View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bangbayed

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:53 am Post subject: Greenspan Admits Capitalism Needs Intervention |
|
|
Quote: |
Greenspan admits 'mistake' on bank regulation
Ex-U.S. Fed chief wrongly thought that self-interest would mitigate risk
BARRIE MCKENNA
October 24, 2008
WASHINGTON -- Surveying the wreckage of the credit crisis, Alan Greenspan says he made one very big mistake.
The free-market cheerleader and former maestro of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board conceded yesterday that he wrongly thought banks had an inherent interest in shielding their institutions and their shareholders from risk.
That assumption turned out to have been dead wrong as financial institutions brought the banking system to the brink of failure in recent months after loading up on exotic mortgages and risky derivative products such as credit default swaps.
"I made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organizations, specifically banks and others, were such that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms," Mr. Greenspan bluntly told a U.S. congressional committee exploring the role of regulators in the financial crisis.
"Something which looked to be a very solid edifice and, indeed, a critical pillar to market competition and free markets did break down.
"And I think that ... shocked me. I still do not fully understand why it happened."
The staunch belief that banks could manage their own tolerance for risk underpinned Mr. Greenspan's aversion to heavy-handed banking regulation during his record 18-year tenure at the helm of the Fed.
Mr. Greenspan was an early devotee of author Ayn Rand, whose 1957 novel Atlas Shrugged inspired a generation of libertarian thinkers who believe in the right of individuals to live entirely for their own interest. |
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20081024.CRISIS24/TPStory/International |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quite amazing even the most august financial institutions would extend themselves far beyond what they had on deposit.
All of this has been like a pyramid scheme--everyone was making money with each repackaging/sale of debt, taking their %.
Worked well until it all went to *beep*. Like most pyramid schemes.
The guy left holding the bag these days would be the taxpayer.
Why require sensible bonafides in selling mortgages when you're just going to sell them on, make your % and have your hands washed of the debt? Wall Street did not seem to care.
VOLUME, not financial soundness of your clientele. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Join Me

Joined: 14 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
As much as I love to blame Bush for everything it was interesting watching Greenspan try to play dumb over his role in this whole mess. For years the whole world would stand by with baited breath at the mere thought that Greenspan was about to open his mouth. Funny...looks like he didn't know sheeeet!!! He sure played the role well though so I give him credit for pulling that off for so many years. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
The headline to this is completely misleading and wrong.
I watched Greenspan and listened to his words.
He said that he never thought that housing prices would decline, that he had never seen such a decline and never expected it. That is why he didn't believe that the inflationary bubble that he had created in housing, to reinflate the collapsed inflationary bubble from the dot.com crisis, would ever collapse.
In essence, the failure he admitted was his own failure to realize the an inflationary housing bubble would collapse just like any other inflationary bubble.
He tried to put it on the banks by asserting that he thought the banks' self interest would prevent the collapse of the bubble. But he should have known that the collapse was inevitable, as Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, myself and others have been saying for decades.
The devastation caused by massive socialistic interventions into the marketplace are so heavyhanded, evil and onesided that they destroy the delicate balance of the natural economic ecosystem.
The evil, socialist Federal Reserve caused the collapse. Greenspan essentially admitted that, but tried to give himself wiggle room saying that he didn't know it would happen.
You can tell he's lying. He did know that it would likely happen, but he hoped that it wouldn't. He was hoping that the economics that he studied, knew, supported and believed in was wrong and that the socialist/keynesian boneheads were right. He gambled and lost. We all lost.
Another way to think about it:
An Insurance company spreads the risk to other insurers, in the case of fire insurance for example, through reinsurance contracts so that they do not cover all the buildings in large contiguous areas, even if they are the original underwriter, to prevent against corporate failure in a major citywide fire. Even so, if the government firebombs the whole country, that company and the whole fire insurance industry would collapse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sharkey

Joined: 12 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BUT BUT BUT BUT THATS SOCIALISM!!!!!!!!!!!! ( ALL AMERICANS RUN AWAY SCARED) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ernie
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Location: asdfghjk
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so really it's the public's fault for presuming that their leaders have an inherent interest in shielding their institutions and taxpayers from risk.
Last edited by ernie on Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bangbayed

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
In essence, the failure he admitted was his own failure to realize the an inflationary housing bubble would collapse just like any other inflationary bubble.
He tried to put it on the banks by asserting that he thought the banks' self interest would prevent the collapse of the bubble. But he should have known that the collapse was inevitable, as Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, myself and others have been saying for decades.
The devastation caused by massive socialistic interventions into the marketplace are so heavyhanded, evil and onesided that they destroy the delicate balance of the natural economic ecosystem.
The evil, socialist Federal Reserve caused the collapse. Greenspan essentially admitted that, but tried to give himself wiggle room saying that he didn't know it would happen. |
You can judge for yourself what he said exactly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55-A1-D3MR0
Last edited by bangbayed on Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bangbayed

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sharkey wrote: |
BUT BUT BUT BUT THATS SOCIALISM!!!!!!!!!!!! ( ALL AMERICANS RUN AWAY SCARED) |
Ain't that the truth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When the democrats talk about doing it, it's "socialism" ....when the Republicans actually do it, it's "capitalism". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sharkey wrote: |
BUT BUT BUT BUT THATS SOCIALISM!!!!!!!!!!!! ( ALL AMERICANS RUN AWAY SCARED) |
LOL. So true. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JustJohn

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Location: Your computer screen
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quite interesting. I do think the Republican jibe is a little out of place: Both Republicans and Democrats are partially socialist, but Democrats are most certainly a notch more so.
I think The jury is still out on socialism in many respects, at least in my book. I think one look at Russia can tell us the full blown socialism doesn't work. However, many European countries have been practicing moderate forms of socialism for a while now and seem to be doing just fine.
As a footnote, I think the Americans being against socialism thing is more about ideals than economic policy. The U.S. was founded by a group of people with a rabid thirst for personal freedoms, and not much has changed. People feel like socialist policies impinge on those freedoms, hence the aversion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
canuckistan wrote: |
When the democrats talk about doing it, it's "socialism" ....when the Republicans actually do it, it's "capitalism". |
Don't be confused.
When the Democrats do it, it's Socialism.
When the Repbulicans do it, it's still Socialism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JustJohn

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Location: Your computer screen
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
canuckistan wrote: |
When the democrats talk about doing it, it's "socialism" ....when the Republicans actually do it, it's "capitalism". |
Don't be confused.
When the Democrats do it, it's Socialism.
When the Repbulicans do it, it's still Socialism. |
Oh yah. Almost forgot. I was going to say that too.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|