|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BS.Dos.

Joined: 29 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seeing the Daily Mail has reminded me that I must buy some ass paper tomorrow.
Rag of choice for the fascist housewife. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I wouldn't exactly call these the most substantial pieces of journalism I've ever read. The first article is ambiguous about who is actually enforcing this on the Salvation Army, and quotes only a couple of SA members themselves as saying that it was done out of sensitivity to other religions.
Quote: |
Members have been forbidden to shake their charity tins - even if it's done in time to the music - in case it harasses or intimidates people. One said she had been told it might also offend other religions.
|
Without corroborating evidence, I don't think I would neccessarily take as gospel the Sally Anners claims of persecution.
From the Xmas lights story...
Quote: |
But she was left stunned this year when a South Tyneside Homes worker called at her house to inform her that the decorations she was displaying might be offending her neighbours.
The association last night apologised to Mrs Glenn and insisted that removing Christmas lights was not part of their policy.
|
Basically, this is a story based around what one worker, acting on her own initiative, told one resident. The association did not back up the worker.
As for the guide dog, well, it was a mistake on the part of the restaurant, and they've apologized, thus gutting the story of whatever dramatic impact it might have. Wouldn't surprise me if religion played a role in the restaurant's original decision. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
So, in other words, members of the SA were told to stop making noise for fear of offending muslims, a government official told a lady to take down xmas lights for fear of offending muslims (though apparently acted alone) and a man and his guide dog offended muslims and were ejected from an eatery, though the non-muslim who waa scared of offending his muslim employees apologized.
Meanwhile:
Quote: |
Some Imams 'biased against women'
Many women felt they did not get a fair hearing under Sharia law
A Muslim think tank has found some UK Imams discriminate against women when enforcing Islamic Sharia law. |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7783627.stm
Even muslims are saying that shaira law in the UK is biased against women.
Every step of the way, we see multiculti types - who are terrified of islam - changing the country for it. This, OTOH, is no different from Canada and the HRC's.
So, who are the real islamophobes? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
This, OTOH, is no different from Canada and the HRC's.
|
Well, except that the stuff I usually read about the HRCs is fairly detailed, in terms of telling is who's doing what to whom, at what level of government, and just how costly and time-consumming all of this must be. I don't quite get the same degree of insight from the Daily Mail articles. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
I don't quite get the same degree of insight from the Daily Mail articles. |
Fair enough. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Meanwhile:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/damian_thompson/blog/2008/12/17/exclusive_60_per_cent_of_britains_muslim_schools_have_extremist_links_report_says
Quote: |
Britain's Muslim schools are facing a devastating blow to their reputation from a report suggesting that over 60 per cent of them are linked to potentially dangerous Islamic fundamentalists.
An early version of the report, entitled When Worlds Collide, alleges that of the 133 Muslim primary and secondary schools it surveyed, 82 (61.6 per cent) have connections or direct affiliations to fundamentalists. The 133 schools are in both the private and public sectors and supposedly subject to Ofsted inspection. If one includes 24 Saudi schools "about which little is known" (the report�s phrase), then the fundamentalist proportion rises to 67.5 per cent.
You won't be surprised to learn that it has also discovered that some of these schools teach "repugnant" beliefs about the wickedness of Western society and Jews.
The claims in the report, written by Denis MacEoin in response to a commission from Civitas, will provoke ritual cries of "Islamophobia" from the Muslim Council of Britain and fellow travellers such as Koran Armstrong. MacEoin has been careful to back up his claims with evidence - in particular, screen captures of links to Islamic hate-mongers, including supporters of Al-Qaeda.
Even so, I gather that Civitas is in a nervous mood. My understanding is that when When Worlds Collide appears, it will have been edited. A spokesman explains: "We want to concentrate on claims that are absolutely robust, rather than complicated material, some of it in Arabic, that might unjustly damage someone's reputation."
Perhaps the most alarming finding of the draft I've seen is that so many of these schools (including ones with no connections to political extremism) are bricking up their pupils behind a wall of Koranic injunctions and Sharia law.
The schools known as Darul Ulooms, which base their curriculum on a seventeenth-century Indian teaching system, include very few secular subjects, claims the report. It says: "Their aim is not to prepare pupils for life in the wider world, but to give them the tools for a more limited existence inside the Muslim enclaves."
The consequences for bright Muslim British girls are absolutely dire. Lively intellects are being destroyed and brilliant careers cut off before they can begin. To quote the report again: �Every year, an incalculable number of Muslim teenagers and young women are lost to the wider world that informs their citizenship.�
The numbers are increasing fast. The growth of non-Muslim schools, says MacEoin, is �hugely overshadowed by a rapidly growing sector of Muslim institutions. These now number 127 full-time schools and an estimated 700 part-time madrassas for intense religious instruction [and that doesn�t include the Darul Uloom seminaries] � Many recreate in the UK the style and content of schooling that can be found in Pakistan, Bangladesh and India.� Great.
And all this is happening with the implicit consent of the Government, Ofsted � and Christian leaders, who bang on about the threat to �faith schools� (and, in the case of R. Williams, the virtues of Sharia) while shielding their eyes from the evidence that many Muslim faith schools are poisonously anti-Christian.
I've seen many of the extremely damaging screen grabs on which MacEoin bases his claims. Memo to the Muslim Council of Britain: start lining up irate spokesmen now. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Neil
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Location: Tokyo
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
1, Multi-cult doesn't always = islam, they make up only a part of the UKs foreign community. Indians, Chinese and West Indians are in just as equal or greater numbers. - edit I forgot about the Poles who seem to be over in large numbers and the Australians pouring pints in Earls Court complaining about the weather of course.
2, The UK is actually very mono-cultural, Americans/Canadians just assume it's the other way because they only usually visit London, which is I'd guess 30% ethnic, outside of London it's less than 10%.
3, The media in the UK is pretty much Broadcast=liberal, Print=Conservative. Out of about 10 daily papers only the Guardian is liberal. The Mirror used to be but it's in decline thesedays. The Mail in particular is a terrible source as they've got form for running these kind of stories without checking the facts before.
4, The Islamic community in the UK is not as you believe a result of white guilt, political correctness..."let am all come in", it's more down to a mixture of colonial misadventures and a need for educated English speaking immigrants in the aftermath of WW2. As a result those who could afford it from the ME and the subcontinent came over around 60 years ago, it's not a recent thing. We have been living with this for a long time with little problems until recently which brings me to.......the fact that the 7/7 bombers and others were not western hating immigrants getting in through the back door but rather the sons and grandsons of these guys who came in the 50s and 60s (and incidentially were far more sucessful economically than other immigrant groups) somehow getting radialised into extream Islam (which from annecdotal sp? evidence the older lot are very unhappy about).......the solution is education IMO.
5, The public and government are well aware of the problems and rather than worshipping at an imaginary PC alter are IMO working hard to end the ghettoision (is that a word?) of these twats (you can't deport folks born in your country) the far right in the UK were doing well a few years ago but have died down since which is a good sign.
Last edited by Neil on Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:40 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Neil, interesting post. Thanks for that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ED209
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Salvation Army article doesn't specify which religion would be offended. It could be Islam, Hindu or any of the many branches of Christianity. All the Mail has is one unnamed member who heard it from someone else that it may offend other religions. It sounds more likely to be about noise complaints. Rattling cans may make shoppers feel harassed. I've always found them civil.
But, yeah, don't read the Mail. It's the Bill O'Reilly of newspapers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
doc_ido

Joined: 03 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You could have posted the exact same links this time last year, or the year before that, or the year before that. Every right-wing rag prints some "in case we offend Muslims" stories around Christmas, just in case the warm and welcoming Brits forget they're supposed to hate them.
On the SA subject, actually all charity collectors were asked to stop shaking tins several years ago because it made people who didn't donate feel uncomfortable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|