View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ManintheMiddle
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:51 pm Post subject: IS IT GOING TO BE BUSINESS AS USUAL UNDER OBAMA? |
|
|
I'm beginning to wonder.
He and his campaign managers vowed a squeaky-clean administration (sort of reminds me of Carter in 1977) based on principled governance.
-But we've got a Treasury Secretary who ran from the IRS before running it.
-Not that I care, but we've got a UnderSecretary of Defense who lobbied for Raytheon (evidenty Halliburton is considered more egregious).
-We've got a President who in his inaugural address chastized Communist and authoritarian states like China and North Korea (the only difference being he didn't mention them by name but Chinese central television blacked out that portion of his speech, so they got the message just the same).
-He appoints Rahm Emmanuel, a political insider in one of the country's most corrupt cities, Chicago, as his Chief of Staff
-He talked of the need to bolster the public schools but then sent his daughters to an elite private school in the capital (again, not that I care, only Bush's daughters attended public high schools in Austin, and one went to a public university afterward)
-The crowing Democratic leadership in the House couldn't even so much as provided a seat at the table for the recent budget negotiations over the bailout bill, a deliberate oversight that at least Obama tried to smooth over a few days later when visiting minority leaders in Congress.
And now we see lobbyists in major positions of power:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090128/pl_politico/18128
Yes, one has to wonder if the rhetoric that went into the pristine stratosphere wasn't just so much more liberal sanctimony. Of course, the mainstream media will give this a pass once again.
And the White female voters are still almost orgasmic over Obama, with his sistas rallying to his every word. So no help from that corner.
So where is the dissent? Oh, I know this is the honeymoon period and he's entitled to more smooching from his would-be critics. But what galls me is how anything of the same sort done by Bush immediately smacked of deceit and corruption for the bashers.
P.S. I voted for Obama, although with serious reservations and only after Powell's endorsement, so I can't be branded a partisan here.
Which raises a question:
Has Obama, who presumptuously likens himself to Lincoln as no president before has ever done, aimed his sights to high? Has he set unrealistic expectations for himself and his administration that might come back to haunt him? What say you? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Welll he's a lot more active than his predecessor. He's got the stimulus plan passed, he's already visited capital hill, and he's being pro-active towards Guantanamo.
I'd say he's a change from the past administration.
Quote: |
-We've got a President who in his inaugural address chastized Communist and authoritarian states like China and North Korea (the only difference being he didn't mention them by name but Chinese central television blacked out that portion of his speech, so they got the message just the same). |
I don't get how this is relevant to the rest of your remarks.
Quote: |
-He appoints Rahm Emmanuel, a political insider in one of the country's most corrupt cities, Chicago, as his Chief of Staff |
Actually he was a congressman from IL. I'd say he's more a Washington insider.
Quote: |
-He talked of the need to bolster the public schools but then sent his daughters to an elite private school in the capital (again, not that I care, only Bush's daughters attended public high schools in Austin, and one went to a public university afterward) |
Well I somehow doubt that they would have gone to public schools in DC.
And the Bush daughters went to private school before going to Austin High.
Quote: |
-The crowing Democratic leadership in the House couldn't even so much as provided a seat at the table for the recent budget negotiations over the bailout bill, a deliberate oversight that at least Obama tried to smooth over a few days later when visiting minority leaders in Congress. |
yes. Did Bush ever visit the Dems on capital hill? Or clinton visit the republicans? Maybe when they were a majority, but I sincerely doubt he did it before 1994. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
-He talked of the need to bolster the public schools but then sent his daughters to an elite private school in the capital (again, not that I care, only Bush's daughters attended public high schools in Austin, and one went to a public university afterward) |
So he talks about the need to improve public schools. Hmm...how did public schools get so bad?
Quote: |
So where is the dissent? Oh, I know this is the honeymoon period and he's entitled to more smooching from his would-be critics. But what galls me is how anything of the same sort done by Bush immediately smacked of deceit and corruption for the bashers. |
What you are seeing from Obama is bipartisanship. There is no dissent because the people that voted for him expected some of that (or at least they should have).
EDIT (note): I don't know the history of the people he appointed but....I'm guessing they may not be "clean"?
Quote: |
Has Obama, who presumptuously likens himself to Lincoln as no president before has ever done, aimed his sights to high? Has he set unrealistic expectations for himself and his administration that might come back to haunt him? What say you? |
Good and fair question.
The media has made Obama into a super human and I doubt that he'll be able to keep that up for very long. There will be/has to be some disenfranchisement. Given the problems he is facing, he's gonna get rode HARD.
That said, I appreciate that he has set high expectations. His work ethic and willingness to get things done (look what he had managed to organize BEFORE he was even inaugurated) is evidenced by his actions. So far, it's been reassuring but I agree that there is no way, my sense of comfort will remain for a long time.
That said, see what Fox News has to say. Daily show compiles Fox quotes:
http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart/#clip131158
That's a bit reactionary. But do yourself a favour and get to at LEAST the 2 minute mark where jon talks about an O'Reilly quote. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Business as usual? I don't know. The House just passed their version of the stimulus package 244-188 and after all the cocktail parties, private meetings, and reaching across the aisles to include Republican ideas, not one single Republican voted for the bill. So partisanship is still alive and well.
It looks right now as if the Republican House members have figured out a failsafe method: bargain hard and some of what you want in a bill and then vote against it. That way, you get to have your cake and it too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ManintheMiddle
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe it has something to do with the many extras in the spending bill that have nothing to do with stimulating the economy. Ya think maybe? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah. My favorite one was tens of millions of dollars for STD educational programs. Some of them, ManintheMiddle, are exploiting the crisis to further their non-crisis politics re: social spending -- just as they exploited the crisis to get all the pork they could the first time around.
Congress generally sucks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
See my previous thread on "Not a dime's worth of difference." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Geithner is a terrible pick. I only hope he is a patsy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ManintheMiddle
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, Chris 72, now if we could only get them to work on Louisiana's parishes.
Bruddah, Honolulu could use some cleaning up too now that my alter ego is gone from Iolani Palace.
Gopher:
Don't you just love it? The pork barrel was rolled out on the House floor yet again. I just hope the Senate can trim the fat before it's enacted into law. But Pelosi is passing off to Feinstein and they'll probably get their way. Never known a Californian liberal who didn't like government money. No wonder the state's broke. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|