Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Meet B. Obama's Chief of Staff: Rahm Emanuel
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:26 pm    Post subject: Meet B. Obama's Chief of Staff: Rahm Emanuel Reply with quote

Quote:
President-elect Barack Obama pivoted quickly to begin filling out his new administration on Wednesday, selecting hard-charging Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel as White House chief of staff while aides stepped up the pace of transition work that had been cloaked in pre-election secrecy.

Several Democrats confirmed that Emanuel had been offered the job...


NPR Reports
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Freakstar



Joined: 29 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OMG. I personally know Rahm's brother, Ari. Get the f*ck outta here!!!!!! Wow. Congrats to Rahm.

Interesting choice though, since Rahm is very close to the Clintons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From Wiki:

[H]e reportedly told British Prime Minister Tony Blair, prior to Blair appearing in public with Clinton for the first time after the Lewinsky scandal, "This is important. Don't *beep* it up."[8]
Very Happy I can see that.

Emanuel is said to have "mailed a rotting fish to a former coworker after the two parted ways."[7]
Crying or Very sad Not very original.

On the night after the 1996 election, "Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting 'Dead! ... Dead! ... Dead!' and plunging the knife into the table after every name."[1]
Shocked Ummm...can't Obama keep looking?

His "take-no-prisoners attitude" earned him the nickname "Rahm-bo".[7]

People who worked with Emanuel at that time "insist the once hard-charging staffer has mellowed out."

***

If these reports on Wiki are true, I think Obama needs to go to his second choice. Whoever it is, it must be better than this guy. Rham sounds like he took 20 years longer than the rest of us to grow up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Freakstar



Joined: 29 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
From Wiki:

[H]e reportedly told British Prime Minister Tony Blair, prior to Blair appearing in public with Clinton for the first time after the Lewinsky scandal, "This is important. Don't *beep* it up."[8]
Very Happy I can see that.

Emanuel is said to have "mailed a rotting fish to a former coworker after the two parted ways."[7]
Crying or Very sad Not very original.

On the night after the 1996 election, "Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting 'Dead! ... Dead! ... Dead!' and plunging the knife into the table after every name."[1]
Shocked Ummm...can't Obama keep looking?

His "take-no-prisoners attitude" earned him the nickname "Rahm-bo".[7]

People who worked with Emanuel at that time "insist the once hard-charging staffer has mellowed out."

***

If these reports on Wiki are true, I think Obama needs to go to his second choice. Whoever it is, it must be better than this guy. Rham sounds like he took 20 years longer than the rest of us to grow up.


I don't know Rahm personally, but I do know of him. The man is a brilliant political strategist. Hell, I don't know if he's the right man for the job, but please don't sum up his career, achievements and qualifications based on a few quotes from Wikipedia. Rolling Eyes

And for the record, most extremely successful people are NOT nice. Most of them are a bit cuckoo in the head, too. Not suggesting that you have to be a d*ckwad or a psycho to be successful, but you don't get to the top without stepping on a few toes. Rahm's brother is one of the smartest men I know...he's also got major ADD and is one obnoxious, cocky and opinionated individual who is not easy to deal with by any means. But he is an excellent businessman. All three Emanuel brothers are ultimate overachievers. Ezekiel Emanuel is a medical genius. Literally.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
bangbayed



Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A bit of trivia, Rahm Emmanuel's brother, Ari is a Hollywood talent agent who Jeremy Piven basically plays on HBO's Entourage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, looks like JOO RIP can faithfully and gladly go back to being a staunch Democrat again (like he claims he was before the War in Iraq).

RAHM EMANUEL is a Zionist and loyalist to ISRAEL and essentially a NEOCON as well. I smell trouble with this guy. He was always critical of BUSH, because he thought BUSH was ineffective, clueless, and the entire other range of idiocies. Emanuel however, certainly wants the wars on terrorism and protect Israel at all costs of the neocons, he just simply thinks he knows significantly more effective ways to go about it (probably does, Bush was certainly inefficient).

DOMESTICALLY. He also has a book: �Big Ideas for America�. I haven't read the book, but I don't see many big ideas from reviews I've read. Mostly he wants to increase the healthcare industry scam so it covers more people, particularly children. Not that surprising there. He also wants education to be changed slightly to reward teachers, plus free eduction to those who join the armed services, and he wants to make 401K plans mandatory (essentially to deal with the presumed loss of social security that probably won't be there). Nothing much more to his supposed 'Democrat version of the CONTRACT WITH AMERICA' that Newt so revolutionized in his day. That's about it domestically.

BIGGEST THINGS he wants to do: 100,000 more soldiers into the U.S. military, and make an elite agency to fight DOMESTIC terrorism. he also wants all Americans aged 18-25 to undergo three months of compulsory disaster-training.

SO...my personal assessment: LOUSY CHOICE. Great for those who are seriously concerned about terrorism and think it is the greatest threat to America though, and that most of American taxpayer money should be going to that cause and that cause alone at the expense of all else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
but please don't sum up his career, achievements and qualifications based on a few quotes from Wikipedia.


Is it the behavior that is important or the source of the reports about his (mis)behavior?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Freakstar



Joined: 29 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
but please don't sum up his career, achievements and qualifications based on a few quotes from Wikipedia.


Is it the behavior that is important or the source of the reports about his (mis)behavior?


You missed my point entirely.

Just a suggestion, but maybe do a little more research on the man other than getting all your information from Wikipedia. Rolling Eyes Find out the good, the bad and the ugly about the guy and then make an INFORMED assessment about whether he's the right guy for the job. Even many of his detractors will blast him for being abrasive and unpleasant, but they'll also turn around and admit that he's super smart, tough as balls and very loyal (which is what Obama may need right now - someone who has his back and someone who knows the White House and Congress like the back of his hand, someone to play bad cop to Obama's good cop), and there probably is no one out there who is better qualified for the position. Even people who don't like the guy are saying this. This speaks VOLUMES.

http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2008/6/16/1/a-discussion-about-healthcare-with-ezekiel-ari-and-rahm-emanuel

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/us/politics/06rahm.html?ref=politics

http://www.esquire.com/features/man-at-his-best/ESQ0704-JULY_MOTM

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/8091986/the_enforcer/

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1856965,00.html

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-emanuel6-2008nov06,0,5606298.story

http://money.cnn.com/2006/09/17/magazines/fortune/politics.fortune/index.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
You missed my point entirely.


No I didn't. I got your point and decided to ignore it because it wasn't worth considering.

I don't care if the man is cute or not. I care even less if he has brilliant brothers. If they are that brilliant, then choose one of them.

He had his chance in the limelight and showed he was immature. Maybe he has grown up since, but my question remains: Why did it take him 20 years longer than the rest of us (defined loosely) to catch up? There are 300 million people who are eligible for the job. Why pick someone who showed he was immature?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bibbitybop



Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes! Wikipedia citations!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ManintheMiddle



Joined: 20 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As namby-pamby liberals would say, "He has some issues."

Yes, anger managment classes might help, or perhaps he's had them already. Wonder if he will be Obama's attack dog and, if so, how Obama can hope to be bi-partisan. Of course this is all little more than idle speculation at this early juncture.

I know this much: the man is solidly pro-Israeli and was once accused of being a Zionist. So while Shimon Peres will rest easier I'm not sure Abbas will.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am not too crazy over Rahm either, because he is too hard-nosed, I feel, and I understand you have to be, sometimes, to be successful. As far as Zionists, Clinton had Martin Indyk, so there is nothing unusual about having an ardent Zionist. Rahm might be useful if people go on the attack against Barak Obama. He has his strong points. I just have my reservations. I hope Reich is included in the cabinet, but I doubt that will happen. As long as Obama puts in a balanced cabinet, then it might be fine. There was no balance in the Bush Administration as we all know. Rice became like Powell after Powell left, though belatedly so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Freakstar



Joined: 29 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bibbitybop wrote:
Yes! Wikipedia citations!


LOL. Seriously. Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Freakstar



Joined: 29 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adventurer wrote:
I am not too crazy over Rahm either, because he is too hard-nosed, I feel, and I understand you have to be, sometimes, to be successful. As far as Zionists, Clinton had Martin Indyk, so there is nothing unusual about having an ardent Zionist. Rahm might be useful if people go on the attack against Barak Obama. He has his strong points. I just have my reservations. I hope Reich is included in the cabinet, but I doubt that will happen. As long as Obama puts in a balanced cabinet, then it might be fine. There was no balance in the Bush Administration as we all know. Rice became like Powell after Powell left, though belatedly so.


I have my reservations, too. I think he's brilliant, but I don't know if he's the right choice. I agree with you that Obama needs a balanced cabinet and am curious to see as to what names come forth in the next few weeks.


Last edited by Freakstar on Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:28 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Freakstar



Joined: 29 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
You missed my point entirely.


No I didn't.


Oh but you did. Wikipedia citations. Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International