|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:31 am Post subject: Chinese media blame Ssangyong Unionists |
 |
|
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2009/01/123_38419.html
| Quote: |
Chinese Media Blame Ssangyong Unionists
By Sunny Lee
Korea Times Correspondent
BEIJING ― The case of troubled Korean automaker Ssangyong, whose largest shareholder is Chinese carmaker Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC), has been drawing keen interest in China, especially after the news release about a protest in front of the Chinese Embassy in Seoul by some Ssangyong unionists.
Major Chinese newspapers including Beijing Times Global Times and International Herald Leader reported the case through their journalists in Seoul.
Overall, the Chinese media see Ssangyong's vocal and demanding worker's union as being at the center of instigating the issue.
The International Herald Leader accused the unionized workers of various unreasonable demands and drumming up the ``technology theft by a foreign company'' card to stir public opinion and sympathy and seek media attention.
Citing an anonymous industry analyst, the Beijing Times said, "The reason SAIC was unwilling to increase its investment into Ssangyong was because of the Korean government's discriminatory action against China-owned Ssangyong."
It also mentioned the growing anti-foreign sentiment in Korea, mentioning the Lone Star case ― an American private equity fund whose earlier purchase of the Korean Exchange Bank backfired.
The Global Times, an influential daily that mainly carries China-related international news, has been conducting an online survey on the matter. As of Friday morning, 63 percent of Chinese respondents chose the Korean workers' union's interference with management as the primary reason for the Ssangyong crisis; 31 percent attributed it to the global financial crisis and only 6.5 percent said it was due mismanagement by SAIC.
Susan Shirk, a well-known American expert on China affairs, once cited the Global Times as the newspaper that most well represents typical Chinese sentiment.
The paper's online article on Ssangyong has drawn 653 comments, most of them negative towards not jut the Ssangyong union but Korea in general.
One comment read: "We need to alert ourselves. Don't let Chinese capital go out to invest in such a place that is narrow-minded and prone to create problems. Don't become a person who likes Korean fashion and watches Korean dramas."
Another news outlet, Chinanews.com, said the Ssangyong case is SAIC paying its dues to expand its overseas market and cited three reasons for the current downfall, namely, the SAIC's alleged failure to correctly deal with the Korean labor union, the global auto market slump and no means of dealing with Korean nationalism.
SAIC is the second largest Chinese automaker after First Automobile Works. It is also the first Chinese manufacturer to partner with a foreign investor, forming Shanghai Volkswagen Automotive with Germany's Volkswagen Group in 1989. SAIC purchased a controlling 51 percent stake in Ssangyong for $500 million in 2004, making it China's largest investment in South Korea.
Meanwhile, an official with the South Korean Embassy in Beijing said that his office has been monitoring the Chinese Internet closely against the backdrop of the Ssangyong case. Last year, it was Chinese Internet forums and web blogs that primarily contributed to the anti-Korean sentiment.
Yang Pyung-sup, director of the Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET)'s Beijing Branch, told The Korea Times the conflict has arisen because Korea and China have different interests.
``When Korea accepted the inflow of foreign capital to revive its ailing auto industry, it should have also considered a possible outflow of technology,'' he said, adding that it was also natural for SAIC to be interested in Ssangyong's technology when it decided to invest in the Korean auto company.
Industry sources say the Chinese government takes the Ssangyong matter very seriously as it considers the case critical to the survival of SAIC, which is 100 percent owned by the Shanghai government.
"After all, what was a business issue has now transformed into a political issue," Yang said.
Unfortunately, Yang said, there is no easy solution. Some worry that it may discourage future Chinese investment in Korea while others worry about a fresh round of anti-Korean sentiment in China.
Still other observers note that such conflict between two close neighbor countries with close economic ties is very common and should be dealt with in a calm manner. In fact, since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1992, Korea and China have become dramatically closer, especially in economics and trade. But the two have had very little time to discuss how to deal with trade conflicts that might arise, they say.
"Such issues are bound to surface more as the relationship between the two nations become closer. They need to learn to get used to these types of problems and develop a common strategy to tackle them," Yang said.
[email protected] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Temporary
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sucks..
Shoe on the other foot. Now Korea can feel the same shit they've been causing foreign companies ALA LoneStar. One homogenious society against another. They deserve each other imho. I think this is good Korea needs a good lesson in humility. Needs a swift kick in the nards as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
moosehead
Joined: 05 May 2007
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
when I was in Beijing recently I couldn't believe how many Ks are there - not only that - but observing the C in general, it was amazing how similar the two societies really are. I had toured C before a couple of years ago but hadn't been here all that long - now after some time, it's easier to see as I have a greater knowledge of K.
it's only a matter of time before K comes home to the Motherland - kicking and screaming of the masses no doubt will result, but there's money that will make the decisions by corp moguls who could care less about democracy and such trivial matters as workers' rights. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GoldMember
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Might have something to do with it being a small Korean/Chinese version of an American car company. Making big ugly gas guzzling vehicles few people want. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
weatherman
Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: Korea
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am sure Koreans could care less. They will muddle about a bit, then be aimless again with some new venture with China. The problem is that Korea needs China a lot more than China needs Korea. The real big brother isn't in the mood for whiny actions by its little brother. Oh, the justice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
