| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:29 pm Post subject: aggressivity and Korean employers |
|
|
| Is it rather common for Korean managers to rather overbearing? I know you find that kind of thing world-wide, but in many cases managers have no management training and seem to focus on hollering out orders and in many cases such behavior doesn't work too well on many foreigners. Do you think many Korean managers run into problems, because foreigners are not so accustomed to simply being doormats? It seems there is too much reliance on positions, being forceful rather than on logic, modern methods of management taught in business schools etc...I understand it's a different culture. I just wanted to know what old-timers have observed over here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I find most managers I've worked with didn't have the guts to discuss problems with me, until they allow it to get to a serious point ("We're reducing your pay this month because you didn't ________").
By the way, agressivity, good word. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do believe that any lack of insight in the HR department creates a lot of problems.
There is this belief that the boss knows best and he just has to belch out his wishes.
I Wonder why they hire such culturally insensitive people to do a very delicate job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think you mean agressiveness? (If not I didn't know agressivity is a word).
The ones familiar to dealing with waegooks likely have a rather different attitude. I think that their problems generally fall into three categories: teachers who have no conception of the Koran workplace; teachers who are terribly unprofessional; and teachers who are too professional for their hagwons. They also seem to have no idea when and when not to show aggression. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ernie
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Location: asdfghjk
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 'aggression' FTW! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lukychrm42
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Location: Cheonan
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ernie wrote: |
| 'aggression' FTW! |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Yu_Bum_suk"]I think you mean agressiveness? (If not I didn't know agressivity is a word).
quote]
aggressive Definition
ag�gres�sive (ə gres′iv)
adjective
aggressing or inclined to aggress; starting fights or quarrels
ready or willing to take issue or engage in direct action; militant
full of enterprise and initiative; bold and active; pushing
Psychiatry of or involving aggression
Related Forms:
aggressively ag�gres′�sively adverb
aggressiveness ag�gres′�sive�ness noun
aggressivity ag�gres�siv�ity (ag′res iv′ə tē, ə gres′-) noun
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ha Ha. People sure got aggressive about agressivity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asylum seeker
Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Location: On your computer screen.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Adventurer"]
| Yu_Bum_suk wrote: |
I think you mean agressiveness? (If not I didn't know agressivity is a word).
quote]
aggressive Definition
ag�gres�sive (ə gres′iv)
adjective
aggressing or inclined to aggress; starting fights or quarrels
ready or willing to take issue or engage in direct action; militant
full of enterprise and initiative; bold and active; pushing
Psychiatry of or involving aggression
Related Forms:
aggressively ag�gres′�sively adverb
aggressiveness ag�gres′�sive�ness noun
aggressivity ag�gres�siv�ity (ag′res iv′ə tē, ə gres′-) noun
|
I think you just started the thread so you could use this word. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="asylum seeker"]
| Adventurer wrote: |
| Yu_Bum_suk wrote: |
I think you mean agressiveness? (If not I didn't know agressivity is a word).
quote]
aggressive Definition
ag�gres�sive (ə gres′iv)
adjective
aggressing or inclined to aggress; starting fights or quarrels
ready or willing to take issue or engage in direct action; militant
full of enterprise and initiative; bold and active; pushing
Psychiatry of or involving aggression
Related Forms:
aggressively ag�gres′�sively adverb
aggressiveness ag�gres′�sive�ness noun
aggressivity ag�gres�siv�ity (ag′res iv′ə tē, ə gres′-) noun
|
I think you just started the thread so you could use this word. |
That's a negative. Both words are acceptable, and I simply gravitated to that particular word. Anyway, I was seriously interested in a discussion on how management differs in Korea vis-a-vis North America or Europe.
I am used to the concept that management in North America is supposed to be, in theory, competent, and they have to have lots of experience and often some sort of training, and there isn't a huge reliance on using power to subdue their subordinates. I feel the latter is what is prevalent in Korea rather than modern concepts of management. It's almost like having military dictatorships everywhere or some hybrid Confucianism.
I am not really sure. Every culture is different, but I definitely prefer the style in North America. It allows for more creativity, positive change in the work place, and encourages high morale amongst the employees. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EzeWong

Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I haven't experienced the dark side of Korean employment yet, it's been peachy zen so far. So I can't say from personal experience. But I can talk about the dark side of western managment:
US management is like this disco ball pretending to be high and mighty up there chandliering, but basically the whole things unsubstantive and they're hoping that you're satisifed with this flashy colored light show they give you.
I'm not the only one that thinks this, people complain all the time about evaluations that mean jack squat and all this useless management crap aimed at peaking performance actually being counterproductive. Half that crap I learned in management school and when trying to apply it to real life... utter utter shit. Nobody believes in it except lucid idealists.
I personally never liked middle management bosses either. They use all these passive aggressive whinning to try to get you to do something and use "incentives" and all this meaningless motivation.
Personal preference, I prefer the direct way. Things get done faster if the underlings (yes I'm using the derogatory term) would just listen and do what we said everything would be peachy. But everyone needs some kind of justification, or explanation, or this or that. I worked as a manager and when I asked politely for people to do their job, I expected them to get done. Rather I was questioned to no end. The US workforce is spoiled beyond belief. Everyone wants equal say and power and when you allow it to them they make stupid ass decesions.
But that's really the dark side of it all. Of course there are some benefits to our system, such as a happier employees etc etc... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Freakstar
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| EzeWong wrote: |
| Personal preference, I prefer the direct way. Things get done faster if the underlings (yes I'm using the derogatory term) would just listen and do what we said everything would be peachy. etc... |
I hold a so-called middle management position and manage a team of six (soon to be five), not including yours truly. I tell ya it's not easy. I'm a 팀장/차장 and I only have two people that I directly report to, my 상무님 and our CEO, now that my 이사님 is no longer with us. I have no interest in filling her position though...I make as much (if not more) than what she used to make, and I don't have to do deal with some of the upper management BS that she had to deal with. I'd rather just manage my team. Just as long as some a-hole doesn't come along and fill her shoes, I'm perfectly happy where I'm at for the time being. But again, it's not easy. Especially when two of the guys I manage are super competitive with each other and always trying to one up the other. (Funny thing is, I've already made up my mind as to who should be promoted - one's a superstar in the making, the other..not so much.) I try to take into account everyone's opinions, from the lowest guy on the totem pole to the highest guy, but as a manager, I've got to make almost all the big decisions for my team. But what I like about being a middle manager here in Korea is that yes, your "underlings" respect you. Or maybe they don't, but they act as if they respect you. I may not always be right, but then hey, if I tell one of my team members to do something and then it turns out I'm wrong, then damn it, my a** is on the line, not theirs. I take full responsibility. More pressure on me...but then, hey, I'm a superstar...that can do no wrong. Or so that's the rumor.
Ok, I'm rambling cuz I'm tired and I drank too much crap soju. Good night! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ernie
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Location: asdfghjk
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i just prefer not to use an adjective ending followed by a noun ending. it's inelegant, redundant, and UGLY.
kind of like saying 'Confucianiveness' instead of 'Confucianism'. much too confusivenessing to me.
Last edited by ernie on Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jkelly80

Joined: 13 Jun 2007 Location: you boys like mexico?
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EzeWong wrote: |
| irrelevant tangent |
Korean management is far inferior, because they simply aren't trained to be managers. Men in this country get their imprint from the army, rather than being trained to do so. So they bark out orders and try to intimidate. This also comes from the tradition of never rebuking children, especially males. They grow up to be spoiled princes. That's a terrible way to run a workforce, and it's why Koreans have some of the lowest job satisfaction in the world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EzeWong

Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jkelly80 wrote: |
| EzeWong wrote: |
| irrelevant tangent |
Korean management is far inferior, because they simply aren't trained to be managers. Men in this country get their imprint from the army, rather than being trained to do so. So they bark out orders and try to intimidate. This also comes from the tradition of never rebuking children, especially males. They grow up to be spoiled princes. That's a terrible way to run a workforce, and it's why Koreans have some of the lowest job satisfaction in the world. |
Irrelvant Tangent?
How's a topic directly related to the topic irrelevant. Obviously, that's some of your gripes with me from other topics spilling onto this one. Possibly your close nature with M-Su, whom I regard as a supernova idiot?
Here's an irrelevant tangent: I think anyone who thinks M-SU is funny, needs to get their bones checked. It's some of the most mundane, overexhausted forum joke. Funny the first time hahah. But a kid who thinks a joke (especially on the internet) can be revisted every day is funny, has to grow up. If it's an attempt at a Dave's ESL cafe meme, it was terrible and if I met him in real life, I'd probably feel compelled to beat his face for beaing such an idiot.
On topic: Neither is obviously inferior to the other. They are simply differences. Like freakstar said, there's many cons and pros to both systems. Having worked middle management and being subjected to it on the Western side, I have reasons and points I can find critical. Like all that I've already mentioned. However, you do make a good point jkelly that western employees have greater job satisifaction. It's tradeoffs and AS A MANAGER I prefer the Korean style. Even being an underling in Korea is pretty goodr... They tell me what to do, I do it, no questions asked. Work is done, and I'm not bent out of shape on "whys" of every decesion that needs to be made.
That's my preference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|