View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:49 am Post subject: Electoral College: O 338- M 200 (Updated 11/4) |
|
|
Need to win: 270 of the 538 total (435 Representatives, 100 Senators +3 for DC)
Real Clear Politics calls the race this way according to their average of poll standings:
Obama has 228 electoral votes sewed up (a lead of more than 10%) (needs 42 more)
(45 of his votes are coming from states that are leaning�a spread of 5.0 to 10%)
McCain has 185 electoral votes sewed up (a lead of more than 10%).(needs 85 more)
(37 of his votes are coming from states that are leaning�a spread of 5.0 to 10%)
That�s 413 electoral votes out of play (if you consider the states that are leaning to be out of play)
.
That leaves 125 up for grabs.
The 10 Battleground States Obama McCain Spread
(a spread of under 5%)
Colorado (9) 45.2 44.8 Obama +0.4
Nevada (5) 44.3 45.3 McCain +1.0
Michigan (17) 46.0 41.7 Obama +4.3
Ohio (20) 43.3 44.5 McCain +1.2
Florida (27) 43.2 46.3 McCain +3.1
Virginia (13) 46.0 46.0 0
New Mexico (5) 47.3 43.0 Obama +4.3
New Hampshire (4) 44.0 43.7 Obama +0.3
Minnesota (10) 47.5 43.0 Obama +4.5
North Carolina (15) 42.8 47.0 McCain +4.2
These Battleground States have a total of 125 electoral votes.
There are 7 more states rated at Leaning (One candidate has a lead of more than 5% but less than 10%.
Pennsylvania (21) 47.4 42.4 Obama +5.0
Iowa (7) 49.3 44.0 Obama +5.3
Indiana (11) 42.0 48.7 McCain +6.7
Missouri (11) 42.7 49.7 McCain +7.0
Wisconsin (10) 48.0 40.8 Obama +7.2
Oregon (7) 48.7 41.7 Obama +7.0
Georgia (15) 43.7 50.0 McCain +6.3
Obama has the lead in states with 45 electoral votes
McCain has the lead in states with 37 electoral votes.
If you add in the Battleground States using the leads as they now exist, it would be Obama 273 and McCain 265.
Last edited by Ya-ta Boy on Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:44 pm; edited 32 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think it will be that close. When it comes down to it, a lot of people are going to want to be able to say they voted for the historic change but they won't see McCain/Palin as historic enough. Second banana just isn't good enough. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting analysis, especially when you add in the following for the battleground states:
Colorado (9) 2000 (R), 2004 (R)
Nevada (5) 2000 (R), 2004 (R)
Michigan (17) 2000 (D), 2004 (D)
Ohio (20) 2000 (D), 2004 (D)
Florida (27) 2000 (R), 2004 (R)
Virginia (13) 2000 (R), 2004 (R)
New Mexico (5) 2000 (D), 2004 (R)
New Hampshire (4) 2000 (R), 2004 (D)
Minnesota (10) 2000 (D), 2004 (D)
North Carolina (15) 2000 (R), 2004 (R)
With the exception NH and NM, each of the other 8 states have consistently gone one way or the other.
The Republicans are playing defense in a good number of those states. Bush won 5 electoral votes in 2000 and 25 in 2004, neither one is a landslide. In either case one or two states flipped would have changed the election. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Obama should be winning either Ohio or Florida. Absent that, its too early to get complacent.
NH, NM, and NC are beyond the statistical error at this point, but you have to fight hard for Ohio and Florida. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
contrarian
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Location: Nearly in NK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Palin as the VP pick and cancelling part of the Republican convention because of the hurricane is going to be a big boost for the Republicans. Among other things Palin revitalized the religious right for the Republicans. There is a core of 25% of the US that simply will not vote for a black. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Conty, have you been following the news on Palin? I don't think McCain's people did enough research.
And why would the lack of coverage of the Rep convention be a boost? Obama got a serious numbers for his speech, that's proof a number of people were interested in hearing what he had to say, and given it was a good speech he probably won some converts. McCain would need to do the same, but he might not have a chance. How is that a good thing? And if it is a good thing, what does that say about Reps? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I notice two things about the list of battleground/leaning states.
Virginia, North Carolina and Georgia are now emerging as two-party states where the outcome is not automatic. Maybe the Civil War is finally over?
The Midwestern States are (mainly) where the final deciding votes will be cast: Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa and Missouri. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would be shocked if Iowa doesn't go Obama, and we're pretty damn white. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
contrarian
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Location: Nearly in NK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ESL teachers with liberal arts educations are notoriously biased on left - right issues. Can't see the trees for the forest.
North Carolina (I lived there for two years a long time back) is old confederacy and not as bi-racial as many might hope. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ernie
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Location: asdfghjk
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
didn't ohio vote republican in 2000 and 2004? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ernie wrote: |
didn't ohio vote republican in 2000 and 2004? |
yes. A republican hasn't won an election w/out Ohio since, well.. It has been over 100 years I believe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
contrarian wrote: |
Palin as the VP pick and cancelling part of the Republican convention because of the hurricane is going to be a big boost for the Republicans. Among other things Palin revitalized the religious right for the Republicans. There is a core of 25% of the US that simply will not vote for a black. |
They might vote for Keyes. Then again, maybe without knowing that he is black. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a link to a map that Kuros posted on another thread. It is FAR more favorable to Obama than what Real Clear Politics has posted with Obama at 293 and McCain at 227.
With the VeePs lined up in both parties and the conventions over, the numbers in several of the battleground states and leaning states should begin to clarify.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
W.T.Carl
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Obama overpolls by about 6%. Haven't you heard of the Bradley effect? Do the math. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keep grasping at that straw. Maybe it will keep your head above water until November 4. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|