Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How about petitioning MOE to take charge of CRC

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
polonius



Joined: 05 Jun 2004

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:26 am    Post subject: How about petitioning MOE to take charge of CRC Reply with quote

So, I was thinking. With all this talk of ATEK and the discrimination towards teachers, wouldn't it be better if MOE took charge of the CRC.

Here is how my suggestion would work.

In order for an E2 visa issuance number to be issued, immigration requires 8 things. Contract, pictures, photocopy of passport picture page, self stated health check, resume, Degree, transcripts and criminal check.

As it is, immigration does not keep the degree that is submitted as it is property of the teacher. I would suggest that they not keep the CRC as well.

The degree must then be shown to the MOE. Why not include the CRC in that package, as that was what they were doing long before this with the public school sector.

If the teacher is an F series visa holder, than they too should submit the CRC and degree to MOE, as they did in the public school sector.

I agree that F series visa holders should not submit the criminal check in order to receive their visa, unless it is an F5, (not really my belief, but it seems to be immigrations protocol now) which is almost like perminent status. However, I do believe that everyone should submit a CRC if they are working with children.

I have more faith in MOE keeping a computer record that teacher A has submitted a criminal check, and no longer needs to submit another one.

There are so many variants to this however, such as the shady hagwons not submitting paper work to the MOE.

I am sure there are holes in this theory. Feel free to poke away at them, and come up with some changes to make it better. Maybe then after some sort of consensus of what would be the best course of action could be brought to the MOJ and MOE. I don't think that they are unreasonable, and if presented with something that is more effecient, perhaps they might agree to it.

And to Chicken Lover, I am not trying to start up a class action group, nor trying to get membership. I am trying to suggest a better way around what ATEK had attempted to do. I await your response, and hope that you can suggest some good ideas.

I know this is all wishful thinking, and even though I am leaving in August, I would like to try to make things a little more efficient. That is what I do in my current position at my hagwon.

Cut, scrape, argue, disagree. If I am wrong, say so, I would consider it as brainstorming a proposal rather than sinking a ship
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gteacher



Joined: 24 May 2007
Location: Ghost in the machine

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:20 pm    Post subject: Re: How about petitioning MOE to take charge of CRC Reply with quote

polonius wrote:
So, I was thinking. With all this talk of ATEK and the discrimination towards teachers, wouldn't it be better if MOE took charge of the CRC.

Here is how my suggestion would work.

In order for an E2 visa issuance number to be issued, immigration requires 8 things. Contract, pictures, photocopy of passport picture page, self stated health check, resume, Degree, transcripts and criminal check.

As it is, immigration does not keep the degree that is submitted as it is property of the teacher. I would suggest that they not keep the CRC as well.

The degree must then be shown to the MOE. Why not include the CRC in that package, as that was what they were doing long before this with the public school sector.

If the teacher is an F series visa holder, than they too should submit the CRC and degree to MOE, as they did in the public school sector.

I agree that F series visa holders should not submit the criminal check in order to receive their visa, unless it is an F5, (not really my belief, but it seems to be immigrations protocol now) which is almost like perminent status. However, I do believe that everyone should submit a CRC if they are working with children.

I have more faith in MOE keeping a computer record that teacher A has submitted a criminal check, and no longer needs to submit another one.

There are so many variants to this however, such as the shady hagwons not submitting paper work to the MOE.

I am sure there are holes in this theory. Feel free to poke away at them, and come up with some changes to make it better. Maybe then after some sort of consensus of what would be the best course of action could be brought to the MOJ and MOE. I don't think that they are unreasonable, and if presented with something that is more effecient, perhaps they might agree to it.

And to Chicken Lover, I am not trying to start up a class action group, nor trying to get membership. I am trying to suggest a better way around what ATEK had attempted to do. I await your response, and hope that you can suggest some good ideas.

I know this is all wishful thinking, and even though I am leaving in August, I would like to try to make things a little more efficient. That is what I do in my current position at my hagwon.

Cut, scrape, argue, disagree. If I am wrong, say so, I would consider it as brainstorming a proposal rather than sinking a ship


The biggest hole is the one that the hagwons/MoE care about the most. You get a teacher, fly them over on your dime and when they get here they have a CRC full of crimes. You have to fly them back, because they are on your visa.

The CRC is going to stay part of the visa process, there is no changing that, it is a wise business move.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A simpler more efficient system would be this:

a)The first time we apply for a work visa, we submit all the forms required by Immi and they check the university etc and issue each of us an ID number.

b) When we apply for a job at any time in the future, we include our ID number. The school checks with Immi to see that we are indeed who we say we are.

c) Finished.

One or possibly two office workers stashed somewhere in an office with a computer can send out our transcripts by e-mail to any school/job interested in hiring us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They already have this information.... as in the number on our ARC, if I'm not mistaken. All they have to do is look on their computers and they have records of our past work history/visas in Korea.

It should be a relatively easy thing for them to be able to see whether or not all relevant documents were submitted in previous years, at least that's what you'd think.

For some reason, they are refusing to do this. I can only assume it's because they want to make things as difficult, complicated and time consuming for us as possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
They already have this information.... as in the number on our ARC, if I'm not mistaken. All they have to do is look on their computers and they have records of our past work history/visas in Korea.

It should be a relatively easy thing for them to be able to see whether or not all relevant documents were submitted in previous years, at least that's what you'd think.

For some reason, they are refusing to do this. I can only assume it's because they want to make things as difficult, complicated and time consuming for us as possible.



I doubt that. It's more likely that they are too lazy to boot up their computer and check. Cuts into their coffee breaks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lazyness, or policy I am not sure, but I know I have been in there and they have had my complete records in front of them on the computor, and they still insist on having me submit all documents yet again.

Whatever the reason, it sucks for us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ramen



Joined: 15 Apr 2008

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
Lazyness, or policy I am not sure, but I know I have been in there and they have had my complete records in front of them on the computor, and they still insist on having me submit all documents yet again.

Whatever the reason, it sucks for us.


It's all about job security. Korean gov't would have to let go of half of immi force if they ever automated their system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cruisemonkey



Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Location: Hopefully, the same place as my luggage.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
They already have this information.... as in the number on our ARC, if I'm not mistaken. All they have to do is look on their computers and they have records of our past work history/visas in Korea.

It should be a relatively easy thing for them to be able to see whether or not all relevant documents were submitted in previous years, at least that's what you'd think.


Yes... and no. Many people have had different ARC numbers on different contracts. It seems there has been no national, 'uniformity' in how ARCs were issued - different Immi offices have done things differently from others. Personally, I have always had the same ARC number for four different contracts with two different employers (and I took a month off between jobs). However, this is not the case for everyone.

As for Immi keeping a record of one's degree and CRC, it makes sense for the degree but not the CRC. Once one has a degree it can never be rescinded. However, a criminal record (or lack thereof) can change - hence the 'expiry' after six months. That being said, it would make sense for Immi to allow a new visa without another CRC if the new visa is applied for within six months of the 'original'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International