Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Transcription is pure hell... discuss its relevance

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:01 pm    Post subject: Transcription is pure hell... discuss its relevance Reply with quote

I am currently taking a linguistics course for my MA.Ed/TESOL, and having to transcribe words into phonetic symbols.

It's sick and wrong that some people enjoy doing this for a living.

Oh gawd, this sucks!

I'm not sure how relevant this is, other than it can help me to identify student speech errors, and could possibly help me figure out ways to correct them.

My MA/TESOL class was easy until we reached this unit!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Khyron



Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phonetic symbols are a waste of time. In over 3 years of teaching English, I've never once used them. Students have never asked about them unless it was part of a lesson in their textbook, in which case I just told them not to worry about those silly symbols.

The only place they seem to be used is in TESOL courses and the like, which is rather pointless, and by textbook authors who want to justify having wasting so much time memorizing them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hugekebab



Joined: 05 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Khyron wrote:
Phonetic symbols are a waste of time. In over 3 years of teaching English, I've never once used them. Students have never asked about them unless it was part of a lesson in their textbook, in which case I just told them not to worry about those silly symbols.

The only place they seem to be used is in TESOL courses and the like, which is rather pointless, and by textbook authors who want to justify having wasting so much time memorizing them.


Phonetic symbols are the masturbation fodder of 40 something CELTA trainers who want to demonstrate to the world that they completed a DELTA course and are therefore better at teaching and more advanced than you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wayfarer



Joined: 05 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the alleged justification is that IPA assists pronunciation because written English gives one no clue how a new word is pronounced, whereas IPA is consistent and students can refer to it if they have difficulty getting the pronunciation right only by listening. I've never used it but I think it could be useful for self-motivated adult students. Wouldn't want to use it all the time, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whistleblower



Joined: 03 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Take some time and look in any advanced learner's dictionary, phonemes are present. Introduce some phonemes to students with flashcards and words and get them to match the correct phonemes for the word. Good game that.

Use the following website to resources about phonetics, flash cards and games that can be used with an interactive whiteboard or powerpoint.

http://www.cambridgeenglishonline.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrsquirrel



Joined: 13 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does that mean all American MA TESOL courses teach British English?

From my understanding there isn't a stanadard phonemic alphabet in the US (actually two) or has this changed?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is great for younger students:

http://bogglesworldesl.com/elkonin_boxes.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
talika



Joined: 30 May 2008

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mrsquirrel wrote:
Does that mean all American MA TESOL courses teach British English?

From my understanding there isn't a stanadard phonemic alphabet in the US (actually two) or has this changed?


I think IPA is the standard. But countries like Britain, Canada, and America uses different phonemes for different pronunciations, for example: 'about', 'water' , etc,.


Transcribing can be "fun" in a twisted way. Razz
But I'll never study linguistics again. I loath SCHWA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International