pugwall



Joined: 22 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Chinese have totally fucked up PR over this. Beijing is in a PR battle with the Dalai Lama and definitely on the losing end. The foreign minister should be sacked. Stuff like telling CNN to apologise is exactly the kind of stuff the makes the Chinese look like reactionary nutters and cause the kind of Sinophobia that is prevalent in the Western press. They have no understanding of how the West thinks or how stupid they sound.

To call China totalitarian is silly and the kind of hyperbole that the Chinese are getting so hysterical about. China is an authortitarian single party state and people are getting more freedoms all the time if not slowly. Until the West starts accepting how China is changing and stops seeing them as 1970's Mao/red guard/ red menace China then its going to be hard to have any proper dialogue between the two poles. However that is getting hard to do in the wake of these recent mental Carrefor boycotts and human flesh search engines. Hopefully the Olympics go without hitch and everything calms down and things continue progressing slowly as before.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Julius wrote:
I've just been chatting with my (ex) g/f in China.

She's "outraged" that foreigners think Tibet should be independent. "Tibet is China, they are a minority" etc rants.
Chinese are even more brainwashed than koreans I believe. Both are countries where there has been only one official viewpoint presented for sooooo long that they can only think one way. Rolling Eyes


Yes, the Chinese are brainwashed, etc, etc, etc.

I don't know. As an American, I'm kind of glad we took the land we did from Mexico and the natives. I'm sure Canadians feel the same way about land taken from the natives.

Tibet will never be free. Its too important geopolitically to China. Do you think China is going to allow an independent Tibet to increase Indian influence bordering on China's heartland? I don't think so.

However, Tibetan rights are in disrepair, and something needs to be done about that. I support an autonomous Tibet, where Tibetans can monitor Chinese colonization of their lands and enjoy the advantages other Chinese minorities enjoy.

As for China, I'm not convinced that if it were a democracy, it wouldn't be acting in the same way. The territorial addition of Tibet seems less controversial than allegations of colonisaton, which threaten to subsume Tibetan culture. To me, China's relations abroad, with the Sudan, Burma, and Zimbabwe, are more scandalous than their acquisition of Tibet.

At least Mongolia is still free.


Edit:

Protest Stupidity II: The Chinese Saga

Quote:
Large protests erupted at Carrefour stores in at least five Chinese cities Friday night and Saturday. Carrefour became a target of Chinese anger after rumors spread online that LVMH, the luxury goods company and largest single shareholder in Carrefour, had given money to the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader who China accuses of organizing the Tibetan protests and disrupting the Olympic torch relay. Chinese activists sent a blast of cellphone text messages calling for a May 1 boycott of the retailer, which has more than 100 supercenters in the country.

In an interview published Wednesday in the French daily Le Figaro, LVMH's chief executive, Bernard Arnault, called the rumors "groundless." Carrefour's Chinese arm issued a statement Tuesday saying it "has never, and will not do anything that will hurt the feelings of the Chinese people."

The Chinese media have portrayed Jin as a heroine for protecting the torch from protesters in Paris. But she began attracting criticism online after saying in a television interview that she was unsure about the Carrefour boycott.

There are now calls to boycott Kentucky Fried Chicken, a U.S.-owned chain that is popular here.


Chinese nationalism is creepy though. Have you gone to any discussions about Tibet? Have you talked to any Chinese about it? You're in for a real treat. I mean I heard one guy say that the only reason Mongolia is independent is because of Stalin; it should be a part of China. I'm sure Mongolians would really appreciate hearing that.

I have some really bright Chinese classmates but when the topic of China comes up, watch out... They stick right to the party line.

Yes, I know there are Americans that act in similar fashion, but they generally aren't found in IR programs. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The major problem in China and China's relations with the outside world is its ethnocentrism, the Chinese belief that China represents the universe's center and those of us who fall outside of it are barbarians, partly from which its nationalism emerges. One sees this to a lesser degree in South Korea, too, especially regards Koreans' use of the word "foreigner."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Julius wrote:
I've just been chatting with my (ex) g/f in China.

She's "outraged" that foreigners think Tibet should be independent. "Tibet is China, they are a minority" etc rants.
Chinese are even more brainwashed than koreans I believe. Both are countries where there has been only one official viewpoint presented for sooooo long that they can only think one way. Rolling Eyes


Yes, the Chinese are brainwashed, etc, etc, etc.

I don't know. As an American, I'm kind of glad we took the land we did from Mexico and the natives. I'm sure Canadians feel the same way about land taken from the natives.

Tibet will never be free. Its too important geopolitically to China. Do you think China is going to allow an independent Tibet to increase Indian influence bordering on China's heartland? I don't think so.

However, Tibetan rights are in disrepair, and something needs to be done about that. I support an autonomous Tibet, where Tibetans can monitor Chinese colonization of their lands and enjoy the advantages other Chinese minorities enjoy.

As for China, I'm not convinced that if it were a democracy, it wouldn't be acting in the same way. The territorial addition of Tibet seems less controversial than allegations of colonisaton, which threaten to subsume Tibetan culture. To me, China's relations abroad, with the Sudan, Burma, and Zimbabwe, are more scandalous than their acquisition of Tibet.

At least Mongolia is still free.


Edit:

Protest Stupidity II: The Chinese Saga

Quote:
Large protests erupted at Carrefour stores in at least five Chinese cities Friday night and Saturday. Carrefour became a target of Chinese anger after rumors spread online that LVMH, the luxury goods company and largest single shareholder in Carrefour, had given money to the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader who China accuses of organizing the Tibetan protests and disrupting the Olympic torch relay. Chinese activists sent a blast of cellphone text messages calling for a May 1 boycott of the retailer, which has more than 100 supercenters in the country.

In an interview published Wednesday in the French daily Le Figaro, LVMH's chief executive, Bernard Arnault, called the rumors "groundless." Carrefour's Chinese arm issued a statement Tuesday saying it "has never, and will not do anything that will hurt the feelings of the Chinese people."

The Chinese media have portrayed Jin as a heroine for protecting the torch from protesters in Paris. But she began attracting criticism online after saying in a television interview that she was unsure about the Carrefour boycott.

There are now calls to boycott Kentucky Fried Chicken, a U.S.-owned chain that is popular here.


Chinese nationalism is creepy though. Have you gone to any discussions about Tibet? Have you talked to any Chinese about it? You're in for a real treat. I mean I heard one guy say that the only reason Mongolia is independent is because of Stalin; it should be a part of China. I'm sure Mongolians would really appreciate hearing that.

I have some really bright Chinese classmates but when the topic of China comes up, watch out... They stick right to the party line.

Yes, I know there are Americans that act in similar fashion, but they generally aren't found in IR programs. Very Happy


My Chinese friends from Beijing are all riled up. I explain to them that I sympathize, but they simply cannot buy just anything they hear. They took the Carrefour bait hook, line, and sinker.

As to Mongolia, 'the only reason Mongolia is independent is because of Stalin' is generally the consensus, both within Mongolia and within Beijing. My g/f's father is an old intellectual (a scientist) who raised her during the tail-end of the Cultural Revolution. Although he was tortured by the CCP, he still embodies the full nationalist spirit, through and through. He said exactly what your acquaintance said. Remember that in Inner Mongolia, the Mongols living there are one of the many minorities.

The Mongols themselves are grateful to the Russians. On a hill overlooking Ulan-Batoor, there's a large memorial to Soviet-Mongolian co-operation. Its a kind of open air pseudo-Greco-Roman temple featuring Mongolian and Soviet co-operation. The Soviets saved the Mongols' asses, and the Mongols recognize it. Now, the Mongols look to the US and Japan for patronage from the Near threat of China.

My general feeling is that the Europeans come out looking like sanctimonious asses on this one. Are they right? Yes, just like with Iraq, they are right. That doesn't help the fact that their mode of expression is fruitless and counter-productive. I also feel that the Chinese will have Tibet. If they can't have Taiwan, they are not going to give up Tibet because Westerners disapprove.

The Dalai Lama is the man I look towards in this situation. He just wants Tibetans to have civil rights and ideally autonomy. I think thats fine. If the Chinese want to place spies in Tibet to blunt Indian influence, thats fine, too. And knowing how big a tourist draw Tibet is WITHIN China among Chinese, the CCP has a vested interest in preserving Tibetan cultural autonomy, if not political autonomy. So I think there's a middle ground that can be approached by both sides.

Gopher wrote:
The major problem in China and China's relations with the outside world is its ethnocentrism, the Chinese belief that China represents the universe's center and those of us who fall outside of it are barbarians, partly from which its nationalism emerges.


This is true, and sadly, it hasn't changed since the weak Qing Emperors tried to force the British to kowtow. The Opium War and treaty period, instead of teaching China perspective on their power, has fostered resentment against Westerners. This has everything to do with Mao's teachings and CCP exploitation of foreign events to foster nationalist sentiment. I can't help that if Sun-Yat Sen's gov't had survived, and that dipshit Chiang Kai-Shek hadn't ruined everything with his greed, that China today would have a different outlook. As it is, Chinese sentiment remains barricaded behind a Great Wall of nationalism. From within the long stretch of battlements, it looks upon all as barbarians, Westerners and fellow Asians alike. China's only possible friend seems to be Russia, which has always been quite shrewd in diplomatic manipulation of the Chinese. Indeed, Russia was the only power during the Qing period to achieve Chinese recognition as an equal power, and the only power to avoid tributory designation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
pugwall



Joined: 22 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Kuros"]
bucheon bum wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Julius wrote:
I've just been chatting with my (ex) g/f in China.

She's "outraged" that foreigners think Tibet should be independent. "Tibet is China, they are a minority" etc rants.
Chinese are even more brainwashed than koreans I believe. Both are countries where there has been only one official viewpoint presented for sooooo long that they can only think one way. Rolling Eyes


Yes, the Chinese are brainwashed, etc, etc, etc.

I don't know. As an American, I'm kind of glad we took the land we did from Mexico and the natives. I'm sure Canadians feel the same way about land taken from the natives.

Tibet will never be free. Its too important geopolitically to China. Do you think China is going to allow an independent Tibet to increase Indian influence bordering on China's heartland? I don't think so.

However, Tibetan rights are in disrepair, and something needs to be done about that. I support an autonomous Tibet, where Tibetans can monitor Chinese colonization of their lands and enjoy the advantages other Chinese minorities enjoy.

As for China, I'm not convinced that if it were a democracy, it wouldn't be acting in the same way. The territorial addition of Tibet seems less controversial than allegations of colonisaton, which threaten to subsume Tibetan culture. To me, China's relations abroad, with the Sudan, Burma, and Zimbabwe, are more scandalous than their acquisition of Tibet.

At least Mongolia is still free.


Edit:

Protest Stupidity II: The Chinese Saga

Quote:
Large protests erupted at Carrefour stores in at least five Chinese cities Friday night and Saturday. Carrefour became a target of Chinese anger after rumors spread online that LVMH, the luxury goods company and largest single shareholder in Carrefour, had given money to the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader who China accuses of organizing the Tibetan protests and disrupting the Olympic torch relay. Chinese activists sent a blast of cellphone text messages calling for a May 1 boycott of the retailer, which has more than 100 supercenters in the country.

In an interview published Wednesday in the French daily Le Figaro, LVMH's chief executive, Bernard Arnault, called the rumors "groundless." Carrefour's Chinese arm issued a statement Tuesday saying it "has never, and will not do anything that will hurt the feelings of the Chinese people."

The Chinese media have portrayed Jin as a heroine for protecting the torch from protesters in Paris. But she began attracting criticism online after saying in a television interview that she was unsure about the Carrefour boycott.

There are now calls to boycott Kentucky Fried Chicken, a U.S.-owned chain that is popular here.


Chinese nationalism is creepy though. Have you gone to any discussions about Tibet? Have you talked to any Chinese about it? You're in for a real treat. I mean I heard one guy say that the only reason Mongolia is independent is because of Stalin; it should be a part of China. I'm sure Mongolians would really appreciate hearing that.

I have some really bright Chinese classmates but when the topic of China comes up, watch out... They stick right to the party line.

Yes, I know there are Americans that act in similar fashion, but they generally aren't found in IR programs. Very Happy





My general feeling is that the Europeans come out looking like sanctimonious asses on this one. Are they right? Yes, just like with Iraq, they are right. That doesn't help the fact that their mode of expression is fruitless and counter-productive. I also feel that the Chinese will have Tibet. If they can't have Taiwan, they are not going to give up Tibet because Westerners disapprove.

The Dalai Lama is the man I look towards in this situation. He just wants Tibetans to have civil rights and ideally autonomy. I think thats fine. If the Chinese want to place spies in Tibet to blunt Indian influence, thats fine, too. And knowing how big a tourist draw Tibet is WITHIN China among Chinese, the CCP has a vested interest in preserving Tibetan cultural autonomy, if not political autonomy. So I think there's a middle ground that can be approached by both sides.




I agree with you here. The Olympic relay and everything surrounding it has been an absolute disaster for everyone involved. It mostly comes down to total ineptness in cross cultural communications. Beijing just does not know how to present itself to the West and the language and manner in which they deal with problems present them as Maoesque totalitarian automotons and insults our core sensibilities.

On the other hand even a passive observer could have told you that visible protests in the climate of olympic excitement was going to result in terrible consequences. Some people have been working with human rights in China have called the protests a total disaster and have set back any progress. They have played into Beijings hands and this display of nationalism and general mentalness is the product of the protests. What people don't realise is that a lot of the current leaders and people of influence in BJ are the more liberal and open party members such as Hu Jintao whose open policies of the last ten years have brought a lot of gain. The problem is now that a lot of the hardliners of which there are many are coming out the wordwork and having their voices heard. That is not good for anyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pugwall



Joined: 22 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
The major problem in China and China's relations with the outside world is its ethnocentrism, the Chinese belief that China represents the universe's center and those of us who fall outside of it are barbarians, partly from which its nationalism emerges.


This is true, and sadly, it hasn't changed since the weak Qing Emperors tried to force the British to kowtow. The Opium War and treaty period, instead of teaching China perspective on their power, has fostered resentment against Westerners. This has everything to do with Mao's teachings and CCP exploitation of foreign events to foster nationalist sentiment. I can't help that if Sun-Yat Sen's gov't had survived, and that dipshit Chiang Kai-Shek hadn't ruined everything with his greed, that China today would have a different outlook. As it is, Chinese sentiment remains barricaded behind a Great Wall of nationalism. From within the long stretch of battlements, it looks upon all as barbarians, Westerners and fellow Asians alike. China's only possible friend seems to be Russia, which has always been quite shrewd in diplomatic manipulation of the Chinese. Indeed, Russia was the only power during the Qing period to achieve Chinese recognition as an equal power, and the only power to avoid tributory designation.[/quote]

I don't think thats right. Chinas nationalism hasnt been constant. From the fall of the Qing to 1949 their was a lot of anti China feeling and nearly every Chinese intellectual was critical of China, its culture and even history. Apeing western lifestyles and posessions was all the rage.

Also Sun Yatsens governement was always bound to fail. China was not ready for democracy then as it probably is not now. In the first Chinese election the winner Song Jiaoren was shot straight afterwards because he made his competitor lose face. Best would have been if China kept a constitutional emperor like Japan and gradually moved towards more modern practices. But what do I know anyway. I just really really hope this blows over because it really seems that there is a new red guard appearing on the horizon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Julius



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 4:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Julius wrote:
I've just been chatting with my (ex) g/f in China.

She's "outraged" that foreigners think Tibet should be independent. "Tibet is China, they are a minority" etc rants.
Chinese are even more brainwashed than koreans I believe. Both are countries where there has been only one official viewpoint presented for sooooo long that they can only think one way. Rolling Eyes


Yes, the Chinese are brainwashed, etc, etc, etc.

I don't know. As an American, I'm kind of glad we took the land we did from Mexico and the natives. I'm sure Canadians feel the same way about land taken from the natives.


Totally, I totally agree- westerners have a dark past but now they have eliminated the native threat they feel entitled to spearhead the enlightened anticolonial approach...

Btw one more thing she said is that..."China does not want korea. Nobody wants Korea". Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Summer Wine



Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Location: Next to a River

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I mean I heard one guy say that the only reason Mongolia is independent is because of Stalin; it should be a part of China. I'm sure Mongolians would really appreciate hearing that.


I read a book when I was a kid called "the last emperor of Mongolia" and it was an autobiography of a person who claimed to have been the leader of Mongolia.

The USSR moved in and started annexing part of Mongolia and so he appealed for protection by the Chinese. They then took over controling Mongolia and it stopped the USSR taking any more.

Though the long term result was that China annexed his mongolia and its now called inner mongolia and the mongolia the USSR took has now got independence and is the only country known as Mongolia.

He and his country sure got the wrong end of that stick. It was a long time ago but it really does make you cautious of seeking Chinese assistance, especially if you are a neighbor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International