Korean Job Discussion Forums

[MrRogers]

something to consider

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/25/world/asia/25korea.html?_r=1&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print

September 25, 2008

N. Korea Bars Inspectors From Nuclear Plant
By ELAINE SCIOLINO

PARIS � North Korea has barred international inspectors from its nuclear reprocessing plant and intends to begin introducing nuclear material to the plant in a week, the International Atomic Energy Agency said on Wednesday.

The decision by North Korea comes as the Vienna-based nuclear agency also announced it had completed on Wednesday the removal of all seals and surveillance cameras from the reprocessing plant, one of several sites at its vast Yongbyon nuclear complex. The removal was carried out following a formal request to the agency by the North two days ago.

The decision by the North is a serious setback both for the Bush administration and an international nuclear disarmament agreement that was aimed at dismantling North Korea�s nuclear weapons program.

The move comes amid uncertainty about the country following reports that the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il, has been seriously ill, and was clear evidence that the North plans to restart the plant, which processes spent nuclear fuel rods to produce plutonium for use in nuclear weapons. �There are no more seals and surveillance equipment in place at the reprocessing facility,� I.A.E.A. spokeswoman Melissa Fleming told reporters at the agency�s headquarters in Vienna.

She added that the North Koreans �also informed I.A.E.A. inspectors that they plan to introduce nuclear material to the reprocessing plant in one week�s time. They further stated that from here on, I.A.E.A. inspectors will have no further access to the reprocessing plant.�

The decision means that within a week North Korea could start processing spent nuclear fuel rods to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons. It is estimated to have 5,000 spent fuel rods, enough to produce between 6 and 15 kilograms of plutonium or between 1 and 3 bombs.

While the request to remove the seals and surveillance equipment had been anticipated, the nuclear agency, the United States and the other governments involved in delicate diplomacy with the North Koreans had hoped that they would not begin operations there again and that inspectors would still have access to the facility.

More ominously, the move suggests that the North may be preparing to restart its nuclear weapons program at a time when the United States is distracted by the financial crisis, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and unrest in Pakistan.

The decision by North Korea is dangerous because the reprocessing of nuclear fuel from spent fuel rods can begin within months, according to arms control experts. It would take years, by contrast, for North Korea to produce fresh nuclear fuel if it decided to restart its nuclear reactor which is also on the complex at Yongbyon.

The announcement of the decision was first made by Olli Heinonen, the I.A.E.A.�s deputy director general and head of the department of safeguards, to a closed meeting of the agency�s 35-country board of governors which is meeting in Vienna this week.

In prepared remarks at the meeting, Gregory L. Schulte, the chief American envoy to the I.A.E.A., on Wednesday called North Korea�s move �unsettling.� He added, �We are working in close consultation with our six-party partners to determine the best way forward.�

Although they are now barred from the reprocessing plant, inspectors remain elsewhere at the Yongbyon site, but North Korea has not told the nuclear agency whether the small permanent group of inspectors will be allowed to stay at the Yongbyon complex and whether they will continue to have access to other buildings there, a European official linked to the agency said.

The inspectors have worked there, living in guest quarters on the site, since July 2007.

The United States, Russia, Japan, China and South Korea have been engaged with North Korea in prolonged six-country negotiations, which produced an agreement in February 2007 for North Korea to abandon its nuclear activities in exchange for aid and diplomatic incentives.

In July 2007, North Korea told the United States that it had shut down its nuclear reactor at the Yongbyon facility and readmitted an international inspection team.

The move completed the first step toward reversing a four-year confrontation with the United States during which North Korea had made fuel for a small but potent arsenal of nuclear weapons.

The shutdown of the reactor and the return of the inspectors allowed the Bush administration to claim that its strategy of rejecting the North�s calls for bilateral talks and insisting on negotiations that included North Korea�s neighbors finally was working.

Since last November, North Korea had been dismantling the massive complex under the complicated disarmament-for-aid agreement.

But last month, North Korea announced that it had stopped dismantling the facilities to protest the failure of the United States to remove it from its list of state sponsors of terrorism.

Amid reports that Mr. Kim was ill, North Korea seemed to harden its position last Friday, saying that it no longer wanted to be removed from the terrorism list. �We can go our own way,� a Foreign Ministry official was quoted as saying.

Officially, Washington has said that it will remove North Korea from the list after it permits inspectors to verify claims about its production of nuclear weapons.

[wylies99]

Looks like another nuke crisis is about to begin.

[MrRogers]

yes...

perhaps THE reason to get out of here

[sojourner1]

The dorky Norks are at it again. It's kind of interesting to see them as Korea's other half. Had it not been for Americas intervention, the entire one Korea would be a communist regime oppressing it's people like the North does. Quite sick.

[spliff]

Something to consider is that this is good timing for the "W" administration....BRING IT!

If u play w/ fire u may well get burnt.

[semi-fly]

I'd imagine it has something to do with the changing of guard coming up in a few months. They are testing the waters, blah, blah, blah you know the drill. It happens whenever a new president takes office.

[MrRogers]

considering also the reality of the past...

and devastation...

Seoul:
http://z.about.com/d/asianhistory/1/0/k/1/-/-/WomenkidsSeoulscroungingfuelNov11950.jpg

[wylies99]

Actually, if the communists start lobbing nukes, it'd probably be in the direction of Japan.

But we're in the middle!

[MrRogers]

if any nukes were "lobed" it doesn't matter where you are, radiation/fallout hits everywhere, depending on how much is released ... plus air streams

a U.S. nuclear warship just pulled into a harbor in Japan (along with much protest from the Japanese) ... why at this time? Is it getting ready to do something?...like launch a nuke over to you know where? More Bush antagonism/devastation?

something to consider...where one is living

[blaseblasphemener]

bomb them into the stone age.

[spliff]

The USS George Washington is a nuclear-powered U.S. aircraft carrier. It doesn't carry nukes. Also, the carrier is brand new and it has been scheduled to deploy to it's new home base in Japan for quite some time now.

[Zolt]

US Nuclear subs and carriers make port calls in Japan all the time, just routine.

On the other hand the fact that the north can get the plant back up and running so quickly casts some serious doubts about how real those deactivation and scuttling operations were.

Time for the next US prez to bring the boys back from Iraq and come play ball here... No rush however, cause even if the norks have working nukes, which I still doubt, they don't have anything but a few cranky and out of fuel bombers to deliver them.

[MrRogers]

Spliff wrote:

[MrRogers]