View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ytuque

Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Location: I drink therefore I am!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skeeterses
Joined: 25 Oct 2007
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
At the heart of the controversy is the issue of how the language should be taught to Koreans. At least 2,500 hours of language classes are needed to make basic communication in English possible, according to experts. Korean students take just 730 hours, including lessons in elementary, junior and senior high schools. And the English classes themselves do not promote the improvement of conversational skills. Expanding the number of English classes is crucial in order to improve the level of English language proficiency among Koreans. |
The Koreans spend way more time learning English than 730 hours. Think of all those hours they spend going to hagwons. The amount of English studying the Korean kids actually do in their childhood and teen years is far more than 2,500 hours. The amount of time they spend in the classrooms is excessive.
And as far as watching English language TV programs are concerned, the majority of Korean kids have Internet Access but choose not to watch American TV on youtube. I think the real issue here is that they simply don't want to learn English. Think about it. If you spend 6 hours in a public school and then another couple hours being force fed someone else's foreign language, would you want to watch TV in that foreign language?
The Korean Government needs to leave the kids alone for God's sake and let them decide for themselves if they want to learn English or not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ytuque

Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Location: I drink therefore I am!
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skeeterses wrote: |
The Koreans spend way more time learning English than 730 hours. Think of all those hours they spend going to hagwons. The amount of English studying the Korean kids actually do in their childhood and teen years is far more than 2,500 hours. The amount of time they spend in the classrooms is excessive.
|
Of all those hours in a classroom studying English, what percentage of time is instruction actually in English? From my kid's experience, it is about 85% Korean 15% English. The result is studying English in a Korean school is a great way to learn Korean. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Is there enough English education? |
Not enough for the people that need it, too much for the people that don't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skeeterses
Joined: 25 Oct 2007
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree that a lot of the teaching methods and textbooks used are not exactly efficient ways to learn English. However, before there can be any talk about English fluency on a large scale, there must be some limits set in place.
For starters, there must be a strict limit on the amount of time the kids are spending in the classroom. 1 or 2 classes after school is reasonable. Staying at a hagwon past dinner time is not. With many hagwons operating up to midnight, it should be obvious that the last thing Korean children need is more English classes. The kids need 8 hours of sleep as well as some time to play outside and be kids.
Second of all, Koreans need to seriously rethink about the need for every Korean schoolchild to learn English. Sure, some occupations like the Education profession and Chaebols need some English speakers. But other occupations like Taxi Driving and Construction don't. What business does the Government have telling all the children that they have to learn English?
I don't expect too many English teachers to question the need for so many Korean schoolchildren to attend ESL hagwons. And the reason is that ESL is big business in Korea. As Jon Huer said, this is one business where fortunes are made and lost. Native English teachers, Korean English teachers, Hagwon owners, textbook publishers, they're making money off the ESL horse. Why should they question the whole rationale behind the ESL Industry? After all, all the students are going to grow up, get good TOEIC scores, and then land a job at a Chaebol and live happily ever after. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Corea wrote: |
Quote: |
Is there enough English education? |
Not enough for the people that need it, too much for the people that don't. |
This is a very much to the truth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
skeeterses wrote: |
Second of all, Koreans need to seriously rethink about the need for every Korean schoolchild to learn English. Sure, some occupations like the Education profession and Chaebols need some English speakers. But other occupations like Taxi Driving and Construction don't. What business does the Government have telling all the children that they have to learn English?
|
and what business is it of yours to say taxi drivers don't need E ??
my goodness - if anyone needs E it's a taxi driver!!
and yes, store clerks need it also - and police and er people - jees - stop trying to separate people into SEC and decide who does and does not need a foreign language -
as for someone saying it's +2000 hrs of E edu to learn basic communication - my god where did they get that from?? maybe it's because E edu in K is such a miserable failure as so many Ks have been studying E (allegedly) in school for 10 or more years and STILL can't utter a word of it.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skeeterses
Joined: 25 Oct 2007
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
moosehead wrote: |
skeeterses wrote: |
and yes, store clerks need it also - and police and er people - jees - stop trying to separate people into SEC and decide who does and does not need a foreign language -
as for someone saying it's +2000 hrs of E edu to learn basic communication - my god where did they get that from?? maybe it's because E edu in K is such a miserable failure as so many Ks have been studying E (allegedly) in school for 10 or more years and STILL can't utter a word of it.  |
|
If many Koreans questioned the need for every Korean school-child to get fluent in English, it wouldn't exactly be good for the ESL Industry in Korea, would it? Sure things would be a little helpful for the non-Korean speaking foreigners if the taxi drivers and store clerks to do basic stuff in English like give directions and count change. But to expect every Korean to be able to read the New York Times or watch CNN is a little ridiculous. You and I both agree that the state of ESL education in the public schools is a failure. But if Korea were to actually fix their English education in the public schools, there wouldn't be a need for so many English teachers, would there? Basically, you and many other English teachers could be out of a job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skeeterses wrote: |
But if Korea were to actually fix their English education in the public schools, there wouldn't be a need for so many English teachers, would there? Basically, you and many other English teachers could be out of a job. |
And so I agree.
If public education does not suffice for the general public, private industry will take over.
Public and private are not competing, but private takes over what public is leaving on the floor.
That is why many of you have a good job in Korea (and in some ways it could be described of as wasted resources). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jane

Joined: 01 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To answer your question, OP, there is enough education.
The truth is: Koreans just aren't interested in anything outside of Korea. They don't care about non-Korean stuff, and this translates into their English learning.
I've said this before, there is nothing wrong with English teaching in Korea (except for the horrible public school curriculum, riddled with errors, being taught by non-English speakers), there is something wrong with the learners.
Where there is an obligation (to teach English), there is a responsibility (to learn it). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jane wrote: |
To answer your question, OP, there is enough education.
The truth is: Koreans just aren't interested in anything outside of Korea. They don't care about non-Korean stuff, and this translates into their English learning. |
Wow, who the heck to you hang out with?
MOST of the Koreans I know are very interested in the 'outside world'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robot_Teacher
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Location: Robotting Around the World
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since you can't really use English functionally outside of school for communication, students often lack understanding why they're put to the task of studying English. If there were a robust tourism industry involving Westerners, then many more Koreans would speak English like common for other non-English countries seeing significant tourism. Learning something hard has to carry percieved benefits for it to really manifest within a population on a local and national level. To put the English learning in Korea into analogy. It's like trying to learn uni level biology and chemistry, which are very hard science courses, just so you can graduate college. Since most people know very little about high science and you don't go talking all that jargon and know you aren't going to work with that knowledge, it makes being interested in it and learning it very difficult at best. Naturally, some people pick it up easily even if they don't use a specific knowledge in their line of work as some Koreans speak English very well, but rarily use it as Korean is the only thing spoken in every day life. Korea needs English speakers in jobs that work directly with the public to encourage communication in English and to really open up to the world by accommodating foreigners and students practicing their English in real life situations such as in a shop. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robot_Teacher
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Location: Robotting Around the World
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since you can't really use English functionally outside of school for communication, students often lack understanding why they're put to the task of studying English. If there were a robust tourism industry involving Westerners, then many more Koreans would speak English like common for other non-English countries seeing significant tourism. Learning something hard has to carry percieved benefits for it to really manifest within a population on a local and national level. To put the English learning in Korea into analogy. It's like trying to learn uni level biology and chemistry, which are very hard science courses, just so you can graduate college. Since most people know very little about high science and you don't go talking all that jargon and know you aren't going to work with that knowledge, it makes being interested in it and learning it very difficult at best. Naturally, some people pick it up easily even if they don't use a specific knowledge in their line of work as some Koreans speak English very well, but rarily use it as Korean is the only thing spoken in every day life. Korea needs English speakers in jobs that work directly with the public to encourage communication in English and to really open up to the world by accommodating foreigners and students practicing their English in real life situations such as in a shop. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zantetsuken
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Captain Corea wrote: |
Jane wrote: |
To answer your question, OP, there is enough education.
The truth is: Koreans just aren't interested in anything outside of Korea. They don't care about non-Korean stuff, and this translates into their English learning. |
Wow, who the heck to you hang out with?
MOST of the Koreans I know are very interested in the 'outside world'. |
Yeah bro...but not everyone lives in Seoul like you...and works with the captains of industry and people with money. Once you step outside Gangnam...the average Korean cares about 우리나라 and 신토불이 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jane

Joined: 01 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Zantetsuken wrote: |
Captain Corea wrote: |
Jane wrote: |
To answer your question, OP, there is enough education.
The truth is: Koreans just aren't interested in anything outside of Korea. They don't care about non-Korean stuff, and this translates into their English learning. |
Wow, who the heck to you hang out with?
MOST of the Koreans I know are very interested in the 'outside world'. |
Yeah bro...but not everyone lives in Seoul like you...and works with the captains of industry and people with money. Once you step outside Gangnam...the average Korean cares about 우리나라 and 신토불이 |
Captain Corea, all due respect cuz I like your posts, but if you take a macro look at the Korean economy and industry, Korea doesn't play well with others. Anytime cooperation is required from the 'outside world', Korea falls flat. Why? Because Koreans genuinely don't give a rat about what doesn't involve kimchi and the Wonder Girls. This attitude very much turns people off and 'outside' people are reluctant to play with Korea.
I'm not saying Koreans aren't good and nice people; I'm saying they simply have no interest in anything beyond Dokdo. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|