|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
travelingfool
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Location: Parents' basement
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:04 am Post subject: Army extends immigrant recruiting |
|
|
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-immigrant-recruits4-2009may04,0,5078748,full.story
Pilot program seeks to boost the ranks of language and healthcare specialists by offering citizenship.
By Alexandra Zavis and Andrew Becker
May 4, 2009
The lanky 19-year-old from South Korea has lived in the Southland since he was 9 years old. He is as comfortable speaking English as his native Korean. And he desperately wants to join the Army.
Late last week, the teenager walked into a recruiting office in an Eagle Rock mall wearing a pendant shaped like a dog tag around his neck. Until recently, local recruiters would have had to turn him away. His student visa would not have qualified him to enlist. Only citizens or permanent residents who carry green cards were eligible to serve.
But starting today, 10 Los Angeles-area Army recruiting offices will begin taking applications from some foreigners who are here on temporary visas or who have been granted asylum.
In all, the pilot program, which was launched in New York in February, seeks to enlist 1,000 military recruits with special language and medical skills, most of whom will join the Army. Response to the program has exceeded expectations, drawing applications from more than 7,000 people around the country, many of them highly educated, defense officials said.
*I personally think if a person is willing to join the Army and risk their lives I think they should be given citizenship. Not that anyone would ever want to join the Korean army, but do you think they would be willing to do the same with a foreigner? A foreigner who was willing to serve and possibly give their lives? Nope. I think it would be interesting to show this article to your older students and see what they have to say. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blurgalurgalurga
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, it worked for the Romans... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wesharris
Joined: 10 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, but the Romans didn't have instantaneous forms of communication, and the ability to coordinate strategically on a more massive scale.
Now did they?
_+_+
Wes |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|