| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tfunk

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: A wiki for a basic criterion of teaching knowledge? |
|
|
Wouldn't it be useful to new teachers if there was a wiki where they could read teaching tips and a syllabus guideline from experienced teachers within the Korean teaching system?
I think it would raise the status of our profession if we took the ball into our own hands and worked among ourselves to create a basic standard of teaching knowledge that is applicable to the Korean teaching situation. This wiki would be especially useful if it focused on the distinguishing advantages and disadvantages a native speaker has in teaching in the Korean classroom (e.g. teaching phonetics).
I've met teachers that can't spell 'Wensday' and have worse spelling skills than the students they are teaching. I'm talking about very basic standards here and nothing as involved as the CELTA etc.
E.g.
A basic understanding of children.
Case studies of both useful and counterproductive teaching behavior.
Spelling skills.
An intermediate understanding of grammar.
If people were interested and a wiki was created then this body of knowledge could potentially be used as the basis to create tests and then possibly basic accreditation for teachers in Korea. This accreditation could be used to determine a pay scale and help distinguish different qualities of teachers to Korean parents and media. It would also help raise the level of self-esteem among teachers here if they knew there was a concrete and definable teaching syllabus for native speakers by which to work to. The improved status of foreign teachers in Korea could also help organization such as ATEK.
So, what do you think? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone comes to the table with their own agenda, so such a "wiki utopia" won't exist. However, here is my attempt at one (in progress) http://englishlessons.wikispaces.com
(If you do like the wiki, instead of using it the way it was intended for group projects, make your own and you can embed pages from other wikis. This will give it more of an individual aspect. I suggest you then use it for older students if you have them.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
danby_ll
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:26 pm Post subject: Re: A wiki for a basic criterion of teaching knowledge? |
|
|
| tfunk wrote: |
I've met teachers that can't spell 'Wensday' and have worse spelling skills than the students they are teaching. |
Do you mean "Wednesday"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D.D.
Joined: 29 May 2008
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think we are here to teach conversation skills. With computers spelling and other basic skills are becoming less important.
Some very bright people are bad at spelling. Anal people are good at spelling and believe that it is very important. I think they are called concrete sequential people. Others look at the bigger picture rather than focus on details.
Creative thinking and use of the language is more important than the blocks that make the language. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tfunk

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lifeinkorea wrote: |
Everyone comes to the table with their own agenda, so such a "wiki utopia" won't exist. However, here is my attempt at one (in progress) http://englishlessons.wikispaces.com
|
This looks very interesting and is exactly what I had in mind for a web project I was working on. I'll check it out later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tfunk

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| D.D. wrote: |
I think we are here to teach conversation skills. With computers spelling and other basic skills are becoming less important.
Some very bright people are bad at spelling. Anal people are good at spelling and believe that it is very important. I think they are called concrete sequential people. Others look at the bigger picture rather than focus on details.
Creative thinking and use of the language is more important than the blocks that make the language. |
Spelling is an important skill for English learners to acquire. Sure, a mathematician, scientist etc. probably doesn't need to spell accurately but it reflects badly on an English teacher when they can't spell basic words correctly. Even if we are here to teach conversation skills (I've never had a hagwon director sit me down and tell me this) that doesn't mean that we can teach the students incorrect skills.
I walked past a teachers classroom once and the sentance 'today is wensday' was written on the whiteboard. Even though it mightn't have been the focus of the lesson, the students are indirectly learning how to spell from their teacher.
| D.D. wrote: |
Creative thinking and use of the language is more important than the blocks that make the language. |
The two aren't mutually exclusive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|