Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

AT&T now throttling internet bandwidth in US
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:46 pm    Post subject: AT&T now throttling internet bandwidth in US Reply with quote

http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/15872.cfm

Just one month after Comcast began imposing a bandwidth cap of 250 GB on all of its subscribers, AT&T has begun testing a cap of their own, however with a much smaller limit, 150 GB.

The cap will have tiers as well depending on how fast your connection is, slower users will only get 20 GB limit while the fastest users will get the 150 GB cap.

The test, beginning in Reno, Nevada today, will "evaluate a usage-based model that could potentially help address today's trend of explosive bandwidth usage, [and] may be extended to one other market by the end of the year," said AT&T.

Anyone in Reno who uses over 150 GB per month will automatically be enrolled in the full bandwidth trial at the end of the year.

Any trial participant that exceeds the limit will be given a one-month grace period but if they do it again they will be fined $1 for every GB over they go.

Unlike Comcast however, AT&T will provide all customers with a "bandwidth measuring tool" and will also notify customers when they have hit 80 percent of their limit.

"A small group of customers are using the majority of bandwidth on our network," added AT&T. "In fact, almost 50 percent of total bandwidth is used by just five percent of customers � customers, for example, who are uploading and downloading the equivalent of more than 40,000 YouTube videos or 40 million e-mails a month. This kind of heavy usage has an impact on all of our customers."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sojourner1



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Location: Where meggi swim and 2 wheeled tractors go sput put chug alugg pug pug

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know my bandwidth is very high due to (illegally) downloading movies and TV shows. Well, I don't see any DVD's for rent, but I used to use mail rental DVD services such as Netflix at home instead of relying on torrents as DVD's offer higher video quality. I can't think of any other reason why broadband users would have such explosive bandwidth.

Of course bandwidth is how many gigabytes of data is going through a website or internet connection. The more bandwidth demanded, the more servers and satellite COM necessary to handle the excessive data traffic. If servers are inadequate to handle the load at any time, then internet speeds slow down. Often, internet providers at home don't have enough servers or have too many subscribers on one server so speed get ridiculously slow in the evenings, sometimes to a halt of waiting for a browser to load a page.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DCJames



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It was only a matter of time before the greedy telecoms made a move to over-regulate Internet usuage. Gone are the days of freely downloading as many movies / music / games as you wanted just for the sake of having a large collection.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OneWayTraffic



Joined: 14 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DCJames wrote:
It was only a matter of time before the greedy telecoms made a move to over-regulate Internet usuage. Gone are the days of freely downloading as many movies / music / games as you wanted just for the sake of having a large collection.


I find the cognitive dissonance between "greedy telecoms" and "downloading as many movies / music / games as you wanted just for the sake of having a large collection" amusing.

Companies trying to reduce costs in order to provide better returns for the stockholder owners? Well I never! Investing in larger networks instead of restricting the 5% of customers who use most of the bandwidth is just bad business.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
livinginkunsan



Joined: 02 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OneWayTraffic wrote:

Companies trying to reduce costs in order to provide better returns for the stockholder owners? Well I never! Investing in larger networks instead of restricting the 5% of customers who use most of the bandwidth is just bad business.


I find it more of an issue of promising a certain service (certain speed etc), but not fulfilling the contract.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bigfeet



Joined: 29 May 2008
Location: Grrrrr.....

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How much bandwidth would playing an hour of WoW use?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
egrog1717



Joined: 12 Mar 2008

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bigfeet wrote:
How much bandwidth would playing an hour of WoW use?


Not a whole lot surprisingly.. Used to do it at university on the Wifi and was never getting anywhere near my cap (less than 50gb a month or something...)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChinaBoy



Joined: 17 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't understand why they can't just offer an "unlimited" package for a monthly fee. Fines and penalties are just ridiculous, and definitely NOT consumer-friendly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DCJames



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OneWayTraffic wrote:
DCJames wrote:
It was only a matter of time before the greedy telecoms made a move to over-regulate Internet usuage. Gone are the days of freely downloading as many movies / music / games as you wanted just for the sake of having a large collection.


I find the cognitive dissonance between "greedy telecoms" and "downloading as many movies / music / games as you wanted just for the sake of having a large collection" amusing.

Companies trying to reduce costs in order to provide better returns for the stockholder owners? Well I never! Investing in larger networks instead of restricting the 5% of customers who use most of the bandwidth is just bad business.



Haha! "Better returns for stockholders"??? The main goal of the telecoms is to make bigger profits nothing more than that. When the tech sector of the stock market crashed in the early 2000's, the telecoms left their stockholders high and dry. Laughing

Consumers should be able to do whatever the f.uck they want with the bandwidth they buy from the ISPs. The telecoms better reduce their prices if they reduce their levels of service. I'm willing to bet these greedy telecoms won't.


Last edited by DCJames on Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Temporary



Joined: 13 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually Telecoms haven't been improving their service. It has relatively stayed the same level or gotten worse. Telecoms haven't improved their lines, or speeds on their lines. American telecoms are really bad for that. I had a friend from telus go down to Florida after a hurricane to help restore the lines and he said the stuff they were using were over 40-50years old.

This is where the whole thing of Net Neutrality comes into play. Telecoms would love to the same to the internet as they have done with their cellphone networks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bigfeet



Joined: 29 May 2008
Location: Grrrrr.....

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChinaBoy wrote:
I don't understand why they can't just offer an "unlimited" package for a monthly fee. Fines and penalties are just ridiculous, and definitely NOT consumer-friendly.


They're trying to milk more money from existing users.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They can't offer unlimited because a small percentage of users are eating up most of the bandwidth. If they offered unlimited, nothing would change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Juregen



Joined: 30 May 2006

PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bassexpander wrote:
They can't offer unlimited because a small percentage of users are eating up most of the bandwidth. If they offered unlimited, nothing would change.


This is the correct point.

I worked for an ISP who had initially no download restrictions.

There was a 5% population using 60% of the bandwidth, reducing the service to other users.

Most internet users don't go above 10GB a month. So 150GB still leaves enough room to download whatever you need, at this point in time.

There is however a growing usage for ALL users. All users are increasing, gradually, their bandwidth usage, so in the long run 150GB might be insufficient.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DCJames



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Juregen wrote:
bassexpander wrote:
They can't offer unlimited because a small percentage of users are eating up most of the bandwidth. If they offered unlimited, nothing would change.


This is the correct point.

I worked for an ISP who had initially no download restrictions.

There was a 5% population using 60% of the bandwidth, reducing the service to other users.

Most internet users don't go above 10GB a month. So 150GB still leaves enough room to download whatever you need, at this point in time.

There is however a growing usage for ALL users. All users are increasing, gradually, their bandwidth usage, so in the long run 150GB might be insufficient.


These ISPs should accomodate the trend of more users needing more bandwidth.

The current trend on the Internet is moving towards more and more Video-on-demand downloads and streaming services that require more bandwidth. ISPs are going against what more and more consumers are trending towards when they limit bandwidth availability.

Do you actually think these ISPs will lower prices for their cut in levels of service (amount of bandwidth available)?????
Bandwith restrictions mean people are paying the same for less and that's just bad business and consumers should be pissed off about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bigfeet



Joined: 29 May 2008
Location: Grrrrr.....

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, the thread's subject is wrong. Razz They're capping usage at different price points, not throttling bandwidth. High-usage customers will need to do their own throttling or face being charged more.

This is equivalent to making the product smaller and selling it at the same price vs. keeping the size the same and bumping up the price. So going one way will make them more money directly while going the other way will let them save more money. If you can't make more money then the next best thing is to save money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International