Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

McCain $$ Priorities: Palin's HAIR!!
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:59 pm    Post subject: McCain $$ Priorities: Palin's HAIR!! Reply with quote

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081024/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_money

Quote:
McCain's Oct. 1-15 filing showed that the campaign paid $22,800 to Palin's traveling stylist, Amy Strozzi, an acclaimed celebrity makeup artist. In contrast, McCain's foreign policy adviser, Randy Scheunemann, was paid $12,500, the report showed.


I almost coughed out my glass of water when I read this one. Are you serious? Palin's traveling stylist makes more in two weeks than McCain's foreign policy adviser!

Hahahahaha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Given they are running out of money quickly, you would think they would be putting money into activities which actually get votes.

Of course this is just another mass hysteria left thing. It's not like they ACTUALLY want to win the election, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Hammer



Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Location: Ullungdo 37.5 N, 130.9 E, altitude : 223 m

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, Alaskan Bush is pretty tough to cut, so it seems fair.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuckistan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Location: Training future GS competitors.....

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought the expenses for Nieman Marcus, Saks, and Bloomingdales were excessive. $75,000 in one go? They could have easily spent less and clothed her just as well. Supported struggling American designers for starters.

Valentino is not a great way to connect with hockey moms and Wal Mart ladies. The average American family spends $1,800 a year on clothes.
Cindy McCain's outfit at the convention was estimated to be $300,000 of cloth and bling.

The Repubs are discouragingly clueless while the markets dive and everyone's watching their retirement funds vanish.
But then the white country club crowd just doesn't live in the same reality the rest of us do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
No_hite_pls



Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Location: Don't hate me because I'm right

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hammer wrote:
Well, Alaskan Bush is pretty tough to cut, so it seems fair.


LOL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's the "money makes you funny (in the head) club".

I worked as a kid and into my uni years during school vacations at my brother's classic car auto restoration shop. We worked on only really high-end stuff (Ferraris, 356 Porsches, gull-wing Mercedes, you get the point..).

I met quite a few celebs, some more famous than others (for example Carl Weathers - he had lots of older Rolls Royces, Hall from Hall and Oates fame - huge Ferrari guy, J. Geils from the J. Geils Band - he had some old E-type Jags we worked on), but they all seem to be laid-back guys who would chill out and shoot the shit while having a coffee and a donut. Same with the customers that had become wealthy but had worked their way up from modest beginnings.

Then you had the a-holes who grew up in money and had never worked a day in their lives, nor would they ever have to (and they were obviously well aware of the fact). They were the most difficult, needling, demanding, whiny sons of bitches who expected us to turn their, for instance, 1957 Maserati (which was only 1 of 2 existing in the world, and had been found at the bottom of a lake in Germany and had just been shipped to us) into a diamond in three months because they wanted to show their friends in the Hamptons that summer (true story).

That's the 'money makes you funny club'. I met many of them. Unfortunately, they are constantly rewarded for their bad behavior by virtue of the fact that most people want some of what they have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Who was the highest paid individual in Senator John McCain�s presidential campaign during the first half of October as it headed down the homestretch?

Not Randy Scheunemann, Mr. McCain�s chief foreign policy adviser; not Nicolle Wallace, his senior communications staff member. It was Amy Strozzi, who was identified by the Washington Post this week as Gov. Sarah Palin�s traveling makeup artist, according to a new filing with the Federal Election Commission on Thursday night.

Ms. Strozzi, who was nominated for an Emmy award for her makeup work on the television show �So You Think You Can Dance?�, was paid $22,800 for the first two weeks of October alone, according to the records.

From Andrew Sullivan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cheonmunka



Joined: 04 Jun 2004

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting story Caniff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheonmunka wrote:
Interesting story Caniff.



Yeah, I get a little annoyed just thinking about them pr1cks.

It assauges my feelings knowing that they generally had unattractive shrilly-voiced wives from other 'blue-blood' families in tow.

They are not to be envied. Only pitied.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Democrats spent 5.3 MILLION dollars for the greek stand at the Democratic convention.


Quote:
Convention expenses paid by the committee included $14.1 million for construction costs, including the stage and lighting, at the Pepsi Center and $5.3 million at Invesco Field.


http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2008/10/13/daily43.html




that how the Democrats spend money..

That seems like a lot more money than 23K.


but then again double standards.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Democrats wasted a lot more money than the Republicans.


Yup , this thread is over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Democrats wasted a lot more money than the Republicans.


Yup , this thread is over.


C'mon, Joo. That money was spent for the DNP's CONVENTION. It was 23K for TWO WEEKS (TWO F'IN WEEKS!! Shocked ) of PALIN HAIR-DOO ADJUSTMENT. You can't see the difference?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

caniff wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Democrats wasted a lot more money than the Republicans.


Yup , this thread is over.


C'mon, Joo. That money was spent for the DNP's CONVENTION. It was 23K for TWO WEEKS (TWO F'IN WEEKS!! Shocked ) of PALIN HAIR-DOO ADJUSTMENT. You can't see the difference?


5.3 million for a stage.


23K wasted for show versus 5.3 million for show.

I can see the difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuckistan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Location: Training future GS competitors.....

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
caniff wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Democrats wasted a lot more money than the Republicans.


Yup , this thread is over.


C'mon, Joo. That money was spent for the DNP's CONVENTION. It was 23K for TWO WEEKS (TWO F'IN WEEKS!! Shocked ) of PALIN HAIR-DOO ADJUSTMENT. You can't see the difference?


5.3 million for a stage.


23K wasted for show versus 5.3 million for show.

I can see the difference.



Well Joo, here's my rant.
Democrats handed the country over to George Bush with a healthy economy, balanced budget and very low debt. Bush's father lost over a wrecked economy from 8 years of enriching their wealthy friends with military and oil contracts as well.

8 years of Bush Jr and look where we are now. Same shyte different day. Except the reach of globalization makes this financial crisis much worse.

I'm going to point out again that every single serious market crash the last 80 years has occurred under a Republican admin--without exception.

Anyone seeing a really obvious pattern here?

So when Repubots start going on about Democrats' "wasteful spending" I tend to get disgusted at the worst kind of hypocrisy.

I will always be a Democrat because food to eat and comprehensive health care for the little guy is more important than cutting billion $ deals with country-club friends to make marble bathrooms and $50,000 curtains possible for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th homes. Especially in a country as developed as the US.

But I've long understood that for them spending isn't considered "wasteful" when it's a Republican admin enriching their wealthy friends at the expense of the country's basic financial soundness--and these days everyone's retirement funds.

Republicans election to high office in this country = handing them and their small coterie of friends a golden opportunity to enrich themselves....enthusiastically and without fail while any barriers to pursue these ends are swept aside.

8 years of supporting the profligacy and corruption of a small % of the population....KBR and Haliburton's cosy billion $ no-bid contracts, the list goes on and on.

This does not make me a "socialist" or a "liberal"-- handy labels to justify their consistent $ irresponsibility and malfeasance.
I'm just horrified with this culture of the Republican party. And I haven't even touched upon their even more grossly hypocritical version of "morality" they try to impose on all of us either.
And an underachieving half-wit to lead these last 8 years to boot!

It boggles the mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

canuckistan wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
caniff wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Democrats wasted a lot more money than the Republicans.


Yup , this thread is over.


C'mon, Joo. That money was spent for the DNP's CONVENTION. It was 23K for TWO WEEKS (TWO F'IN WEEKS!! Shocked ) of PALIN HAIR-DOO ADJUSTMENT. You can't see the difference?


5.3 million for a stage.


23K wasted for show versus 5.3 million for show.

I can see the difference.



Well Joo, here's my rant.
Democrats handed the country over to George Bush with a healthy economy, balanced budget and very low debt. Bush's father lost over a wrecked economy from 8 years of enriching their wealthy friends with military and oil contracts as well.

8 years of Bush Jr and look where we are now. Same shyte different day. Except the reach of globalization makes this financial crisis much worse.

I'm going to point out again that every single serious market crash the last 80 years has occurred under a Republican admin--without exception.

Anyone seeing a really obvious pattern here?

So when Repubots start going on about Democrats' "wasteful spending" I tend to get disgusted at the worst kind of hypocrisy.

I will always be a Democrat because food to eat and comprehensive health care for the little guy is more important than cutting billion $ deals with country-club friends to make marble bathrooms and $50,000 curtains possible for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th homes. Especially in a country as developed as the US.

But I've long understood that for them spending isn't considered "wasteful" when it's a Republican admin enriching their wealthy friends at the expense of the country's basic financial soundness--and these days everyone's retirement funds.

Republicans election to high office in this country = handing them and their small coterie of friends a golden opportunity to enrich themselves....enthusiastically and without fail while any barriers to pursue these ends are swept aside.

8 years of supporting the profligacy and corruption of a small % of the population....KBR and Haliburton's cosy billion $ no-bid contracts, the list goes on and on.

This does not make me a "socialist" or a "liberal"-- handy labels to justify their consistent $ irresponsibility and malfeasance.
I'm just horrified with this culture of the Republican party. And I haven't even touched upon their even more grossly hypocritical version of "morality" they try to impose on all of us either.
And an underachieving half-wit to lead these last 8 years to boot!

It boggles the mind.


Here are some Major causes of the deficit:

The 2000 recession -> started before Bush was president

The first stockmarket meltdown -> started before Bush was president.

9-11 attacks -> Planned before Bush was president. The hijackers were in the US before Bush was president.

High oil prices -> Oil dropped to 12 dollars when Clinton was president.

A lot of the subprime lending practices started before Bush was president.

When Clinton was president Russia was down and out.


As I said I voted for Gore in 2000 cause I didn't agree with Bush's tax cuts but there are a lot of well educated people who will tell you that tax cuts increase productivity.

If high taxes are a solution then why is Europe' economic growth behind that of the US?



Here is another thing that was going on before Bush was president.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4146969.stm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International