|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
EzeWong

Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:26 pm Post subject: A problem: Getting Students to SPEAK |
|
|
I've relied on rewards trying to get students to speak. Both short and long term (stickers for a prize or just candy)
The kids raise their hands and respond to phrases like "what's up".
I thought it was working but now I see a sudden drop in participation even despite the easier material.
As a PS school teacher my most important goal is to have the students speaking. breaking them up into groups and pairs doesn't seem to work because of discipline problems. Games get mostly out of hand because they scream and yell whatever they know in English or start speaking Korean.
I'm wondering if anyone has any good solutions to my problem. This is under the assumption they are complete monsters and have the attention span of a raisin.
I've contemplated many possible other pairings but I can't think of a good conceivable one without having to experiement extensively...
...
...
... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fishead soup
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lots of people on this board are gonna bite my head off for saying this
because it goes against the current Edutainmenttrend. I think for now you should do lots of drilling(Choral Repetition) in a military kind of way. Also let the kids know that if they misbehave the class is going to be boring. When and if either their behavour or their speaking ability gets better you might try something more creative. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In a big group it is better to write out some conversations, and let them "parrot" it out loud with the one sitting next to them.
Try to make it funny, and first do it yourself, with another chosen classmate.
Then they have to do them between themselves.
Or you could take a conversation of a movie scene, show the scene, and then let the students re-enact it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xCustomx

Joined: 06 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You have the same problem as probably 95% of public school teachers. The large class sizes make it difficult, but you should experiment and see what works well for you.
Usually I have to teach the speaking portion of the textbook, but that doesn't help me. What I do is find the topic, theme, or grammar point for that lesson and then develop something on my own. This is my second year at a middle school, and even though I have tons of resources that I've gathered together, I'm always having problems finding new and fun ways to help the students speak more.
Today I had a lesson on directions. We focused on 4 sets of words: Take, transfer, get off, from....to. I explained what the words mean in Korean. Then I wrote a sample dialogue to help them. I showed a picture of the Seoul Subway line. I would pick different subway stations on the map and have students give me the directions on how to get to different places. "How do I get to Gangnam station from Apgujeong?" After several examples, the students began to understand. Then I gave a worksheet that has a map with subway and bus lines. Student A has locations 1,3,5,7...etc marked on their map. Student B has the even numbered locations marked. They are supposed to give directions to each other to be able to locate all the places on the map.
When they finished, I called on students to provide the answers.
This lesson is by no means perfect, but I was happy that 70% of the students completed the activity and as I walked around to help, most of them were speaking in English
If your students aren't speaking, that could be their fault, but I think the teacher is part of the problem as well. The more time you spend in the class, the more you'll start to understand what will and won't work. This will affect the lessons that you make. I try to make my demonstrations and explanations as easy as possible. I don't want to keep rambling, but once you get more experience things will get easier. Good luck |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Easter Clark

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Location: Hiding from Yie Eun-woong
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fishead soup wrote: |
Lots of people on this board are gonna bite my head off for saying this
because it goes against the current Edutainmenttrend. I think for now you should do lots of drilling(Choral Repetition) in a military kind of way. Also let the kids know that if they misbehave the class is going to be boring. When and if either their behavour or their speaking ability gets better you might try something more creative. |
I tend to agree if it's a large classroom. I think the Communicative or Task-Based approaches are great in theory, and work well for small groups and with motivated learners. However, if the students lack the maturity to see the value of an activity or the discipline to follow instructions, (or if you have a small classroom and too many students) then drilling or simple gap-fills is about all that's left. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xCustomx

Joined: 06 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Easter Clark wrote: |
However, if the students lack the maturity to see the value of an activity or the discipline to follow instructions, (or if you have a small classroom and too many students) then drilling or simple gap-fills is about all that's left. |
Do you really feel like that's the best you can do? I hate to see teachers give up on students, though I completely understand why someone might want to. I have had several classes that I hated to teach, but that didn't mean that I prepared any less for them than I would a normal class that I liked. If you're only providing a drilling exercise or gap fill, then yeah, they aren't going to see any value. Even if you're only reaching 30 or 40% of the students, that's still a better job than giving up on 100% of them |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Easter Clark

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Location: Hiding from Yie Eun-woong
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xCustomx wrote: |
Do you really feel like that's the best you can do? I hate to see teachers give up on students, though I completely understand why someone might want to. I have had several classes that I hated to teach, but that didn't mean that I prepared any less for them than I would a normal class that I liked. If you're only providing a drilling exercise or gap fill, then yeah, they aren't going to see any value. Even if you're only reaching 30 or 40% of the students, that's still a better job than giving up on 100% of them |
Some sound advice there, I admit. 30-40%? I wish...more like 3-4%.
I don't hate teaching any of my classes. I love the profession and I like my students as people. It's just disheartening when one approaches their teaching communicatively and the students respond better to the ol' drill-and-kill. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Lots of people on this board are gonna bite my head off for saying this
because it goes against the current Edutainmenttrend. I think for now you should do lots of drilling(Choral Repetition) in a military kind of way. |
Consider your head bit off and spat out
Just boggles my mind that any teacher, with any kind of training or wits about them - could ever consider this a) teaching b) effective.
Repeating should occur only a) when students first encounter a word (for specific pronunciation b) if there is some pronunciation difficulty. Other than that, it is just killing class time.
If you have a class like the OP's and you've done everything but it still won't work (communicative teaching) then self-study is the answer. Otherwise, if you are teaching the whole class, you have to better model what is expected of students, gain better classroom management skills, set and communicate better - the consequences for off task behavior, provide more student centered and interesting content, really think through the lesson in terms of classroom dynamics.
My opinion and two cents worth. When I see a teacher say "repeat after me" -- I cringe. It is like the last vestige of any dignity has oozed out of the person..... By the way -- all the research is conclusive (as far as research, ongoing research can be).
I'm sure others will retort, "oh but some learning occurs!" . Of course it does -- something has to happen. But the point is, the time can be much much much better spent and spent in a much much more "human" fashion.
DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EzeWong

Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
This self study thing intrigues me,
If i have all students talking at the same time, someones is definately dicking around
Dialogue pairs don't work: dicking around
row groups don't work: kids in the back row usually don't do anything
Grouped games don't work: only some kids participate.
Korean students are TOO shy... I'm frustrated but I think I can do this.
There has to be some sort of activity or game that will have even the most tame student talking.
I really don't wnat to pick on kids. I hated that when I was in school and that never worked for me.
As for Staff Sargeant, I want them to be interested in the topic, I could drill it into their head, but I want them to have fun... "that's what foreign teachers class is for... fun" as one student told me (lol little scamp I was gonna break his arm hahaha) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eze wong,
You might try this zip zap game that I modified for EFL. Have the students instead of just vocab words, use sentences.
http://www.mediafire.com/file/ymw2zmjyjzy/Zip zap.doc
You might also try a talking stick in their groups/pairs. You have to hold the stick to speak. Cuts down on the chatter and provides some structure.
Simple flashcard games work to help with production and so do simple stand up / walkarounds. Students on a slip of paper write some vocab word as directed by the teacher (ex. month of their birthday, job they want to do when they grow up, favorite X) . They then walk around asking each other (model the correct question ex. When is your birthday?). If they find a match, they lock arms and continue to find all the students who match up. .... Largest group/smallest group can win. you set the criteria... Once they know the walkaround procedure, it works with all topics...
Getting real speaking production takes a lot of teacher skill I believe. You really have to create the proper classroom dynamics and environment...not easy but if a teacher wants ... they can succeed in doing so.
DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tobias

Joined: 02 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:26 am Post subject: The Problem |
|
|
The problem simplified:
1. They enjoy a certain level of esteem (i.e. FACE).
2. They speak and are exposed as not knowing as much as their colleagues believed or their level of esteem warrants.
3. They lose face.
4. They don't speak again.
Want to REALLY piss off a Korean?
A. Pair a PhD with a 7-year old whose English ability smokes the ability of the PhD.
B. Watch PhD disappear from your classes, never to return. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fishead soup
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ddeubel wrote: |
Quote: |
Lots of people on this board are gonna bite my head off for saying this
because it goes against the current Edutainmenttrend. I think for now you should do lots of drilling(Choral Repetition) in a military kind of way. |
Consider your head bit off and spat out
Just boggles my mind that any teacher, with any kind of training or wits about them - could ever consider this a) teaching b) effective.
Repeating should occur only a) when students first encounter a word (for specific pronunciation b) if there is some pronunciation difficulty. Other than that, it is just killing class time.
If you have a class like the OP's and you've done everything but it still won't work (communicative teaching) then self-study is the answer. Otherwise, if you are teaching the whole class, you have to better model what is expected of students, gain better classroom management skills, set and communicate better - the consequences for off task behavior, provide more student centered and interesting content, really think through the lesson in terms of classroom dynamics.
My opinion and two cents worth. When I see a teacher say "repeat after me" -- I cringe. It is like the last vestige of any dignity has oozed out of the person..... By the way -- all the research is conclusive (as far as research, ongoing research can be).
I'm sure others will retort, "oh but some learning occurs!" . Of course it does -- something has to happen. But the point is, the time can be much much much better spent and spent in a much much more "human" fashion.
DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com |
You work in Seoul don't you? Most of the AV equiptment is in good working order and you have a language room. Try working in the sticks for a while. Where you have to go from room to room carrying your laptop
and you have absolutely no idea whether the material you planned will work.
By the way I have used lots of stuff you recommended and I think its great only when I can the##$% working. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Easter Clark

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Location: Hiding from Yie Eun-woong
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I have to choose between a highly structured activity in which 90% of the class participates (reading dialogs or choral drilling) or a loosely structured activity designed to encourage language production using the students' own experiences and interests in which maybe 20% of the class participates...well, I do want to maximize the time spent speaking English...
Fact is, for low-level students who have no interest in learning the language, there is safety in numbers and choral drills afford those numbers. And to the comment about the FTs class being there so the students can "have fun"...I thought the FT's class was for learning and practicing English. You can't please all the people all the time. Sure, try to plan to their interests and do your best to build up their self esteem. But when many of the students decide it's more rewarding for them to sleep or talk to their friends (or, in many cases, face punishment) than participate in your class, try asking yourself what went wrong--and try finding an acceptable answer to that question. Teacher's fault? Maybe. But what can be done? It's so easy to criticize without offering a course of action.
And ddeubel--I have always appreciated your advice and experience. However, I must say that many of your materials aren't geared toward any one level. The range of abilities is all over the place, which makes it too time consuming to modify them or use them in class. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fishead soup
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Easter Clark wrote: |
If I have to choose between a highly structured activity in which 90% of the class participates (reading dialogs or choral drilling) or a loosely structured activity designed to encourage language production using the students' own experiences and interests in which maybe 20% of the class participates...well, I do want to maximize the time spent speaking English...
Fact is, for low-level students who have no interest in learning the language, there is safety in numbers and choral drills afford those numbers. And to the comment about the FTs class being there so the students can "have fun"...I thought the FT's class was for learning and practicing English. You can't please all the people all the time. Sure, try to plan to their interests and do your best to build up their self esteem. But when many of the students decide it's more rewarding for them to sleep or talk to their friends (or, in many cases, face punishment) than participate in your class, try asking yourself what went wrong--and try finding an acceptable answer to that question. Teacher's fault? Maybe. But what can be done? It's so easy to criticize without offering a course of action.
And ddeubel--I have always appreciated your advice and experience. However, I must say that many of your materials aren't geared toward any one level. The range of abilities is all over the place, which makes it too time consuming to modify them or use them in class. |
I have to agree with this. I have some after school classes where I can use information gap activities and role plays. I've got first and second year middle school students going through customs and checking into a hotel. I would really love to do these with my regular 45 plus class. But I know it would flop. Most of the students would just copy from each others papers and ignore the point of the activity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D.D.
Joined: 29 May 2008
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fishead soup wrote: |
Lots of people on this board are gonna bite my head off for saying this
because it goes against the current Edutainmenttrend. I think for now you should do lots of drilling(Choral Repetition) in a military kind of way. Also let the kids know that if they misbehave the class is going to be boring. When and if either their behavour or their speaking ability gets better you might try something more creative. |
I watched Eddie Murphy on T.V. last night and he praised teachers that make funny and interesting classes.
I guess you got stuck in a small part of your brain at some point in your life. It's too bad that you are teaching others to be as narrow and boring as you.
My advice do some art or meditation or learn a musical instrument. You are making students that hate English because you are out of touch with the creative centres in your own brain.
Without those centres activated you would think what others are doing is just edutainment. It's amazing with all the money spent on English leaning that people still teach like you do.
I have primary kids that started at a very basic level speaking quite a bit after 6 months. We have never done military like drills. That is the reason why they are speaking because we actually practice speaking.
What you do is an o.k. short term option that becomes a detriment in the long term. When teaching English we should always ask is our current teaching going to help the student in the long term?
Setting long term goals will keep you from doing things short term that benefit your laziness and lack of creativity.
Short term it is good for the students to struggle and have classes that look like they are not working.
So it's easy if you actually take time to meet the students on their level and expect them to talk to you.
They know quite a bit and they just need a chance to use it. They prefer small groups and a teacher that actually listens. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|