|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:34 pm Post subject: South Korea rethinks "alternative" to conscription |
|
|
South Korea rethinks "alternative" to conscription
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE4BN0D820081224
SEOUL (Reuters) - South Korea's military indicated on Wednesday it would hold off on a plan for alternative service for conscientious objectors to the armed forces who are now jailed if they refuse conscription.
Military service of about two years is mandatory for all able-bodied South Korean men in order to field a fighting force strong enough to prevent North Korea's 1.2 million-strong army from attacking. The United States stations about 28,000 troops in the South to support its military.
South Korea' Defense Ministry released a survey on Wednesday saying that nearly 70 percent of the public was opposed to allowing alternative service. It has said the poll results would weigh heavily on its policy decision.
"We can understand it is still too early to allow alternative forms of military service for conscientious objectors," spokesman Won Tae-jae told a news briefing. The ministry had not yet made a final decision, he added.
The Defense Ministry has floated the idea over the past few years of allowing conscientious objectors to perform community service or a non-combat military related jobs.
But conservative and veterans groups have objected, saying it would encourage draft dodging and weaken the country's ability to deter North Korea, which on Tuesday repeated a threat to reduce the South to ashes.
About 300,000 men are conscripted each year into the South's military or riot police. But around 750 men annually refuse to join on moral grounds, often because they are pacifists.
They typically receive prison sentences of about two years. Criminal records make it difficult for objectors to find good jobs and the issue of army service is often raised by potential employers during job interviews.
Service starts at the age of 19, although recruits can defer for a few years depending on their family situation or study plans. For almost all young men, military service interrupts their studies at university or the start of their careers.
(Reporting by Jon Herskovitz and Kim Junghyun; Editing by Nick Macfie) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crossmr

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Location: Hwayangdong, Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
My friend hasn't had to do army service. Sort of.
There is some deal worked out because he has a graduate degree and the company he is working for. They want him to go to the US to get a PhD in Aerospace Engineering.
Apparently if he works for this company for 3 years he is free and clear. The only thing he has to do is 1 month of basic training which he's almost finished. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
crossmr wrote: |
My friend hasn't had to do army service. Sort of.
There is some deal worked out because he has a graduate degree and the company he is working for. They want him to go to the US to get a PhD in Aerospace Engineering.
Apparently if he works for this company for 3 years he is free and clear. The only thing he has to do is 1 month of basic training which he's almost finished. |
This is not in the same category as mentioned in the article. The article is for "conscientious" objectors. Your friend manned up and is doing his service. The military figured his graduate degree would be better utilized working, instead of patrolling the DMZ for 2 years.
I think you can defer doing your service until your 32. Most start before they're 21 though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crossmr

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Location: Hwayangdong, Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
jvalmer wrote: |
This is not in the same category as mentioned in the article. The article is for "conscientious" objectors. Your friend manned up and is doing his service. The military figured his graduate degree would be better utilized working, instead of patrolling the DMZ for 2 years.
I think you can defer doing your service until your 32. Most start before they're 21 though. |
Yeah, but it is an alternative. It isn't really that much in the way of "service" though. He's just got a job as he would any other job. He worked at it for 11 months before they made him go do his basic training. Now he's working on stuff for cars, he's not even working in a military company or working on military technology. He still gets paid a normal wage, and everything else, so unless there is something he hasn't told me its just like he's working a regular job and got to skip military service. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
crossmr wrote: |
Yeah, but it is an alternative. It isn't really that much in the way of "service" though. He's just got a job as he would any other job. He worked at it for 11 months before they made him go do his basic training. Now he's working on stuff for cars, he's not even working in a military company or working on military technology. He still gets paid a normal wage, and everything else, so unless there is something he hasn't told me its just like he's working a regular job and got to skip military service. |
I knew a guy doing something similar. He had restrictions set on him. He wasn't supposed to leave the country, but his job required him to do so a few times, so he had to ask for permission from the Military Manpower Authority (not sure if that's right name). And when he returned, he had to report back to them within a few days and tell them he actually returned. I think instead of a normal 2 to 3 years, he was under the watchful eye of the military for a little longer. But it sure was a sweet deal, all because he had a graduate science degree. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
crossmr wrote: |
My friend hasn't had to do army service. Sort of.
There is some deal worked out because he has a graduate degree and the company he is working for. They want him to go to the US to get a PhD in Aerospace Engineering.
Apparently if he works for this company for 3 years he is free and clear. The only thing he has to do is 1 month of basic training which he's almost finished. |
Conscientious objectors wouldn't consider this an acceptable alternative because the basic training involves combat training. They don't want to pick up guns and learn how to use them, for any length of time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crossmr

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Location: Hwayangdong, Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bramble wrote: |
Conscientious objectors wouldn't consider this an acceptable alternative because the basic training involves combat training. They don't want to pick up guns and learn how to use them, for any length of time. |
Only if they were conscientious objectors because they were pacifists and not some other reason. Perhaps they just feel 2 years of indentured servitude isn't right, but 30 days of preparedness training might be okay. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
crossmr wrote: |
Bramble wrote: |
Conscientious objectors wouldn't consider this an acceptable alternative because the basic training involves combat training. They don't want to pick up guns and learn how to use them, for any length of time. |
Only if they were conscientious objectors because they were pacifists and not some other reason. Perhaps they just feel 2 years of indentured servitude isn't right, but 30 days of preparedness training might be okay. |
Point taken, but I believe nearly all (if not all) conscientious objectors in Korea are pacifists. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gimpokid

Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Location: Best Gimpo
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's a guy who works at my school who is really fat and I've been told that he has been allowed to help out at the school in leau of military service...I guess that's one way to get out of it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
esetters21

Joined: 30 Apr 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gimpokid wrote: |
There's a guy who works at my school who is really fat and I've been told that he has been allowed to help out at the school in leau of military service...I guess that's one way to get out of it. |
There is a guy at my school that is sort of an IT guy that is doing that for his military service. Funny thing is that I am more competent than him in that respect (I have to show him how to solve software problems). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ED209
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bramble wrote: |
Point taken, but I believe nearly all (if not all) conscientious objectors in Korea are pacifists. |
Or too busy levelling up on World of Warcraft. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theholyinnocent
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
One of my co-workers, who was quite young (20, western age), tried to tell me about some way to get out of military service. I couldn't understand very well because his English was really bad but he basically said something like, if they achieve a lot in some international context (like, he wanted to get into a famous NYC dance company, but he also used "the Yankees" as an example) then they are considered a "winner" and they don't have to go to the military. It was hard for me to understand if he was just talking about deferring service, or actually becoming exempt from it -- because I thought you could defer service for a variety of reasons, not just if you were somehow bringing international pride to Korea. But he really seemed to think that getting into this dance company was his plan to get out of military service.
He didn't seem to have any ideological objection to guns. I think he just really didn't want to have to do it. He was really small and delicate, and he studied modern dance, so I think he was just like, "wtf, no."
Interestingly, another young co-worker once basically got the shit beat out of him by our boss, like hair-pulling and everything (yeah), and when they were explaining to me why we were suddenly having a brawl (since it all went down in Korean) they were like, "He is too young and has not been in the military yet. So he does not know how to be quiet and take orders." He was the only one there, at that point, who had not done military service, and they all brought that fact up when they were talking about him, even though it was just because he was young, not because he had tried to get out of it. I imagine it would be really hard to be a man in Korea who had actively and deliberately avoided military service. I mean just because of the fact that you wouldn't have that common bond, and other guys might alternately be offended by your refusal to forge it, or resent you for not having to go through what they went through. Kind of like a hazing thing; I can see how you would feel kind of "outside" the group. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I don't think going into the military is "manning up." A man who decides it's not right to murder another isn't less of one.
Related to the last post, Korea will exempt athletes from time to time. They did it for the WBC baseball team. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/worldclassic2006/news/story?id=2371821
Quote: |
South Korea decided Friday to exempt national team members competing at the World Baseball Classic from mandatory military service as a reward for advancing to the tournament's semifinals. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Smee wrote: |
Well, I don't think going into the military is "manning up." A man who decides it's not right to murder another isn't less of one.
Related to the last post, Korea will exempt athletes from time to time. They did it for the WBC baseball team. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/worldclassic2006/news/story?id=2371821
Quote: |
South Korea decided Friday to exempt national team members competing at the World Baseball Classic from mandatory military service as a reward for advancing to the tournament's semifinals. |
|
Mandatory military service and voluntary service are two totally different things. Just because you're in the military, doesn't mean you're going to kill someone.
If your country has mandatory service, and all able-bodied men were supposed to do service, in whatever form they determine. I think it would be wrong to purposely avoid it. If you get an exemption for winning some chess championships, fine, no problem. But if you purposely cut off a finger to avoid service, that's wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Pink

Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Location: China
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Smee wrote: |
Well, I don't think going into the military is "manning up." A man who decides it's not right to murder another isn't less of one.
Related to the last post, Korea will exempt athletes from time to time. They did it for the WBC baseball team. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/worldclassic2006/news/story?id=2371821
Quote: |
South Korea decided Friday to exempt national team members competing at the World Baseball Classic from mandatory military service as a reward for advancing to the tournament's semifinals. |
|
They have some law that allows Koreans who achieve well internationally to get an exemption from military service. Usually it means a top 3 standing in a really big competition like the Olympics, or top 4 standing in things like the World Cup. During the 2002 World Cup all those players who had not done their military service were exempted from it as a reward for finishing 4th.
Other categories I guess where one might get an exemption would be things like an academy award or nobel prize. I don't see many young Korean males getting those types of prizes.
My friend had it pretty sweet when he did his military. Like a previous poster's friend, this guy had a master's in science. He went to work for Samsung research for 3yrs instead of doing military service, though it is still on his record that he did his military duty. The beauty was he got paid good bucks while doing it. IMO this is what the smart do to get out of military duty. Get a good degree and help the government out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|