Korean Job Discussion Forums

[ManintheMiddle]

So the feeding frenzy of the liberal media has begun. It continued acts of "binding the nation's wounds" in the "spirit of bipartisanship" the Democratic Party leaders are doing anything but that. John Conyers, whose wife faces indictment on fraud charges, is himself leading the charge to bring the Bush Administration to court. Then we've got Eric Holder declaring rather smugly that the policy of rendition is under review. And of course the Messiah himself has signaled the end to the era of torture.

But here's a dirty little secret: the rendition policy was formulated during the CLINTON administration. Bush merely expanded it to meet the new demands, i.e. a growing number of captured Al-Qaida operatives.

Of course only FoxNews has reported this--oh, and Robert Gates has acknowledged as much and last time I checked he was still the Secretary of Defense. Leon Panetta also begrudgingly admitted as much under duress during his confirmation hearings.

And so it goes--tell a big lie often enough and they'll believe it.

[catman]

I don't care if the blame is spread around. Of course I'm not a Democrat either.

[Jeff's Cigarettes]

I would say go for it, �Bring it on�, but the commission would have access to national security secrets, and we all Know how well Leaky Leahy and his cohorts treat those.

In the effort to OBEY Teh Majic One and be �bi-partisan� I�m willing to meet them half way. Once any liberal communist can cite me one, just one, actual statute that Bush may have violated, showing the specific elements of the offense, same as required before a PC affidavit can be written, a warrant served, or an arrest made, then I will gladly entertain the thought of a �Twoof Duma�. Until, then they can pound sand.

Again, just for our reading comprehension impaired libtards;

1. Cite the specific U.S. statute or ratified treaty that Bush allegedly violated.
2. Demonstrate the specific actions of Bush which meet the element of the offense.

And don�t give me the tired old bullshit �Illegal War� or �torture�. The crimes you cite must state specific actions and meet the legal definition of the offense.

[bacasper]

Have you read Vincent Bugliosi's The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder?

[Hater Depot]

I'm not against rendition in all cases, just when it is used to send people to countries where they'll be tortured because we don't want to get our hands dirty. Absent torture, there is no problem. I doubt you will find many people to disagree with that position.

[TheUrbanMyth]

[bacasper]

[TheUrbanMyth]